Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

[Bananaman]

Nurse, nurse, CrazyChris has woken up and needs his medication. Nurse, quickly, before he has one of his seizures...

Bananaman.

 

[dtugg]

Have twoofers ever given an explanation that makes any sense for why the NWO blew up WTC7?

 

[Disbelief]

What?

Daryl heard an explosion, saw a shock wave rip thru the building and all the windows busted out. That is evidence of an explosion.

It is not proof, it is just one piece of evidence.

It is not evidence of explosives though. I see you conveniently cropped the rest of my post, so I am to assume you will continue to be a keyboard warrior instead of talking with the FDNY?

 

[Christopher7]

Just placing those two comments in closer juxtaposition. Presenting facts is fine; it's the statements of belief and spurious lines of reasoning that tend to garner the insults.
Dave

No, the insults are ubiquitous but ICCL.

Will you acknowledge this fact?

Daryl heard an explosion and saw a shock wave rip thru the building.

 

[JimBenArm]

No, the insults are ubiquitous but ICCL.

Will you acknowledge this fact?

Daryl heard an explosion and saw a shock wave rip thru the building.

Is that what he told you when you interviewed him?

 

[psikeyhackr]

The saddest thing about the nutbars' WTC 7 claims is that thousands of people, including numerous experts in engineering, demolitions, and building collapses, were on the scene watching WTC 7, waiting for its collapse, eager to get back to rescue work on the piles.

Meanwhile, reality remains unperturbed. Please do not encourage trolls by arguing with them.

I don't quite understand that statement.

Are you accusing the "nutbars" of saying that "thousands" of people were expecting the building to come down.

Or are you saying that "thousands" of people were expecting the building to come down and the "nutbars" don't know it but they are supposed to.

In either case would you provide a link to support and clarify that statement.

psik

 

[psikeyhackr]

Interesting, why bother to read and educate yourself using whole context when you can quote mine using commonly available software.

.
How much education does it take to figure out that a 110 story building must support its own weight throughout its entire height and the people who design such buildings must figure out how much steel and concrete to put where? The people who finance such buildings must be given reasonable cost estimates before they will put up the money therefore much of that had to be figured out before they started digging the holes for the foundations.

So why can't nitwits that spend 3 years creating a 10,000 page report tell us the TONS of STEEL an TONS of CONCRETE on every level? And SEVEN YEARS later we still don't have it from an official source. Curious that Richard Gage, an architect, isn't demanding it but claims that the NIST won't release accurate blueprints.

Instead they tell us the towers were 70% air by volume.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/cons-flash.html

ROFLMAO

psik

 

[Grizzly Bear]

I quoted NIST.

NIST L pg 33
"The simultaneous failure of screenwall and west penthouse structures"

NIST L pg 27
7.0 sceonds
West penthouse and screenwall begin to move downward into building
Movement of entire north face of WTC7 (visible above Floor 21)

I'll have to look at the relevant section of the final report, but I'll acknowledge at least a partial mistake from misreading your original post which I thought referred to both the east and the west penthouse. My mistake... The use of an older report and your leaving out of the east penthouse are still problematic, and are addressed accordingly.


But...

I prefer to talk about the specific facts at hand. You-all prefer similes, metaphors, idioms, figures of speech, turns of phrase, and the like to fog the truth.

Example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9Sy...com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=4422169

Gravy implied that the clap of thunder Daryl heard was just a column snapping despite the FACT he knew the progressive collapse NIST was proposing lasted about 15 seconds.

Good point.

I forgot to say "NIST claims it was a progressive collapse occurring over a period of 7-8 seconds."

This does not match the video evidence which clearly shows the screenwall and west penthouse failing simultaneously.

Can you at least make your claims more consistent? You're bouncing all over the place there....

 

[rwguinn]

Think of it this way, guys:
C7 has just proved the existence of god. How else would all those explosions occur during a thunderstorm? what non-paranormal entity could place that many explosives--and in and around clouds no less!

:
The only explanation for the clap of thunder is an explosion.

 

[nicepants]

Correct

He was implying that what Daryl heard was a column breaking.

No...he was demonstrating that when a steel crane collapsed, it generated a noise that eyewitnesses reported sounded like a bomb going off (explosion)

What Daryl heard was an explosion.

That's what people who heard the collapsing crane thought they heard.

It could not have been a column breaking because a progressive collapse is a series of columns failing.

Didn't you claim that all of the columns failed at once?

Daryl heard an explosion, saw a shock wave rip thru the building and all the windows busted out.

This claim is proven false by videos of the collapse.

Instead they tell us the towers were 70% air by volume.
ROFLMAO

What's a typical %age for the volume of air in a high-rise office building?

 

[Cuddles]

Since there are no attempts to stay on topic despite my previous warning, thead closed.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles