Statistical Analysis of AE911Truth Technical Articles

[GodisEnergy]

I think you have repeated or heard it been repeated so many times that " conspiracy theorists are delusional " that you have lost touch of analytical thought

 

[johnny karate]

Ever think that is YOU who are Delusional?

You mean like the FDNY whom you've claimed can't "handle the CD truth"?

 

[beachnut]

I think you have repeated or heard it been repeated so many times that " conspiracy theorists are delusional " that you have lost touch of analytical thought

911Truth conspiracy theorists are not delusional (doctor may be needed to see if they are) their ideas on 911 are delusional. You need to concentrate on your own failed ideas and figure out why you are still evidence free after 7 years on an event already solved 7 years ago.

You have zero evidence and zero proof for your ideas based on the delusional ideas of 911Truth.

The fact is you are mislead by a fringe group with no rational conclusions on 911. And after 7 years you could try to understand 911 by using evidence, not hearsay, lies and fantasies from 911Truth; your one stop shopping for delusional ideas, not people who are delusional until they see the doc.


Have you taken all your “evidence” to the police, FBI, or media to break this massive Pulitzer Prize story?

Have you done anything to break this story besides repeating delusions of 911Truth?

 

[johnny karate]

I think you have repeated or heard it been repeated so many times that " conspiracy theorists are delusional " that you have lost touch of analytical thought

In the same way you believe the FDNY to have lost touch with analytical thought?

 

[Architect]

Ever think that is YOU who are Delusional?

In all fairness, that would mean "Me" and just about every other construction professional in the world, hence you'll forgive me for not being considerably concerned about it.

 

[J. Wellington Wimpy]

who cares about gage hes a presentator.

Why is it, I wonder, that so many self-designated "critical thinkers" display all the spelling and grammatical prowess of particularly incurious seven-year-olds?

Hey: I'm "just asking questions," is all.

 

[Architect]

Why is it, I wonder, that so many self-designated "critical thinkers" display all the spelling and grammatical prowess of particularly incurious seven-year-olds?

Pot ---> kettle:

Hey: I'm "just asking questions," is all.

Now, are you bringing a substantive point to the table?

 

[Dave Rogers]

AE911 has over 30 structural engineers

The AE911 site lists 11 people who claim to be structural engineers or civil/structural engineers, and 8 engineers in other specialities who claim experience in structural engineering.

Dave

 

[J. Wellington Wimpy]

Pot ---> kettle:

That might have been a genuinely devastating rejoinder, had I been similarly illiterate. Ah, well. Next time, perhaps.

Now, are you bringing a substantive point to the table?

The same one you (evidently) missed, first time around: the plain observation that troofer "critical thinking" and illiteracy frequently appear to be, like Chang and Eng, joined at the proverbial hip. If that's not "substantive" enough a point for your liking, I imagine I'll bear up somehow regardless.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Pot ---> kettle:

Architect, I think JWW's a fellow kettle calling the pot black. Note the quote from GodisEnergy, complete with spelling and punctuation (or rather, without).

JWW, welcome to the forum, I hope you'll stay around. If you use the "quote" button, it inserts a link to the post and the poster's name, so the more hair-triggered among us can more easily spot who you're mocking.

Dave

 

[J. Wellington Wimpy]

JWW, welcome to the forum, I hope you'll stay around. If you use the "quote" button, it inserts a link to the post and the poster's name, so the more hair-triggered among us can more easily spot who you're mocking.

Dave

Thank you kindly, Dave -- both for the courteous welcome, and the excellent advice. So noted.

 

[BigAl]

Here we go again , attacking gage again. AE911 has over 30 structural engineers who cares about gage hes a presentator.

None of these engineers will speak in public and explain in terms that make sense to other engineers why they claim what they do. We don't know their conclusions are based on an accurate understanding of events or if they in fact speak within their area of competency.

None of them will address relevant questions from their professional peers.
Gage won't.

 

[GodisEnergy]

Really , no i think your misunderstood . They won't take lame questions from jref debunkers cultists.
They will take questions from Proffesionals.
But noone of yall are qualified proffesionals

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Really , no i think your misunderstood . They won't take lame questions from jref debunkers cultists.

Jref debunker cultists eh? Looking at the difficulties the few legitimate truthers have undergone trying to have their pertinent questions answered and to no avail, I find that statement very narrow minded.

They will take questions from Proffesionals. But noone of yall are qualified proffesionals

As a student nearing graduation to enter the profession and with reasonable educational background in the field I am qualified enough to understand that the statements put forth by AE911 are not substantiated. Forgive me if I have trouble finding credibility in professionals who make the most basic of mistakes in their field. One would think that with a reasonable college education, and years of seasoned experience would help them to at least avoid mistakes of such insignificant calibur. They don't even do their case studies properly when they attempt to compare other structural fires to those of any of the three towers. Designers know better than to present arbitrary examples when it deals from a design standpoint.

 

[GodisEnergy]

What is the most basic of mistake they made ?

 

[Baylor]

What is the most basic of mistake they made ?

Oh for the love of God.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114090

 

[GodisEnergy]

What? no molten metal ? im not sure what you have proven?

 

[Baylor]

What? no molten metal ? im not sure what you have proven?

Good god. No wonder you're so susceptible to dirt dumb conspiracy theories. I could not have made that simpler for you. You asked what basic mistake did ae911truth make. I gave you a link that showed ae911truth's basic mistake--a mistake that they admitted to.

Were just trying to relieve your cogntive dissonance, or are you really that stupid?

 

[GodisEnergy]

whose 'they' judy shelton i disagree with her

 

[funk de fino]

But noone of yall are qualified proffesionals

And that is one more lie to add to the truthers resume. There are many qulified professionals here in many different fields.

What is your field of experience BTW?