• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Abolute proof UAL 175 never struck WTC tower 2

JSSTyger said:
Pretty sad you guys all congregate at JREF where 98% of the posters are all anti-truth. Must take alot of balls. I guess being with your fellow people you feel better about yourself inside.

Oh well I hope I got through to some of you. Some of your skulls seem to be 10 feet thick though. Can't waste my time ya know? The evidence is out there. Watch it. I could care less what conclusion you come to...it "should" be obvious...

Ehhh...BYE
Click to expand...

Calling yourselves "Truthers" then calling us "anti-truth" because we're anti-you, pretty sneaky.
 
JSSTyger said:
Pretty sad you guys all congregate at JREF where 98% of the posters are all anti-truth. Must take alot of balls.
Click to expand...


No, not really. Wait... that was sarcasm, wasn't it?

But I have to laugh at that implication that you coming here, into what you must surely perceive as "hostile territory", somehow does take balls. Did you really think there was a chance you'd come out of this little skirmish horribly scarred in some way, or did you think that you would achieve some glorious victory? It's the Internet, kid.
 
JSSTyger said:
Pretty sad you guys all congregate at JREF where 98% of the posters are all anti-truth. Must take alot of balls. I guess being with your fellow people you feel better about yourself inside.

Oh well I hope I got through to some of you. Some of your skulls seem to be 10 feet thick though. Can't waste my time ya know? The evidence is out there. Watch it. I could care less what conclusion you come to...it "should" be obvious...

Ehhh...BYE
Click to expand...
How did you find such a dirt dumb video?
Total junk, does 911Truth have awards for producing dim-witted videos based on delusions? How do you find these examples of anti-intellectual twaddle?

Got any more examples of delusional based junk from 911Truth. This one is one of the dumbest, what else can you find?
That was a gem of stupid.


You failed to explain where 175 is; what hit the WTC tower, and why they found parts of 175 at the WTC, and why RADAR shows 175, the one and only 175 at the WTC. You failed.
 
Last edited:
Keep being an *******. You can't project a flight path of orientation NE based on last known transponder signal giving orientation SW. The data would have to be dependent on something else other than transponder data and I'm sure the FAA was so willing to F with the media over this that they shared with them some "back up plan" software (does not rely on transponder and much more difficult tracking) when they were supposedly just trying to get things together themselves. If the FAA loses the plane, how then do they forward such information to the media in such little time??? Remember also that the FAA could only observe blots on their radar to guess which was flight 175. There would have been no flight information transmitted though. Well...the media has flight information in that video.
Click to expand...

Hmmm. They reported the plane as hijacked, then another plane hit the WTC. It came on a northeast approach....
 
Maybe it was supposed to be "ABSOLUT" Proof. It's 80 proof or 40% etoh by volume.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
No, not really. Wait... that was sarcasm, wasn't it?

But I have to laugh at that implication that you coming here, into what you must surely perceive as "hostile territory", somehow does take balls. Did you really think there was a chance you'd come out of this little skirmish horribly scarred in some way, or did you think that you would achieve some glorious victory? It's the Internet, kid.
Click to expand...


Cross this html line, I DARE YOU. :stone027:
 
JSSTyger said:
Pretty sad you guys all congregate at JREF where 98% of the posters are all anti-truth. Must take alot of balls. I guess being with your fellow people you feel better about yourself inside.

Oh well I hope I got through to some of you. Some of your skulls seem to be 10 feet thick though. Can't waste my time ya know? The evidence is out there. Watch it. I could care less what conclusion you come to...it "should" be obvious...

Ehhh...BYE
Click to expand...


Oh, well. Bye-bye, JSSTyger. And don't forget to take the little souvenir gold medals you earned for your excellent contributions to the forum!

yellowcard.gif
yellowcard.gif
yellowcard.gif
 
JSSTyger said:
If you people jumped all over NIST's findings as you are jumping on this video evidence, you might find yourself becoming a truther. However there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of skepticism in this supposed "skeptical" forum. Being a skeptic would be more like being a truther IMO. Why does nobody here seem in the least bit skeptical of the official accounts (FEMA, 911commissh, NIST)? I have lots of questions about 911 and to put it simply I think its pathetic that you people don't!
Click to expand...

You're so cute when you're angry.
 
JSSTyger said:
The evidence is out there. Watch it.
Click to expand...

Ahhhhhh.....precious. Youtube videos = hardcore evidence. How quaint.

Nighty night lil' truther. Sleep well and don't let the bedbugs bite.

*HyJinX tossles JSST's hair and tucks him in*
 
911files said:
Let me just say this and I'll leave it to folks to argue about. Flight Explorer data was essentially a web-based Traffic Situation Display (TSD). It functions off of flight plan information, NOT real-time actual radar data. I find the UAL175 tag rather odd myself, especially since the original flight plan went nowhere near the area indicated. If you want to call a displayed flight plan (which is not an actual plane) absolute proof of something, then be my guest. The looney bin has plenty of room for all.
Click to expand...

Yeah this is exactly the same thing that the other link talked about that I posted in page #3 of this thread. In the case of Flight 93, the flight plan was adjusted just before it crashed to Washington National, and the flight plan remained active even after the plane crashed (causing the scare some 20 minutes after the plane had crashed). My guess is that before Flight 175 crashed and when it turned around to fly north, it was assumed that it was headed back to the airport and the flight plan adjusted to Boston.
 
JSSTyger said:
Pretty sad you guys all congregate at JREF where 98% of the posters are all anti-truth. Must take alot of balls. I guess being with your fellow people you feel better about yourself inside.

Oh well I hope I got through to some of you. Some of your skulls seem to be 10 feet thick though. Can't waste my time ya know? The evidence is out there. Watch it. I could care less what conclusion you come to...it "should" be obvious...

Ehhh...BYE
Click to expand...

Well, if it makes you feel better, I abolutely think you got through to me.
 



This is Sheba. In October of last year while the vet was visiting she went into convulsions and the vet determined that she was having a stroke. We put her in a cage for observation and the vet took some samples. Sheba only made a few movements over the next few days then the vet called saying that her kidneys were in total failure and since she was 16 anyway it might be time to put her down.

My Father-in-law had to think about it because this was his one of his wife's cats from before the rescue was opened.* He felt terribly selfish because Sheba might be suffering. He resolved to take her in on Monday. (It was Friday night) Saturday morning we found that one of the older rescues had died. That afternoon Sheba was walking around like nothing had happened. About a month later, Sheba was barely moving, wheezing and looking pitiful. A few days later another cat died and the next day Sheba seemed fine. When I left this morning, I gave her a bit of sausage link and she pounced on it like a kitten... Well a Kitten with one fang, and to be honest it was more of a very quick shuffle than a pounce but, you get the idea.

Now then, using the logic expressed in the OP and throughout this thread, (Looking through the eyes of a truther) Sheba is a vampire.




* Better explained here. http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134873
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom