Bigfoot on video? Memorial Day 1996

Sweaty, you said you were going to continue to analyze the video? You have the original, I presume? Oh, since I last asked about your expertise in this field, you said that you had none. Have you since taken a course? If not, prey tell how are you going to analyze it?



I Am He
 
I Am He said:
Sweaty, you said you were going to continue to analyze the video? You have the original, I presume? Oh, since I last asked about your expertise in this field, you said that you had none. Have you since taken a course? If not, prey tell how are you going to analyze it?


I Am He
Click to expand...



Well....there is a significant difference in size, or mass, between an infant primate and a mask......is there not?

The lifted object in the video, to me, appears to be too massive to be a simple mask, or a hood.
One way to tell which object....infant or mask....more closely resembles the lifted object....is to try making a videotape, from the same distance as Lori was from the subject, using the same type of camcorder (Larry told me the make and model number of the camcorder)....of a person dressed in a black suit against a green background (an open hillside, preferably), lifting-up a mask...and then, another video of the subject lifting-up something comparable to an infant, like a stuffed animal, and putting it onto it's shoulders.

One of those will much more closely resemble what the MD Video shows.


BTW...I do have a full unedited version of the video, with soundtrack.

Lori continued running the camcorder, for a minute or so, roughly...searching the wooded area for the subject after it disappeared from view.
 
I'm not exactly in the corner that the MDF is a real Sasquatch. However if its a hoax done by person/persons to fool unsuspectiong onlookers below its fails in one crucial detail. Why, why,why,why,why would a hoaxer begin to remove a costume while still within eye/camera shot of the people towards which the hoax is aimed?

If its not hoax and just a person running across a hillside then the person could have stopped in the middle of the run, dropped thier draws and mooned the crowd and it matters not at all. But that's not the case its an odd peice of video for certain. ANd remember this kids nobody has come forward to claim they were the hoax or that they were the object filmed in the MDF. So in that respect it has a leg up on the PGF, and we all know the PGF is real.
 
It looks like there is a loose jacket thing going on - maybe even coming off. For a moment, you can see the bottoms of the baggy pants.

mdf_moving.gif
 
SweatyYeti said:
Lori continued running the camcorder, for a minute or so, roughly...searching the wooded area for the subject after it disappeared from view.
Click to expand...

Any tracks or trail?

Let me guess

I went to a picnic and all I got was this lousy hoaxed BF video.
 
William Parcher said:
It looks like there is a loose jacket thing going on - maybe even coming off. For a moment, you can see the bottoms of the baggy pants.

[qimg]http://www.bigfootencounters.com/images/mdf_moving.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...


William I want you to know that by claiming to be able to see anything at all beyond a dark biped you have fortited any right to calim that details can't be seen in the PGF because of poor resolution.
 
Crowlogic said:
I'm not exactly in the corner that the MDF is a real Sasquatch. However if its a hoax done by person/persons to fool unsuspectiong onlookers below its fails in one crucial detail. Why, whywhy, why, why would a hoaxer begin to remove a costume while still within eye/camera shot of the people towards which the hoax is aimed?
Click to expand...


Good question, Crow....it makes no sense for the subject to do that, if he was running across the hillside as an attempt to hoax the people down below.

The 'line of sight' runs both ways....when the subject re-appeared, so did the lake and the campers down below, from his perspective.


This is just one of the many details surrounding the event that I'll list, in the Mid-America thread, to be discussed/analysed from a standpoint of logic.



But that's not the case its an odd peice of video for certain.
Click to expand...


There are a few odd things in the video, and that's what sets it apart from other low-resolution "Bigfoot" videos.
 
SweatyYeti said:
This is just one of the many details surrounding the event that I'll list, in the Mid-America thread, to be discussed/analysed from a standpoint of logic.
Click to expand...

Typical Sweaty logic. The most simple logic evades you. If it was a hoax it is very easy to explain that the costume wearer simply didn't know they were still visible when the reappeared from they behind the hill for a brief moment. :mgduh
 
Last edited:
Here is a link to the audio..

http://www.bigfootforums.com/media/Memorial_Day_Footage_Audio.mp3

One female voice is heard to say:

" ...that's a guy with a big pack on his back too .. "

Why should we dismiss her eyewitness testimony ?


Another oddity:

Toward the end, shortly after Tom Lines supposedly saw ' long flowing hair ' through some binoculars, we hear a male voice say:

" I got the binoculars Tom .. "

Tom also says he got pictures. Tom didn't mention having a camera or taking pictures, in his testimony for LMS ..

What if Tom did take pictures, and they ruled out a Bigfoot ? That would be a very good reason why we have never seen them ..

Rick Noll ignored my questions about pictures, over at BFF ..
 
Last edited:
Crowlogic said:
William I want you to know that by claiming to be able to see anything at all beyond a dark biped you have fortited any right to calim that details can't be seen in the PGF because of poor resolution.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. Just because details in one video can't be made out doesn't mean every other bigfoot video must also have the same lack of detail....even though most do. In other words, just because only a few disturbed individuals can see rippling muscles on Patty doesn't mean what appears to be a jacket can't be seen on the MDF footage. It's not like he said he could see the zipper on the jacket.

Whatever one "believes" is in the MDF, it sure as heck doesn't look like a bigfoot. Anyone who sees bigfoot there likely sees bigfoot in their cereal.
 
SweatyYeti said:
Well....there is a significant difference in size, or mass, between an infant primate and a mask......is there not?

The lifted object in the video, to me, appears to be too massive to be a simple mask, or a hood.
One way to tell which object....infant or mask....more closely resembles the lifted object....is to try making a videotape, from the same distance as Lori was from the subject, using the same type of camcorder (Larry told me the make and model number of the camcorder)....of a person dressed in a black suit against a green background (an open hillside, preferably), lifting-up a mask...and then, another video of the subject lifting-up something comparable to an infant, like a stuffed animal, and putting it onto it's shoulders.

One of those will much more closely resemble what the MD Video shows.


BTW...I do have a full unedited version of the video, with soundtrack.

Lori continued running the camcorder, for a minute or so, roughly...searching the wooded area for the subject after it disappeared from view.
Click to expand...

I'm astounded you still milk this subject.
 
HJFC, just use some common sense, Sweaty! There is no way a 300#+ biped would be able to run like that. That is a young male human, and a fairly agile one, but one who is out of shape because he starts sucking gas at the end.
 
Diogenes said:
Here is a link to the audio..

http://www.bigfootforums.com/media/Memorial_Day_Footage_Audio.mp3
Click to expand...

Oh man! That's fantastic. I am thinking of Doug Hajicek and the editors for LMS. In the beginning of LMS they show a quick cut of the MDF with Lori Pate saying "You don't see him right there?" Right before that on the Audio track you hear "Looks like a white boy to me," then "That's a guy with a big pack on his back too." I guess Doug decided that didn't quite capture the mood he was going for.

I enjoying thinking of Sweaty listening to that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom