Just out of curiosity, does C7 have any evidence of 4 ton anythings being "hurled" or "ejected" 600 feet horizontally?
I don't mean anything that obviously fell over from around 600 feet like it peeled away from the structure, but something being "hurled" 600 feet?
It is known that portions of the exterior of the North Tower (WTC 1) were found embedded in World Financial Center 3;
here's Ref's page on that series of buildings (a picture of WTC 1 debris stuck in WFC 3 is about midway down that page), and here are a couple of maps of the World Trade Center complex and surrounding buildings, just to give you an idea of the layout of the place:
The first one is just a flat overhead rendering, and
the second, while not quite to scale, is scaled enough horizontally to demonstrate the height of the towers relative to some (not all) neighboring buildings. I don't know how far that part of WFC 3 is from the North Tower, but it is across West Street, so it's not like it's right up against it.
But anyway, you've hit the nail on the head with your observation: The pieces found well away from the towers were indeed a fair distance away, but they also had most likely fallen from quite a distance up. From the image linked above on Ref's page, you can see that the debris "tore" a path down the side of WFC 3. On top of that, more debris was found on the roof of WFC 3, and while it's possible that debris travelling more or less horizontally could also park itself there, the simplicity of pieces falling from a great height and landing up top survives Occam's Razor better. Anyway, the Twin Towers were what, around 1,300 feet tall? What's more likely in comparison, that the piece came from high above, especially considering the damage path it created, and the fact that other debris landed on the roof? Or that it came rather horizontally?
To make the argument that the ejection was indeed an ejection, you have to be looking at a flat map and ignoring all else.
I don't think anyone knows for sure which floor the debris hitting WFC 3 came from, but the bottom line is that unless someone can demonstrate that it travelled more laterally than what can be expected when simply falling from that height, then there's no argument for explosive ejection of that piece. The fact that pieces of the external cladding were found in buildings across the street doesn't mean demolitions "ejected" them. It means nothing more than that the piece fell from a great distance up, and that some element in the chaotic collapse - perhaps a simple outward bowing from the impact of the upper floor forcing it outward to begin with, or perhaps impact with another piece of debris or part of the yet-to-be impacted part of the tower - caused it to fall further away from the base of the tower than other debris. It did not have to be an explosion, and in fact, it didn't have to be that strong a force to get it that far out relative to the height it likely had fallen from. Anyway, the point here is that amongst all the pieces "evidence" supporting the absurd notion of explosives use, the one about debris in neighboring buildings is only acceptible if you presume a lot. Otherwise, that "evidence" can be easily attributed to mere fall, not lateral force from demolitions.
And as a snarky aside: I've yet to hear of thermite pushing things sideways too.
