SweatyYeti's Martian Civilization Evidence Thread
- Thread starter kitakaze
- Start date
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
I'm not lying. Here's the proof:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4281614#post4281614
I'm not stalking. That's easy to prove. If I was stalking you, I'd be engaging you in all the treads you're posting in. This is the only one. I'm participating in a debate. I'm debating what you have to say about Martian civilization. I'm offering other evidence and ideas.
You don't seem to be handling it very well.
learner
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- May 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,697
I am no expert on building, but, if the tubes are martian made, why are the rib supports spaced so irregularly? I can see why they might change spacing at bends, but generally, to the untrained eye, it all looks a bit of a bodge job. Some of them even cross over!
I felt the need to consult my mate, Dave ( odd job man and philosopher) and he said " Its a lash up, there's no way i would pay for that standard of work"
Nuff said!
I am intrigued by Kitakazes Bigfoot/mars paradigm though, Il be watching developments with a critical eye.
I felt the need to consult my mate, Dave ( odd job man and philosopher) and he said " Its a lash up, there's no way i would pay for that standard of work"
Nuff said!
I am intrigued by Kitakazes Bigfoot/mars paradigm though, Il be watching developments with a critical eye.
Last edited:
Right. Very interesting comments. Now notice when it is that the astronomers in this youtube reckon that the other moon exploded. They think that was three and a half million years ago.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=vwebbuvq4qo
Supposing that the bands are metal? Well Mars has nowhere near the amount of corrosive oxygen or liquid water. And one wonders what such banded covered tubular roads would look like after 3.5 million years of wear and tear. On earth they would be completely destroyed and perhaps no trace of any of this. But on Mars that might not be the case. So the disarray you see may be just the time factor. And of course some of it could have been the result of that initial cataclysm. Moons blowing up in your face isn't the latest thing and it could do some damage.
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena, Pronouns: he/him
What's the scale on that picture? How big are the formations?
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena, Pronouns: he/him
OK. Thanks.
We have a sense of the future as something of extreme technological power approaching a form of magic. A little bit like Samantha on bewitched. I don't think thats how it would be at all. I think normal capitalist economics will prevail.
Under economics the technology is imbedded in capital goods update. The extent of the capital accumulation is limited by the extent of global trade. So if you get some refugees coming out of that situation with a single high-tech space-ship.... well there are special problems to developing a functioning economy just to survive at all. I wouldn't see the people who made up the hypothetical colony as being high tech gods. Rather I see them having to deal with enourmous problems in an attempt merely to survive and not lose the last of their productive know-how and capital goods.
If thinking about the way they would have to survive leads to some obvious conclusions that correspond to what we seem to be seeing up there well then thats something.
Some folks often talk like these characters would build a big face and a pyramid just as a sign to earthlings many distant years into the future. I reckon that would be ridiculous. I see no future or past of high-tech life without double-entry accounting and the profit motive. And no characters are going to set up an outpost on a cold lonesome moon and build big pyramids and things just to impress some unborn earthlings.
So the best way to look at this alternate paradigm is to try and imagine how we would handle matters if we had to set up shop on the Moon. What energy would we use. How would we survive. How would we make money. This sort of thing.
Under economics the technology is imbedded in capital goods update. The extent of the capital accumulation is limited by the extent of global trade. So if you get some refugees coming out of that situation with a single high-tech space-ship.... well there are special problems to developing a functioning economy just to survive at all. I wouldn't see the people who made up the hypothetical colony as being high tech gods. Rather I see them having to deal with enourmous problems in an attempt merely to survive and not lose the last of their productive know-how and capital goods.
If thinking about the way they would have to survive leads to some obvious conclusions that correspond to what we seem to be seeing up there well then thats something.
Some folks often talk like these characters would build a big face and a pyramid just as a sign to earthlings many distant years into the future. I reckon that would be ridiculous. I see no future or past of high-tech life without double-entry accounting and the profit motive. And no characters are going to set up an outpost on a cold lonesome moon and build big pyramids and things just to impress some unborn earthlings.
So the best way to look at this alternate paradigm is to try and imagine how we would handle matters if we had to set up shop on the Moon. What energy would we use. How would we survive. How would we make money. This sort of thing.
Last edited:
Frankenstyle
Scholar
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 97
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
They look concave here: http://www.marsunearthed.com/Anaglyphs/3D157/3D157.htm
