• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The psychological make up of the "truth movement" is likely similar to the make up of the general population, with the following exceptions (IMO):

1. Paranoia exists within the group, I suspect, at higher levels than within the gen. pop.
2. Anger, especially with authority, I suspect, exists at higher levels than in the gen. pop.
3. Personality Disorders, I suspect, exist at higher levels than the gen. pop.

Of course, this is all speculative, and based mostly on my encounters with truthers (as I define them - active promoters of 9/11 CTs) on the internet.

TAM:)
 
Empty. No content identified from the Angry Young Boy.

Empty. No content identified from the Angry Old Boy.

You made the claim JJ, back it up. I took the antithesis, that the video did not show volunteers cleaning up the steel but rather professionals focusing on investigation. I proved my claim. Don't try to weasel your way out of this by asking more stupid questions.
JihadJane said:
The video, I am guessing, is more likley to be evidence of a totally under-resourced, too-little-too -late effort by valiant volunteers working on the fringes of a huge clean-up and disposal operation that was focussed on disposal and recycling not investigation
Where are the volunteers? Why does the video show Dr. Corley investigating the steel? Why does the narrator say investigators combed over the wreckage for months looking for clues as to why the towers fell?
 
Last edited:
I have seen in some websites that Loose Change was intended to be a fictional movie. But I don't see any backup for this claim. Is there a place where it is proved that it was one, indeed?

Sorry if I missed it :S
It started as a fictional screenplay, but then Avery came to believe that these things might be true and started investigoogling, which led him to write Loose Change, which is supposed to be a documentary.
 
One of their members beat up an 18 year old girl in a wheelchair simply because she was a fan of Laura Bush. That went unmatched until one of the leaders of "wearechange" colorado. Stabbed his own father to death in his sleep, after his father called Alex Jones, to get the twoof mongers to leave his son alone. In a move that should not be surprising to anyone he pleaded guilty by insanity. or something like that. Will we be seeing anymore killer twoofers?

Dat Canadian troofer? Jeff Hill? eh? ya now he had to go to court, eh? fer throwin rocks at a Masonic lodge in Canada? yep he was pretty angry dat day, eh?

Originally Posted by shure@lc
wanna hear how stupid I am,

When I first found out about freemansons and stuff I went and smahed the masonic temple with rocks ! cause I got angry and mad and fired up as alex would say

That was my first lesson in how not to do activism, at the time I thought I was doing something right and its a long story, I whish I could tell you about my personal stuff without you guys thinking the wrong way !

But hey I might have to go to jail for that in 2 weeks but atleast I will be able to bring up 9/11 in the middle of court In front of everyone, I have a PRETTY NUTTY
plan and would love some advice for court from people, does anyone want to help me fine tune my strategy or did I just make myself look like a nut by telling you guys only half the story !!!!!!
 
Last edited:
I've been digging through some truther blogs...holding my nose the entire time. I keep coming across this term - "WQ2RX." It's hard to make heads or tails of it, but it seems to be some sort of organization within the TM that a lot of people accuse each other of being in. It looks like an instance of the 9/11 TM eating itself. I don't really know how old this stuff is or how relevant it is to anything at all. Just wondering if anyone else who's monitored the TM more closely than I has seen this term. It seems to revolve around Nico Haupt a lot.
 
A little crack investigoogling seems to indicate WQ2RX originated from Webfairy and the no-planers (like Nico) to claim various responsible truthers (I notice John Albanese coming up in almost all discussions of it) are disinfo. Basically: yes, it appears to be the various splinter groups in the TM sniping at one another and eating themselves.
Col. Jenny Sparks talks WQ2RX on the truthaction forum
Webfairy claims the term on the 911movement forum (fair warning, this thread is pretty vile and I feel quite dirty offering it up)

Side note... my word, it's a wretched enterprise looking at truther forums. I guess they really can get more ridiculous.
 
Outside of the"pedophilia" mix up we have had, on what basis do you call me "Angry"?

TAM:)

You give away a free insult with every post, which you justify by saying your insultees are accusung the mass-murdering Bush administration of mass murder. I interpret this as indicating that you are driven by anger to insult . Your numerous, tedious and habitually irritable, “clever”, one liner anti-twoofer insults also suggest unusually high levels of permanently boiling rage.

Perhaps I am wrong and it’s just some kind of gentle obssessive/compulsive disorder that drives your daily need to insult. Or could it be an autism-related quirk?


That was kind of the point. Also, name-calling is a no-no...


The post you refer to satirizes on T.A.M.'s free-with-every-post, "Angry Young Boy" name-calling.

One of their members beat up an 18 year old girl in a wheelchair simply because she was a fan of Laura Bush. That went unmatched until one of the leaders of "wearechange" colorado. Stabbed his own father to death in his sleep, after his father called Alex Jones, to get the twoof mongers to leave his son alone. In a move that should not be surprising to anyone he pleaded guilty by insanity. or something like that. Will we be seeing anymore killer twoofers?

Yawn.

What do you know about the people whose private hells you seek to appropriate for your cause?


You made the claim JJ, back it up. I took the antithesis, that the video did not show volunteers cleaning up the steel but rather professionals focusing on investigation. I proved my claim. Don't try to weasel your way out of this by asking more stupid questions.

Where are the volunteers? Why does the video show Dr. Corley investigating the steel? Why does the narrator say investigators combed over the wreckage for months looking for clues as to why the towers fell?

Do you remember (or care) what my original claim was?

There is, apparently, so much twoofer swill around that people can spend their whole happy lives swimming in it, as illustrated by the many eager swimmers on this thread such as your good self. Why do you then need to make stuff up? Taking sentences out of context and then inventing and imposing your own meaning on them is a degenerate and abusive game.
 
JJ;

Do not mistake disgust, and irritation with anger. As for the rest, leave it to the professionals.

TAM:)
 
I think that it is hilarious that the twoof movement is all splintered up and accusing each other of being disinfo agents and such.
 
Dat Canadian troofer? Jeff Hill? eh? ya now he had to go to court, eh? fer throwin rocks at a Masonic lodge in Canada? yep he was pretty angry dat day, eh?



He may have broadened his horizons and ventured into video HERE Pomeroo gets a bit of a bashing in the beginning, the rest is just a montage of his moronic phone-call blaggings, I think, I could only stomach 10 minutes or so.

By the way, our Jeffs effort is called "Continuos (sic) Pieces" is that the Canadian spelling :-] Stundie up for grabs there methinks.

BV
 
British engineer Dr. Keith Seffen has helped shatter 9/11 conspiracy theories

"The World Trade Centre towers were designed to absorb an aircraft impact but an accidental one with much less fuel and speed," he said.

"It is widely acknowledged that the impacts on September 11th were extraordinary, which led to consequences well in excess of the design capacity for the buildings. The original design of both towers must be praised for standing as long as they did, saving more lives than might have been expected."

"Dr Seffen's research showed many studies focused on the phase just before collapse begins.

"They rightly show that the combination of fire and impact damage severely impaired those parts of the building close to where the aircraft hit to hold the weight of the building above. The top parts were bound to fall down but it was not clear why the undamaged building should have offered little resistance to these falling parts,""

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/sep/11/highereducation.uk1
 
JihadJane said:
You give away a free insult with every post, which you justify by saying your insultees are accusung the mass-murdering Bush administration of mass murder.

That's one thing I don't understand. Why do people get so angry that Truthers accuse the American government of mass murder, when all it means is that they're accusing them of causing 3000 more deaths than the thousands of American deaths their actions led to in Iraq? It's not as if they're totally averse to killing, or even to having their own people killed, is it. So why should the slander cause any outrage?
 
That's one thing I don't understand. Why do people get so angry that Truthers accuse the American government of mass murder, when all it means is that they're accusing them of causing 3000 more deaths than the thousands of American deaths their actions led to in Iraq? It's not as if they're totally averse to killing, or even to having their own people killed, is it. So why should the slander cause any outrage?
You miss the major difference in the fact the deaths in Iraq were military men and women who volunteered to serve. The deaths in the WTC were innocents.

This has nothing to do with the validity of the war. Just a cold, hard fact.
 
You miss the major difference in the fact the deaths in Iraq were military men and women who volunteered to serve. The deaths in the WTC were innocents.

This has nothing to do with the validity of the war. Just a cold, hard fact.

But just because the people sent into Iraq volunteered to go into the army, that doesn't mean it was ethical to be reckless with their lives and send them into any war of the government's choosing. Even though they were military people, it still shows a disregard for the value of human life, especially when the government must have known a lot of Iraqi civilians would get killed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom