Arus808
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
I fear you.
![]()
10.70 on the quarter is something to fear. ^_^ Love it though.
I fear you.
![]()
[ot] haha, nice...wanna see mines?
[qimg]http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m108/Arus808/stuff/DSC00792copy_edited.jpg[/qimg]
edit: Click above for good nose detail, at 1/4 resolution![]()
Vinatieri kick the winning.... Oh, right.
OK, I guess I have to admit to being an addicted link-clicker. Now I know waaaaaaaaaaay too much about e^n's cat's nose.
Pooh all over you.
I don't like honey. Having said that, trade ya Peppers for Alexander and a 1st round.
Nah, I wants me some Jason Taylor.
If you people jumped all over NIST's findings as you are jumping on this video evidence, you might find yourself becoming a truther. However there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of skepticism in this supposed "skeptical" forum. Being a skeptic would be more like being a truther IMO. Why does nobody here seem in the least bit skeptical of the official accounts (FEMA, 911commissh, NIST)? I have lots of questions about 911 and to put it simply I think its pathetic that you people don't!
Pretty sad you guys all congregate at JREF where 98% of the posters are all anti-truth. Must take alot of balls. I guess being with your fellow people you feel better about yourself inside.
Oh well I hope I got through to some of you. Some of your skulls seem to be 10 feet thick though. Can't waste my time ya know? The evidence is out there. Watch it. I could care less what conclusion you come to...it "should" be obvious...
Ehhh...BYE
Yes I read this. But I don't understand how the FAA can be plotting a projected position heading NE when the last known orientation was SW before the transponder was (supposedly) turned off. Trust me I'm looking into this flight explorer thing but I have severe doubts it would be plotting much anything like this. Of course this is assuming flight explorer is indeed dependent on a flights transponder as one of your "hardcore debunkers" here has said. But that would not make sense.
I think you people are really really reaching. Again we have the 1/100 chance thing. Think how much easier the explanation would be if you just admit flight 175 is still there. The plane that crashed wasn't flight 175 and there was no 1/100 coincidence. Its so easy understanding the world when you look at whats happening from truther eyes. You don't ponder why the economy is going to **** and why we are still in Iraq. You know.
Yup. Who wants a drink?
[qimg]http://beer-ligion.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/hot_beer_girl.jpg[/qimg]