• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
debunker, why are you posting an article from 2007? Please, there is a GENERAL thread for all of this, and you've been pointed to this thread numerous times. You're just now flooding the forum with threads, that really do not need it's own topic.
 
Baby Nemesis said:
But just because the people sent into Iraq volunteered to go into the army, that doesn't mean it was ethical to be reckless with their lives and send them into any war of the government's choosing. Even though they were military people, it still shows a disregard for the value of human life, especially when the government must have known a lot of Iraqi civilians would get killed.
Click to expand...

It was not ethical, and I hate the Bush admin for it. Most of us here separate the 9/11 attacks and Iraq, when discussing it because while linked in terms of the govt on watch at the time, and linked in terms of using one to promote another, they are not linked in terms of CTs surrounding "who dunit"

TAM:)
 
In general, if a topic you have in mind is small in nature, let us say, a comment on someone, or the latest video from someone, or a simple question you may have, then it probably DOES NOT deserve its own thread.

If a topic is brand new, never discussed here before, and could muster a decent discussion of a few pages, then it like DOES deserve one.

Likewise, if a topic is large, and you were unable to find your answers, or a discussion on the topic by typing in the topic + JREF in google, then perhaps it would warrant its own thread.

hope this helps.

TAM:)
 
 
Although the policies of the Bush Administration regarding Iraq were wrong, he would have never been able to invade Iraq if Saddam would have simply complied with the UN resolutions. I just don't think he could of counted on this in any formula to invade. 911 alone would not have the ample support to proceed with his war policy.
 
T.A.M. said:
It was not ethical, and I hate the Bush admin for it. Most of us here separate the 9/11 attacks and Iraq, when discussing it because while linked in terms of the govt on watch at the time, and linked in terms of using one to promote another, they are not linked in terms of CTs surrounding "who dunit"

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Don't most Truthers think the reason the American government did 9/11 was to give them an excuse to invade Iraq though?

But I'm just wondering why anyone would be angry that the American government are accused of doing 9/11, given that they're not averse to getting people killed, so it's not as if it's as slanderous as if a group of human rights and peace campaigners was accused of doing it, for instance. I mean, for example, imagine if Truthers accused Amnesty International of doing it. :D Or Human Rights Watch. Or Oxfam. Or the Save the Children charity. I mean, That would be a gross slander worth getting seriously annoyed about. :D But why get annoyed because an organisation that's proved it's capable of policies that cause a lot of killing gets accused of it?
 
debunker9145, as I'm sure you know, this photo was discussed in another thread yesterday. I note that 10 of your 22 posts have been new threads, seemingly repeating old information at random. That includes a thread about Richard Gage's personal life (moved to AAH) and one in which you say you may be a transsexual, but aren't sure. You don't seem interested in discussing the subjects you raise. This strikes me as trolling behavior. I hope to be proven wrong.
 
Last edited:
This new debunker9145 sniffs of troll to me as well. His threads have all had an incediary and often irrelevant or inappropriate OP, and he hasn't stuck around to have any sort of real interchange.

So, even though his plumage is a different shade than we're used to seeing around here -

:tr:
 
I wonder what a combination of "all your base" with yoda speak would end up as. Probably incomprehensible.
 
I made a 9/11 crackpot index in order to evaluate new truthers before arguing with them here: CLICK HERE

You can evaluate other truthers who post regularly here ;)

(If you see some EngRish words, please send me the grammar nazi, as English is not my mother language).
 
240-185 said:
I made a 9/11 crackpot index in order to evaluate new truthers before arguing with them here: CLICK HERE

You can evaluate other truthers who post regularly here ;)

(If you see some EngRish words, please send me the grammar nazi, as English is not my mother language).
Click to expand...

Nicely done! :D

Just one thing though: After I hit submit, the results came back in french. I think I can figure it out though. :)
 
240-185 said:
I made a 9/11 crackpot index in order to evaluate new truthers before arguing with them here: CLICK HERE

You can evaluate other truthers who post regularly here ;)

(If you see some EngRish words, please send me the grammar nazi, as English is not my mother language).
Click to expand...


I have a very minor nitpick. "Media" is the plural, so you do not need to add the "s" in this option:

"You are blinded and brainwashed by mainstream medias!!111!"

Other than that, it was very fun! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom