Any and all your posts on this topic refuse to admit the possibility that people who disagree with you can do so on an intellectually sound basis: your response to cogent arguments for an investigation directly above your own is a casual dismissal and intellectually cowardly.
No, your hysterical bias and
need to hate and blame George Bush for something along with the refusal to admit that you have no evidence nor reason to believe this sort of lunatic fringe insanity except that you are a partisan hack means that you have no argument here. Nice try. Screaming GEORGE BUSH WAR CRIMES because you can't remove your partisan colored glasses won't make it anymore real, and your witch hunt will never come to fruition because while Obama fostered your hatred to get elected, he knows there is nothing of substance there and it would backfire on him.
Were there even a remote possibility that any of the contrived allegations were true, Obama would capitalize on it instantly. He knows there is a direct relation to the amount of Bush hatred he can stir up and his own popularity - he used it to get elected. If he thought he could distract the population by putting on a political circus and stirring up your kind of hatred for Bush, it would already be underway. But he knows the facts - there is nothing there.
People can support the idea that the Bush administration committed crimes worthy of investigation without being "loony lefties" or whatever other disparaging term you use to short-circuit discussion and place yourself on a pedestal of "not" drinking "kool-aid".
The truth hurts, and its good to see it hurts you so bad. When you are just as hysterical about investigating Bill Clinton for war crimes in Bosnia, then maybe I can take you seriously. Until then, you continue to prove that you have nothing to offer but left-wing fringe propaganda.
You can likely do a lot better than whipping out the easy epithets, don't you think?
Actually thats all you are doing - but hey, it lets me know I'm on to something when you get this enraged
Here's a challenge: you're entirely welcome to disagree with my posts and the posts of others on this topic, the challenge to you is - can you do so coherently, without using the terms "left-wing", "kool-aid" and "kook"? Can you do so with respect for the individual who holds an opposing view?
You have shown you are a left-wing lunatic - if you don't want the label, don't act like one.
Or has it become a habit you can't kick - to cast your opponents in the most unfavourable/disrespectful light possible?
Yes it seems like its something you can't stop yourself from doing. As soon as someone points out the propaganda you are spreading, you fly of the handle and start foaming at the mouth over it.
Creating a political circus to satisfy your partisan needs to turn someone into a scape goat is always stupid. I'll consider you as something other than a partisan hack when you start screaming about investigating Barack Obama for war crimes during the recent Israel/Palestine conflict and Bill Clinton for war crimes in Bosnia. Of course, then you'd just be a truther - but frankly I'm more likely to listen to truthers by a fraction of a inch than I am lunatic left-wingers or right-wingers.
