Heliport tower ATC Sean Boger: ultimate validation of the north side approach

[jaydeehess]

bolds mine

Originally Posted by TheLoneBedouin

Although Sean has also claimed that he watched the plane go into the building we know this is impossible since he saw it on the north side. He says he hit the deck so logic would dictate that he did this as the plane hit and deduced the impact considering all other witnesses corroborate his north side claim..

Of course TLB can't possibly mean that Boger ducked "as the plane hit" since that would require that the plane actually hit the building.
One wonders then how far back from the Pentagon wall it was when Boger supposedly ducked. Boger describes the plane as getting lower and lower so he has to duck before the pull up starts. Turcois states that the plane went below his line of sight beyond the highway , so now we know that the supposed pul up occurs some time after it clears Hwy 27.

 

[twinstead]

Turcois states that the plane went below his line of sight beyond the highway , so now we know that the supposed pul up occurs some time after it clears Hwy 27.

Wow. Holy G-Force, Batman!

 

[Bobert]

bolds mine


Of course TLB can't possibly mean that Boger ducked "as the plane hit" since that would require that the plane actually hit the building.
One wonders then how far back from the Pentagon wall it was when Boger supposedly ducked. Boger describes the plane as getting lower and lower so he has to duck before the pull up starts. Turcois states that the plane went below his line of sight beyond the highway , so now we know that the supposed pul up occurs some time after it clears Hwy 27.

WOW that quote you included by TLB is just utter stupidity on top of insanity.
This is how the CULT that is CIT operates.
Could you imagine Boger in court with the CIT
Boger: I saw the plane hit the building and I will never forget seeing that or the noise.
Ranke: OBJECTION YOUR HONOR! The plane flew on the North!!!!!!
Judge: overuled.

 

[DGM]

Wow. Holy G-Force, Batman!

Actually a theory that the lawn rolled back and the plane flew under the Pentagon would be more reasonable (I shouldn't give them any ideas ).

 

[nicepants]

Actually a theory that the lawn rolled back and the plane flew under the Pentagon would be more reasonable (I shouldn't give them any ideas ).

Why didn't I see it before?

It was the only way the plane could have safely avoided the explosion and it's the reason that there are photos of a large section of the lawn with no plane parts.

This evidence proves a Landscape Deception.

Looking forward to seeing their latest video: "Pedro and his LeafBlower....the eyebrow of the storm"

 

[DGM]

Why didn't I see it before?

It was the only way the plane could have safely avoided the explosion and it's the reason that there are photos of a large section of the lawn with no plane parts.

This evidence proves a Landscape Deception.

Looking forward to seeing their latest video: "Pedro and his LeafBlower....the eyebrow of the storm"

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/141894990969467e83.jpg[/qimg]

I can see them now scouring over the photos looking for a "seam".

 

[jaydeehess]

Actually a theory that the lawn rolled back and the plane flew under the Pentagon would be more reasonable (I shouldn't give them any ideas ).

I have been trying for a few years now to get CiT to realize that the plane had secret alien tech on board that allowed it to vibrate its constituient strings (ala string theory) such that it slipped under the Pentagon, via the other 9 or so dimensionsthat SS theory predicts, and emerged somewhere between Florida and Bermuda.

Too much like math I suppose because no one has ever taken me up on it.

 

[Bobert]

The CIT boys continue to be the dumbest investigators on the planet!
Now they claim that a WTC witness is s plant because he had a bit part in a 1987 movie!
EEEEEK!!!
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=513
And Craig of course continues with the Jew hate

 

[bje]

The CIT boys continue to be the dumbest investigators on the planet!
Now they claim that a WTC witness is s plant because he had a bit part in a 1987 movie!
EEEEEK!!!
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=513
And Craig of course continues with the Jew hate

So Ranke has given up on the Pentagon and switched to spook identification in NYC?

No doubt that is supposed to be Mark Roberts in the green and white cap in the third photo.

 

[jhunter1163]

Actor who supports 9/11 Truth (Daniel Sunjata) - Hero

Actor who supports official story (Harley Guy) - Plant/disinfo/shill

Do I have that right?

 

[Bobert]

YES Cult leader Ranke has spoken therefore its true.

 

[twinstead]

I'm still aghast that the title of this thread contains the words "ultimate validation".

Ouch.

 

[jaydeehess]

Oh wow, the CiT simply never fail to entertain.

It si the actor/ it isn't the actor but he just gotta be a 'plant' because he correctly deduced that the fire weakened the steel sufficiently to caused the already weakened building to collapse. Such educated guess work is a 'red flag'.

 

[Bobert]

Oh man the CIT CULT is startintg to eat their own!
In the "Enemies" thread a poster is calling for truthers who disagree with the CIT CULT to also have their pictures posted.
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=508&st=30
And in this thread
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=516&view=getnewpost
You get some great crying by Ranke about how Prison Plant and 911blogger wont give their CULT the attention they so crave

For anyone new to the info who might end up reading this the reason we are mad is because PP and Blogger are happy to report on this unverifiable government provided anonymous alleged witness account but ignore the scores of first-hand on-location testimony we have provided proving that that C-130 wasn't in the airspace until about 3 minutes after the attack BUT that it came from a northwesterly direction fatally contradicting the 2007 released alleged radar data.

OH MAN This is the greatest SOAP EVER!
"As the CIT CULT turns"

 

[jhunter1163]

For anyone new to the info who might end up reading this the reason we are mad is because PP and Blogger are happy to report on this unverifiable government provided anonymous alleged witness account but ignore the scores of first-hand on-location testimony we have provided proving that that C-130 wasn't in the airspace until about 3 minutes after the attack BUT that it came from a northwesterly direction fatally contradicting the 2007 released alleged radar data.

13 is now scores?

I might be math-challenged, but I can calculate that 13 is actually .65 of a score.

 

[chillzero]

Post on topic, or the thread will be closed. This is not for pursuing cross-forum vendettas.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

post on topic or the thread will be closed.

chillzero,

Respectfully, that would not be a punishment for the offenders. In fact you have just empowered them to achieve this as a goal.

 

[nicepants]

TLB- Now that this thread is back open:

What did Mr. Boger say when CIT told him that the plane couldn't have impacted if it flew NOC?

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

TLB- Now that this thread is back open:

What did Mr. Boger say when CIT told him that the plane couldn't have impacted if it flew NOC?

The thread was never closed.

Why don't you ask CIT yourself?

Or better yet why don't you ask Sean Boger yourself?

 

[bje]

The thread was never closed.

Why don't you ask CIT yourself?

You're the one making the claims for CIT.

Or better yet why don't you ask Sean Boger yourself?

We don't do your homework.