Statistical Analysis of AE911Truth Technical Articles

[johnny karate]

GodisEnergy, why do you have such contempt for the FDNY? Is it because they heroically risk their lives to save people like you, while you do nothing of particular import with your own, and you resent that? Please tell me. The psychology behind such unbridled hostility fascinates me.

 

[GodisEnergy]

Yea but there cant be fire or explosions in building 7 if there was no fire there at that time because the towers hadnt collapsed yet.

I dont have contempt for FDNY because i beleive alot of them are closet Truthers.

 

[TexasJack]

I dont have contempt for FDNY because i beleive alot of them are closet Truthers.

Would you like to back up this belief with evidence, or should we just sum it up as the best evidence you can come up with: worthless speculation.

 

[GodisEnergy]

well i dont have a count from debunker side as to how many are anti truthers either

 

[johnny karate]

I dont have contempt for FDNY because i beleive alot of them are closet Truthers.

You admire and respect someone too afraid to come forward and tell the truth about the murder of 3,000 innocent people? You choose your role models oddly.

Or maybe you're just lying.

See, earlier you said this (bolding mine):

Im not interested in Firefighters Opinions, Opinions are biased and i dont think most of them can handle the CD truth

So first, most firefighters can't "handle the CD truth", and now a lot "are closet Truthers".

I'm not a statistician, so I'm not sure how two separate groups within the same population can be independently described as "most" and "a lot".

Perhaps you could break it down for us.

What percentage of the FDNY do you believe are too stupid to "handle the CD truth", and what percentage are "closet Truthers" too cowardly to come forward?

 

[A W Smith]

I before E except after Lies

I dont have contempt for FDNY because i beleive alot of them are closet Truthers.

Go ahead then. Contact them. Support your "beleif" The burden of proof falls on you because you make the claim.

http://www.nycfire.net/mnfiremap

You are not a coward are you? Prove to me that you are not the coward I "beleive" you are. Contact them to provide support for your beliefs.

 

[GodisEnergy]

i have my witnesses so the burden of proof is on you to find another witness who was near my witnesses at the time to contradict my witnesses statement.

 

[beachnut]

...
I dont have contempt for FDNY because i beleive alot of them are closet Truthers.

Your evidence? Not coming! No surprise.
This is why you are wrong on 9/11, your beliefs are backed by hearsay, lies, fantasy, and delusions. You have no evidence to go with your beliefs.

 

[A W Smith]

i have my witnesses so the burden of proof is on you to find another witness who was near my witnesses at the time to contradict my witnesses statement.

Jennings disagreed with you



your witnesses?
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/whattheyheard

 

[Hokulele]

In a bid to try and drag this back on topic (GiE, start your own thread to whine about witnesses)...

So what new technical perpective is Richard Gage and AE911Truth offering? Nothing. 0 (zero) of the articles are authored by Gage. They don't even host more than 2 different papers (about 5% of the articles). None of the papers are exclusively written for AE911Truth. They are just linked from their original website, be it JONES, 911review, or even 911blogger.

Has Gage ever done any original work? Even his presentation is a bunch of recycled waste paper.

 

[johnny karate]

i have my witnesses so the burden of proof is on you to find another witness who was near my witnesses at the time to contradict my witnesses statement.

But what if those witnesses are too stupid or too cowardly to discern/admit The Truth, the way you accuse the FDNY of being stupid and cowardly?

 

[ref]

In a bid to try and drag this back on topic (GiE, start your own thread to whine about witnesses)...

Thanks

Has Gage ever done any original work? Even his presentation is a bunch of recycled waste paper.

Not to my knowledge. They admitted that even his presentation is put together by some committee, not Gage himself.

All he does is present the slideshow. I even doubt it was him that came up with the cardboard box demonstration idea.

 

[Hokulele]

I even doubt it was him that came up with the cardboard box demonstration idea.

Heh. Darn, that was so loopy, I had hoped it was his.

 

[Architect]

Professionally incompetent.

 

[Shaun from Scotland]

You know to much , or at least you think you do .

Im not interested in Firefighters Opinions, Opinions are biased and i dont think most of them can handle the CD truth


There is-
WTC7 barry jennings said he heard explosions before the two towers collapsed .
And If they took down building 7 ,then IT MEANS THAT THEY KNEW TWIN TOWERS WOULD COLLAPSE INTO BUILDING 7

Any particular reason you are not interested in firefighters opinions but seem to set great store by Barry Jennings opinion?

 

[ElMondoHummus]

At risk of thread derail - because I'm no longer talking about number of articles or site of original hosting - I wonder if all or at least most of those articles have been discussed here in this forum. I well understand that most of the claims contained in those articles have been - it's not like there's anything truly new about much of that work, just differing applications of old canards - but I've not gone through the JREF archives here to see if these claims have been discussed in the context of the papers themselves.

You know, if some threads have been done, it might be interesting to make an index thread for them. Like for example taking Red's "Debunk Alert" thread for the recent MacQueen/Szamboti paper and adding that to such an index. Such a thread can be added to, and perhaps stickied.

 

[Hokulele]

I recognize a few of the papers in ref's list as having been covered, at least tangentially. Boloboffin's site may have links to refutations of the various papers a well.

 

[GodisEnergy]

Here we go again , attacking gage again. AE911 has over 30 structural engineers who cares about gage hes a presentator.

AW SMITH - i hope you understand what threats can do to people ... Change their story .
And before you laugh remember that he was killed the day before the nist report on building 7..

[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRaKHq2dfCI ]
How do you post it with the disclaimer sorry i dont know how?

[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT2dXqRscJQ ]
this is much better than griffins account good luck wt7 lies ,

 

[beachnut]

Here we go again , attacking gage again. AE911 has over 30 structural engineers who cares about gage hes a presentator.

AW SMITH - i hope you understand what threats can do to people ... Change their story .
And before you laugh remember that he was killed the day before the nist report on building 7..

[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRaKHq2dfCI ]
How do you post it with the disclaimer sorry i dont know how?

[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT2dXqRscJQ ]
this is much better than griffins account good luck wt7 lies ,

7 years after 911 and no clue, now Gage takes donations to push lies, fantasy and delusions from 911Truth. By all means keep giving money to Gage, someone needs to support him and his delusions so our tax dollars don’t have to. Delusions you can’t back with evidence. But you sure have lots of hearsay, lies and fantasy.
Gage and his group have fantasy, lies and hearsay. You have only the same, no real support for Gage. The videos are proof that Bermas has nut case ideas and can’t support them, and 911Truth has nothing after 7 years.

When you have evidence you will not longer support the delusions of 911Truth, wrong for 7-plus years.

 

[GodisEnergy]

Ever think that is YOU who are Delusional?