Pentagon Fly-Over Caught On Radar

Was that the DC-130 in that video?
Yes, the same guy has a close-up of it here:


Note it is exactly where the RADES data said it was, more proof (as if any was needed) that CIT is clueless and very, very wrong.
 
Yes, the same guy has a close-up of it here:


Note it is exactly where the RADES data said it was, more proof (as if any was needed) that CIT is clueless and very, very wrong.

Hmm...... That plane did exactly what Roberts said the "second plane" did. That's probably what he was talking about during his "interview" with Marquis. Of course, Marquis was trying to get him to say something, so he could package it and sell in his next "smoking gun release" and failed epically, as usual.

Roberts_Flight_Path.jpg
 
Last edited:
911files, do you know the wavelength of the primary radar signal?
Dave

No I don't. The FAA has a website with tons of documentation on the ASR-9 system. Perhaps you can find it there.

I assume that RADES is a primary radar and not a weather/doppler radar?

That all said, the plume from the explosion would contain not only shredded aircraft bits but also drywall and concrete dust, wood, glass, roofing etc., all of which is certainly dense enough to reflect a radar pulse.

Yes, the drift of the plume matches the slight wind that morning.
ETA: I see Beachnut already covered the wind.

The 84 RADES ARSR-3 is not weather/Doppler radar as far as I know, but the DCA ASR-9 has that capability.

Here is a gif I made from the Doubletree video. At the beginning of the gif, a small piece of debris falls on the lot. At 9:37:07, a larger debris piece is seen falling onto the lot. It may take a few minutes for the gif to load since it is around 8 megs. For reference, impact is at 9:34:10, so this is around 3 minutes post-impact.

dt_debris.gif
 
Wow. Thanks for the great work John. Are any of these gifs posted at aal77.com?
 
Strangely quiet in here now.

I suppose they could always say 9-11files manipulated the radar graphic under contract from the NWO. Say, what's the baseline "official" data manipulation rate nowadays? Back when I was spreading NeoCon PNAC propaganda, it was 3.99 for the first 512k, and 1/100000000 of a cent for each KB thereafter.
 

Back
Top Bottom