Mr_Mix
Scholar
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 95
We could not do that in current cities because they were made a long time ago and retrofitting would not be feasible. So in new cities built with this kind of thing in mind you would have a much more efficient sewer system for instance. Same goes for transportation and everything else.You seem to be assuming big innovations that will allow goods & services to be provided with much less labor input - for instance, automation, sewers that don't need maintenance, &c.
However, in the real world, labor costs money so there are already very strong incentives to develop these things. People and organizations have spent a huge amount of time and effort trying to reduce the labor inputs necessary to get any given output. Why do you assume that you can magically achieve much more? Perhaps, if researchers only do 15% of the work they do now, we'll get self-maintaining sewers and massive automation overnight?
Technicians and scientists would work on relevant things and money would no longer prevent technological progress. They would work without pay because their wellbeing is taken care of by society already not by the "sweat of their brow". They are free and unfettered to move forward with relevant tech and ideas.