• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, kitz i didnt. I said that if they got shot, i would feel no sympathy for them, because they had it coming
 
makaya325 said:
No, kitz i didnt. I said that if they got shot, i would feel no sympathy for them, because they had it coming
Click to expand...

:nope:

"i wish in the future, we can see stories of more and more hoaxers get hurt"


"if they are doing this to mislead researchers and to screw with people, then i have no problem of some one kicking the crap out of them"


"some hoaxers deserve whats coming to them-a bullet. It is beyond risk to costume up and run around in trigger happy areas"

Please don't evade me. Address your contradictions pointed out in posts #614 and #615. Please use the quote function to avoid confusion.

People are seeing quite clearly you are running from your own words, you see.
 
ok

"
i wish in the future, we can see stories of more and more hoaxers get hurt"
Click to expand...

KEYWORD-HURT. Do they deserve to die? Heck no. Do they deserve to get roughed up a bit? Yes.

"
if they are doing this to mislead researchers and to screw with people, then i have no problem of some one kicking the crap out of them"
Click to expand...

Not killing, just roughing up

"
some hoaxers deserve whats coming to them-a bullet. It is beyond risk to costume up and run around in trigger happy areas
Click to expand...
"

A bullet-where? Maybe in the foot over that puffy suit?

Please don't evade me. Address your contradictions pointed out in posts #614 and #615. Please use the quote function to avoid confusion.

People are seeing quite clearly you are running from your own words, you see.[/QUOTE]
 
Hoaxers like Marx and Freeman should have been roughed up then? Why weren't they? After all, those two severely damaged bigfootery's credibility.

They certainly weren't roughed up, but believed, and in one case paid a lot of money by a certain popular professor...
 
makaya325 said:


ok
Click to expand...


Thank you, Makaya.

I believe that you're making a sincere effort to become a better poster, and deserve encouragement for doing so. If you'd like some advice on quoting people, please ask.


In response to your points about wishing harm on Footers:

This isn't a very widely-held point of view (POV) and so it will often meet with a certain amount of hostility when it's presented. You seem to have discovered this, and are now trying to backpedal from your original statement, and while this might be a good sign, it's not a winning tactic.

When you're called on something here you need to either back it up with some credible references and/or arguments in support of your point, or simply admit that you were wrong and express your thanks for the correction. Moving the goalposts is something that will get you jumped on, as you've probably realised.


The collective knowledge of this forum is awesome, but to take full advantage of it one needs to put in some effort oneself, so keep up the good work and you can look forward to being rewarded for it.


Also, if I understand an earlier question of yours with regard to rock throwing. I, along with many others here, lean towards the most likely explanation being that it's just the expedition organisers spicing things up for the punters. After all, there aren't any bigfeets.
 
Akhenaten said:
Thank you, Makaya.

I believe that you're making a sincere effort to become a better poster, and deserve encouragement for doing so. If you'd like some advice on quoting people, please ask.


In response to your points about wishing harm on Footers:

This isn't a very widely-held point of view (POV) and so it will often meet with a certain amount of hostility when it's presented. You seem to have discovered this, and are now trying to backpedal from your original statement, and while this might be a good sign, it's not a winning tactic.

When you're called on something here you need to either back it up with some credible references and/or arguments in support of your point, or simply admit that you were wrong and express your thanks for the correction. Moving the goalposts is something that will get you jumped on, as you've probably realised.


The collective knowledge of this forum is awesome, but to take full advantage of it one needs to put in some effort oneself, so keep up the good work and you can look forward to being rewarded for it.


Also, if I understand an earlier question of yours with regard to rock throwing. I, along with many others here, lean towards the most likely explanation being that it's just the expedition organisers spicing things up for the punters. After all, there aren't any bigfeets.
Click to expand...

Except al bundy's mother in law.

I gotcha. Im just fed up with hoaxing. They really need to be held responsible for their actions, and not get off the hook easily.
 
Akhenaten said:
After all, there aren't any bigfeets.
Click to expand...


makaya325 said:
Except al bundy's mother in law.
Click to expand...


:D



makaya325 said:
I gotcha. Im just fed up with hoaxing. They really need to be held responsible for their actions, and not get off the hook easily.
Click to expand...


Yeah, I hear you. It seems a huge waste of resources and some accountability for it would be wonderful, but alas, it's human nature to try and fool others. Sometimes, though, it can be good fun, so maybe we should try to restrict our fed-upness to the hoaxing-for-profit scumballs, like the ones responsible for the crappy film that this thread is about.


Which reminds me that we're off-topic, so I'll stop.


Cheers
 
Akhenaten said:
Thank you, Makaya.

I believe that you're making a sincere effort to become a better poster, and deserve encouragement for doing so. If you'd like some advice on quoting people, please ask.

(snip)
Click to expand...

I agree and am glad you posted that Akhenaten. It is encouraging to see some progress from Makaya.

Feel free with me also to ask any questions about how to quote or any other forum functions and options you want to kmow about.

I'm glad that you employed multi-quoting in your previous post. What I was asking regarding the quote was to address the contradictory statements of yours I quoted in my posts #614 and #615.

Specifically they show mutually exclusive statements regarding Bigfoot's current existence and also the use of anecdotal evidence for Bigfoot.
 
makaya325 said:
I gotcha. Im just fed up with hoaxing. They really need to be held responsible for their actions, and not get off the hook easily.
Click to expand...

You should thank the hoaxers. If not for hoaxers, there would be no bigfoot evidence at all. Then what would you do? Heck, if it weren't for the two biggest bigfoot hoaxers of all, we wouldn't even be talking about bigfoot today.
 
makaya325 said:
if a person threw rocks, why didnt they find anything?
Click to expand...

I'm guessing because they already knew who threw it...IF anything was thrown at all. Not much to find in either case.

If bigfoot threw the rock, why didn't they find anything?
 
Last edited:
xblade said:
You should thank the hoaxers. If not for hoaxers, there would be no bigfoot evidence at all. Then what would you do? Heck, if it weren't for the two biggest bigfoot hoaxers of all, we wouldn't even be talking about bigfoot today.
Click to expand...

What about the possibility of a large feral human?
 
xblade wrote:
Heck, if it weren't for the two biggest bigfoot hoaxers of all, we wouldn't even be talking about bigfoot today.
Click to expand...


Thank you xblade, for admitting to the realism of the Patterson Film subject. :)
 
SweatyYeti said:
xblade wrote:

Heck, if it weren't for the two biggest bigfoot hoaxers of all, we wouldn't even be talking about bigfoot today.
Click to expand...

Thank you xblade, for admitting to the realism of the Patterson Film subject. :)
Click to expand...

What? Where did he say anything about realism? As far as I can tell realism is in no way a requirement for something to be good evidence to a bigfoot enthusiast.
 
SweatyYeti said:
xblade wrote:



Thank you xblade, for admitting to the realism of the Patterson Film subject. :)
Click to expand...

Thank you for doing what footers often do: see something that isn't there. Well done. :)
 
Last edited:
makaya325 said:
What about the possibility of a large feral human?
Click to expand...


That's a possibility I've entertained to account for one or two sightings, but I don't recall much discussion on it. I don't know that the size matters so much, given the imagination of some observers, and I'd be interested in others' opinions on this myself.

If your question relates to the PGF, then I don't think so. That's just a normal dude in a suit.
 
Akhenaten said:
That's a possibility I've entertained to account for one or two sightings, but I don't recall much discussion on it. I don't know that the size matters so much, given the imagination of some observers, and I'd be interested in others' opinions on this myself.

If your question relates to the PGF, then I don't think so. That's just a normal dude in a suit.
Click to expand...

From 100's of yards, any human would look like a blur and size is impossible to judge. When we are dealing with reports when the animal is close, Then its harder to dismiss. Why cant we entertain the possibility that people are seeing something undiscovered, and do follow up on reports?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom