• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pentagon Fly-Over Caught On Radar

BCR

Master Poster
BCR
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
2,278
The FAA did not provide raw data or software, so I not only had to extract the data from the output files, but also write software to view it with. I created a gif using that software using the DCA ASR data. The blue "square" is the Navy Annex and the "pentagon" is the Pentagon. I did not spend a lot of time on the code that draws these two references as is obvious.

Beacon returns are yellow, primary returns are red. Look real close and see if you see the CIT fly-over!

dca_impact.gif


Do you see it? Nor did I.
 
But that's because the primary radar returnes are faked! :p

I didn't realize that smoke showed up on radar before.
 
why are there 6 red blips in the Pentagon?

oh my god.....6 planes crashed into the Pentagon??

we need a new investigation to look into this!!!!!!!!!
 
Maybe the NWO used a captured Romulan 757 and turned on the cloaking device right at the moment it reached the Pentagon!
 
I'm not sure what I'm looking at here...how do I know which red blip is the plane?
 
1337m4n said:
I'm not sure what I'm looking at here...how do I know which red blip is the plane?
Click to expand...


Watch the time stamps at the top of the gif. From 13:37:28 through 13:37:51, you can see the red blip(s) representing the plane come from the lower left corner up to the Pentagon. It leaves a bit of a trail, and is the only blip trail demonstrating any kind of consistent speed and direction.

ETA: I assume North is "up" in this GIF.
 
Last edited:
I suppose I gotta give some credit to the mainstream truthers. At least they're smart enough to know how stupid the flyover theory is.
 
I was told after I obtained the 84 RADES data and noted that the two final radar points for AAL77 did not fit with an aircraft, that fireballs and smoke columns do not give a radar signature. Never in the history of radar had such a thing happened (source: P4T experts). Perhaps this gif will explain why I listen to what "experts" have to say, but I have to let the data speak for itself.

If those post-impact returns are not the fireball and smoke column, then someone needs to offer a better hypothesis to consider. Perhaps they are the escape pods being used by the NWO folks?
 
911files said:
I was told after I obtained the 84 RADES data and noted that the two final radar points for AAL77 did not fit with an aircraft, that fireballs and smoke columns do not give a radar signature. Never in the history of radar had such a thing happened (source: P4T experts). Perhaps this gif will explain why I listen to what "experts" have to say, but I have to let the data speak for itself.

If those post-impact returns are not the fireball and smoke column, then someone needs to offer a better hypothesis to consider. Perhaps they are the escape pods being used by the NWO folks?
Click to expand...
Maybe it's the space beam dustifying the Pentagon!
 
Radar can be used to detect clouds (look at all the hits for radar cloud detection [google link]), so it's theoretically possible. Not an expert, of course, so I don't know if this specific radar could pick up the fireball/cloud, but I don't see it as impossible. I'd think the fireball, in particular, was denser (higher signal return) than ordinary clouds, as well.
 
Great work 911files!! You can even see where AA77 goes "under the radar" so to speak. Of course, this won't give CIT a pause, in fact it's just further evidence that anything the gubmint releases is fakedy fake!!


ETA: whats the yellow return starting at 09:39, just to to the south of where 77 started? The C-130?
 
Last edited:
Absolutely, explosions and such WILL show up on radar. Light smoke won't show up, but the smoke from that impact would definitely show up on radar.

Heck, what do you think weather radar shows. Precip shows up better, but you can see heavy clouds too, similar to what we saw after the explosion at the Pentagon.

Their opinion makes one wonder just how many of those "experts" at pffft have ever used weather radar.
 
I've tracked a lot of clouds on radar in my day ...

"Why didn't tell me about that contact?"

"what contact sir?"

Stabbing a finger at my screen, "That one!"

"That's a cloud sir."

"How do you know it's a cloud?"

"The leading edge has a variable shape and it has the same course and speed as constant wind."

"..."

"Track it anyway and give me updates. There could be a ship under it."
 
Jonnyclueless said:
I remember CIT making a lot of claims about the position of the C-130 saying how he couldn't possibly be in the area or something like that. I wonder how this plays with their data on that.
Click to expand...

It plays just as all of the other FACTUAL data does. It's all FAKE, the data has been manipulated, or the people are "in on it".

For heavens sake, don't you know the RADES data has been manipulated as has the Tribby Video, the Looney Photographs, the ATC transcripts, the ADW Radar, the DCA Radar, and the BMI Radar. The statements from those currently flying out of ADW that the Camp Springs Departure procedure obviously comes from "suspects", so they can't be believed. Why would this one little tidbit make any difference to a delusion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom