Bigfoot on video? Memorial Day 1996

[kitakaze]

Some dufus buddies for Sweaty's dufus video:

The arms are simply too long and the creature too agile to be a human:



She's so sincere:



That's no mangy bear!:



This what Bigfoot sounds like when he can't get into the can of beans:



Humanoid in the enchanted forest:



Unknown creature:



Romania Bigfoot:



Video taken along Interstate in WI;

 

[kitakaze]

Lori continued running the camcorder, for a minute or so, roughly...searching the wooded area for the subject after it disappeared from view.

She also called what she thought was a guy with a pack on "dickfoot."

 

[TjW]

I don't pretend to any special expertise in video analysis; in fact, I don't have any at all. That said, to my layman's eyes, it's pretty obviously a guy running, wearing a loose-fitting jacket.

Next video.

I'd think a "Ghilly suit" myself, but I suppose it could be a Rastafarian Bigfoot.

 

[SweatyYeti]

I'm astounded you still milk this subject.

No need to be astounded, mikey....it's an interesting video....with a multiple witness sighting attached to it....and no evidence provided by any skeptics to support an alternate explanation for the lifted object.

Bottom line....there is reason to think this video may be a legitimate Bigfoot video, so, to me, it has value.

Let the analysis continue......

 

[Crowlogic]

Nonsense. Just because details in one video can't be made out doesn't mean every other bigfoot video must also have the same lack of detail....even though most do. In other words, just because only a few disturbed individuals can see rippling muscles on Patty doesn't mean what appears to be a jacket can't be seen on the MDF footage. It's not like he said he could see the zipper on the jacket.

Whatever one "believes" is in the MDF, it sure as heck doesn't look like a bigfoot. Anyone who sees bigfoot there likely sees bigfoot in their cereal.

Hmmm a few disturbed individuals wow what a concept! Actually it was William cuffs observations that are verging on the poetic edge of observation. The resolution of the PGF is light years better than the MDF. I don't see any cuffs, I don't see any hair, I see a BLO "biped like object" and I don't really care one way or the other.

 

[kitakaze]

Moving Sweaty's OT silliness and subsequent schooling here where it belongs:

xblade wrote:

As a child, the Patterson flick freaked me out.

Thank you very much, xblade......for supporting one of the details surrounding the Mem. Day Video....the kid expressing how he felt, when he said...

"I'm freaked!"

That's exactly how it would feel, especially for a kid, if you think you're about to see an ape-man, live and 'in person'.

Nice try, Desperado. You mean the kid who says "I'm freaked" but it feels more like "I'm stoked." He sounds pretty calm, no? Yes, those words right before we hear "I could make a million bucks" followed by snickering. Followed by the tipsy adults remarking on how much they've had to drink. Then the kid who is scared witless according to Sweaty's implication saying "'kay, I'm going up there." That's not long before we hear "looks like a white boy to me" then "that's a guy with a big pack on his back too."

But it get's better! Then Sweaty's traumatized child says "that's not a Bigfoot" with the same tone Sweaty deserves to hear over and over now followed by tipsy Lori saying "it's a dickfoot." Not only that, then we hear "that's that wall tent up there. Probably where he's going to." The boy then says what seems to be "I wouldn't think Bigfoot is (closer?) than me."

If anybody in all of Bigfootery ever deserved this with his gifs and scribbles 13 years after this most useless piece of "compelling Bigfoot evidence" it is Sweaty...

You earned it big time:



SweatyYeti, true Bigfoot Desperado.

 

[Skeptical Greg]

Sweaty, if you really want to gather evidence for this, and you think Tom Lines' testimony on LMS is so great - find out where the pictures are that Lines said he took ...

 

[SweatyYeti]

Sweaty, if you really want to gather evidence for this, and you think Tom Lines' testimony on LMS is so great - find out where the pictures are that Lines said he took ...

That's a good idea...I'll look into it.

Do you know if anyone from one of the boards has asked Tom if they could see them?

 

[I Am He]

Well....there is a significant difference in size, or mass, between an infant primate and a mask......is there not?

The lifted object in the video, to me, appears to be too massive to be a simple mask, or a hood.
One way to tell which object....infant or mask....more closely resembles the lifted object....is to try making a videotape, from the same distance as Lori was from the subject, using the same type of camcorder (Larry told me the make and model number of the camcorder)....of a person dressed in a black suit against a green background (an open hillside, preferably), lifting-up a mask...and then, another video of the subject lifting-up something comparable to an infant, like a stuffed animal, and putting it onto it's shoulders.

One of those will much more closely resemble what the MD Video shows.


BTW...I do have a full unedited version of the video, with soundtrack.

Lori continued running the camcorder, for a minute or so, roughly...searching the wooded area for the subject after it disappeared from view.

Steaty, please read what I asked you:
"Sweaty, you said you were going to continue to analyze the video? You have the original, I presume? Oh, since I last asked about your expertise in this field, you said that you had none. Have you since taken a course? If not, prey tell how are you going to analyze it?"

Did I ask you if you had an unedited copy? All that tap dancing you are doing means nothing unless you have some kind of expertise, so did you or did you not take a course? Thank you.




I Am He

 

[makaya325]

When i first say the memorial day footage, i couldnt stop shaking my head. Its clearly a hoax, and the costume was found. What amazes me is that someone could run pretty fast sweating in an ape suit without tripping, and growing a couple inches taller!

 

[GT/CS]

When i first say the memorial day footage, i couldnt stop shaking my head. Its clearly a hoax, and the costume was found. What amazes me is that someone could run pretty fast sweating in an ape suit without tripping, and growing a couple inches taller!

Where and when was the costume found?

 

[kitakaze]

When i first say the memorial day footage, i couldnt stop shaking my head. Its clearly a hoax, and the costume was found.

*leans in, listens intently*

 

[kitakaze]

Sweaty, I know you've got your work cut out with so many so many poor arguments being annihilated and so many things to dodge but I'm curious what sidestep you'll have for post #166 when you get the time. Really stupid gif, maybe?

 

[makaya325]

Where and when was the costume found?

That costume they used was the same one i got from party city, only that the one in the film was tighter on the person. When they took off the mask, all of that afro made their height sky rocket

 

[kitakaze]

That costume they used was the same one i got from party city, only that the one in the film was tighter on the person.

Evidence?

 

[makaya325]

Evidence?

I thought you dont need evidence for a suit?! Lol, glad to see your opening up kitz

http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/19011.jpg

What you would use is, instead of a mask, you would use a face mask with a hood tightened over it. You would have to find someone large enough to make the suit appear tight

 

[kitakaze]

I thought you dont need evidence for a suit?! Lol, glad to see your opening up kitz

http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/19011.jpg

I never claimed the MDF is a suit. You did and that it was found. I asked for evidence and that link is not it.

What you would use is, instead of a mask, you would use a face mask with a hood tightened over it. You would have to find someone large enough to make the suit appear tight

I don't know what you're seeing nor do I care. It's not a problem I should fix.

 

[GT/CS]

I thought you dont need evidence for a suit?! Lol, glad to see your opening up kitz

http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/19011.jpg

What you would use is, instead of a mask, you would use a face mask with a hood tightened over it. You would have to find someone large enough to make the suit appear tight

But how do you know a similar suit was worn by the kid in the Memorial Day video? The footage is too grainy so see that sort of detail so do you have some inside information regarding the person and the suit?

 

[wolftrax]

I'm not resistant to looking at any frames of the MD Video.

There are a couple of frames, right after the lift, in which the subject/lifted object do appear dimmer, or faded, in intensity.
But, right after those 2 or 3 frames, the subject and lifted object become just as dark as they were before.
The reason for that is most likely that the subject passed behind some type of light-colored plant growth, located on the berm (closer in the foreground), that's obscuring the lower half of the subject.


The fact of the matter is....there are 2 separate pieces of evidence, showing definitively, that there was a lifted object, of some kind.

1) The sudden, and very distinct, increase in the subject's height.

and...

2) In ALL of the frames after the lift...the subject's head is shaped differently than it is in ALL of the frames before the lift, from the start of the video.
The reason for this is very simple....there is a lifted object, placed either on the subject's head, or on it's shoulders.

(I think it's an infant placed on the shoulders. [qimg]http://mail.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/05.gif[/qimg] )


You can happily ignore these facts, wolftrax, and believe "it's all an illusion", caused by ONE stationary dark spot in the background.....but you're only kidding yourself.

Well, here is the figure going in front of the dark spot, causing it to look like a rise, yet after it passes by that spot it losses that height and it is apparent it was just the dark spot.

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=15703&view=findpost&p=340091

If you claim that it retains it's height, show the frames in sequence that support this.

I know, it's off topic, but hey, it is Memorial Day!

BTW, Sweaty, are you still holding the belief that the Skookum cast was made by a saquatch?

 

[William Parcher]

The reason for this is very simple....there is a lifted object, placed either on the subject's head, or on it's shoulders.

(I think it's an infant placed on the shoulders.)

It was about a year ago that I made this crude graphic showing that what Sweaty thinks is an infant on the shoulders - would be much larger than any infant. If it is a Bigfoot sitting on a Bigfoot's shoulder, then the sitter is amazingly large when you plot out the legs dangling off the shoulder.

The image on the left was provided by Sweaty, and mine is on the right. Sweaty had nothing to say about my estimation.

How can that be an infant when it is so damn big?