Merged Abolute proof UAL 175 never struck WTC tower 2

JSSTyger

Scholar
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
103
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UuH6D4pob8

1) Tower 2 is down
2) Very few planes on the radar screen (for those who are still skeptical)
3) Plane is headed back to Boston (further proof the FAA had already given the command to ground all aircraft)
4) This is a national news media broadcast

Any questions?
 
Why don't you refute the evidence that was presented instead of labeling me a no-planer and scoffing. I never said a plane didn't hit the building.
 
Why don't you refute the evidence that was presented instead of labeling me a no-planer and scoffing. I never said a plane didn't hit the building.

Why? You have already proven you are disinterested in hearing reality based on your "efforts" in the David Chandler thread.
 
First off could you make it any harder to read?

Second, when will you be presenting this evidence to the authorities?
 
The Truth movement is like Dante's Inferno, except in place of the Seven levels of Damnation they have Seven Levels of Craziness.
In the Truthers inferno, the No Planers inhabit the Seventh Level.
 
First off could you make it any harder to read?

Second, when will you be presenting this evidence to the authorities?

First off how the H do I make it easier to read??? I don't think they broadcasted it in HD. Is that my fault? Besides. You can't make out the "UAL 175...BOS...LAX"??
 
I had to troll

98% of people on JREF forums are pro-official account. One thread simply isn't enough.

You know, of course, that a great many Truthers consider the No Planers to be kooks?
ANd consdiering how kooky the Truth movement in general is, that takes a special kind of insanity.
 
First off how the H do I make it easier to read???
Find a clearer vid.

I don't think they broadcasted it in HD.

Lot's of shows weren't but they still have a clearer picture than that.

Is that my fault?

Did you even look for better quality video?

Besides. You can't make out the "UAL 175...BOS...LAX"??

Barley on the side shots, not at all with the cursor goes over the planes.
 
That's hardly empirical evidence. For example, do you know how Flight Explorer copes when the flow of data is interrupted?
 

Back
Top Bottom