Since I have explained how the witnesses are fooled with deceptive media reports.......
Except in order for us to swallow that load we would have to believe that every single solitary witness who observed the plane fly over the Pentagon , from any angle, later read or watched on TV , or heard on the radio about the plane having hit the Pentagon
, and maybe about a second plane in the air near the Pentagon at the same time, and then decided that the second plane is what they saw and that a different aircraft which they did not see was the cause of the crash they also observed.
THE media story of the day was the crash at the Pentagon. Reports about a second plane were mere addendum to that story.
There are multiple witnesses from several angles, who saw a plane, a large, very fast, very low flying aircraft which they followed and observed it HIT the Pentagon, and reported such. None of them reported a flyover, all of them determined that the fireball occured at such a time as to be consistent with the aircraft they observed having hit the building, none of them reported that they thought it was goinmg to hit an upper floor, some describe it hitting a lower floor, some describe it hitting the lamp posts, some describe it touching the ground just in front of the Pentagon first!
ALL, every single solitary person, from all angles, who was in a position to observe the aircraft approach the building states that the plane hit the Pentagon.
__________________________________________________________
That said we can move on to the CiT/PfT complicated, complex contention that an airliner was commandeered, spirited away to parts unknown, the aircraft and persons on board killed and all disposed of, a second aircraft sent to fly over the Pentagon and drop a bomb with pin point accuracy and timing to not only cause damage consistent with a large fast mass impacting the building and tearing through it.
but also exploding such that it would create a fireball to mask the travel over the building,
while allowing the aircraft to fly low enough to fool people into believing that it hit a ground floor,
but not causing damage to this aircraft by its passage through such a fireball/debris cloud,
nor cause any vortex action to that fireball that would give away the fact that it flew through it,
and then having a third aircraft in the air nearby to allow for media reports of such an aircraft near the Pentagon to deceive all and sundry witnesses, from any angle, of the actual fly over, into thinking that this thrid aircraft is what they saw fly over the Pentagon.
During all of this 'agents' are sent to the area near the Pentagon to down lamp posts to illustrate a flight path that is grossly different that either of the two aircraft flying towards or near the Pentagon. No one at all, from any vantage point, notices these people downing these lamp posts and some people who see the posts go down somehow are deceived into believeing that they were downed by the passage of a plane that was high enough to fly over the Pentagon in a 45 degree bank (which requires the fuselage to be at least half again higher above the ground than the roofline of the Pentagon) and thus would have been easily three times the height of the lamp post.
Other 'agents' scurry about planting aircraft parts consistent with the 757 that was caused to disappear. No one sees them do this.
Furthermore the DNA of those on board is sent to the lab with the claim that it comes from investigations taking place at the Pentagon.
Sooo, LoneBedouin, does that sum up the CiT/PfT contentions or should we include an FDR that was planted even though it supposedly describes yet another flight path inconsistent with either of the two aircraft that were flying towards or near the Pentagon nor, supposedly, consistent with the path described by the downed lamp posts, on 9/11/01?
