• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Abolute proof UAL 175 never struck WTC tower 2

I've seen kittening a thread but this is the first time I've seen biking a thread.


Awesome picture Arus808.....and the bike's nice too.:D
 
this thread is offcially done now.


Selma.jpg
 
[ot] haha, nice...wanna see mines?
[qimg]http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m108/Arus808/stuff/DSC00792copy_edited.jpg[/qimg]

Sweet :)

I picked up an 08 R1 last year. I only use it for track days though
 
Hey guys check out my bike!

5542.jpg

(not my picture)

Also one of my cats (the dumber, fatter one!)

edit: Click above for good nose detail, at 1/4 resolution :)
 
OK, I guess I have to admit to being an addicted link-clicker. Now I know waaaaaaaaaaay too much about e^n's cat's nose.




Pooh all over you.


I don't like honey. Having said that, trade ya Peppers for Alexander and a 1st round.
 
Nah, I wants me some Jason Taylor.

Taylor gettin kinda old...

Plus he a lil bit light in tha booty...

ETA: Heyyyyyy!!!! This ain't the sports forum!!11!!! (Sorry I doubt he'll come back, but this is a bit off don't wanna get a mod in trouble. Plus I'm off tomorrow thus i'm a bit tipsy.)
 
Last edited:
If you people jumped all over NIST's findings as you are jumping on this video evidence, you might find yourself becoming a truther. However there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of skepticism in this supposed "skeptical" forum. Being a skeptic would be more like being a truther IMO. Why does nobody here seem in the least bit skeptical of the official accounts (FEMA, 911commissh, NIST)? I have lots of questions about 911 and to put it simply I think its pathetic that you people don't!

would you like some cheese with your whine?

TAM:)
 
Pretty sad you guys all congregate at JREF where 98% of the posters are all anti-truth. Must take alot of balls. I guess being with your fellow people you feel better about yourself inside.

Oh well I hope I got through to some of you. Some of your skulls seem to be 10 feet thick though. Can't waste my time ya know? The evidence is out there. Watch it. I could care less what conclusion you come to...it "should" be obvious...

Ehhh...BYE

don't let the door hit...oh wait, never mind...seeya!

TAM:)
 
Yes I read this. But I don't understand how the FAA can be plotting a projected position heading NE when the last known orientation was SW before the transponder was (supposedly) turned off. Trust me I'm looking into this flight explorer thing but I have severe doubts it would be plotting much anything like this. Of course this is assuming flight explorer is indeed dependent on a flights transponder as one of your "hardcore debunkers" here has said. But that would not make sense.

I think you people are really really reaching. Again we have the 1/100 chance thing. Think how much easier the explanation would be if you just admit flight 175 is still there. The plane that crashed wasn't flight 175 and there was no 1/100 coincidence. Its so easy understanding the world when you look at whats happening from truther eyes. You don't ponder why the economy is going to **** and why we are still in Iraq. You know.



You dont know anything!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tell me just what plane did hit and gee where are all those people that were on ft 175?
 
Yup. Who wants a drink?
[qimg]http://beer-ligion.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/hot_beer_girl.jpg[/qimg]

Wow! Gooood morning!

OT: did anyone tell the truther that a cartoon that shows a plane that is as large as New York City making instantaneous 160 degree turns might not be a precision scientific analysis?
 
Anyway, before this thread gets relegated to the dust bin, lets summarize.

The truthers don't know how Flight Explorer works, don't know what happens if the data is interupted, don't know whether the video tape showing Flight Explorer was live or not, and assuming it was live don't know what the data on the screen was showing, have no idea what the margin of error was, and have not talked to Flight Explorer and have no intention of doing so.

FAIL.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom