Corroboration: Do you understand the term TexasJack?
Turbofan said:
Sure, attack the messenger and totally forget the fact the Lloyd's story
no longer holds water (as if it ever did...).
Some of you are real 'amazing' researchers.
I'm still curious to know if any of your "netgineers" can explain how the
light pole can suspend itself in mid air over the hood of the cab.
TexasJack said:
Corroboration, learn it. But I won't hold my breath, no truther has yet to able to understand it.
Corroboration - noun
1. confirmation that some fact or statement is true through the use of documentary evidence
2. to strengthen
3. The act of corroborating, strengthening, or confirming; addition of strength; confirmation; as, the corroboration of an argument, or of information.
You surely realize TexasJack that the photos of record, the VDOT dimensions, the interviews of Lloyde England, the examination of the taxicab, simple logic, are all useful towards the
corroboration of whatever pertains to the truth, don't you?
According to
corroboration by VDOT, the lamp head is 40 feet above ground level. By simple observation, the main light pole, tapered from 10 inches diameter at the base to 6 inches diameter at the top, and extruded from 1/8 inch thickness aluminum, and which weighs 247 pounds, is about 37 feet long and is straight. It seems about a four foot section lying beyond the taxi, was broken off the #1 light pole by an unknown force, at the lower truss arm connection. The remaining main pole length, which appears to be mechanically bent, would be about 33 feet in length.
Through
corroboration from Lloyde England and the official script, this 33 feet is the length of pole which has been alleged to have been hurled in some miraculous unscientific method by an alleged 757 aircraft wing, flying east at 535 mph, to the north in the wrong direction, in some other miraculous unscientific fashion past the fuselage of this alleged aircraft, into the windshield of a taxicab allegedly driving south on Hwy 27 at 40 mph. Why this alleged light pole hurled into this taxicab like a javelin, did not destroy the taxi and kill the only occupant remains a mystery.
This is
corroborated by the alleged driver of the taxicab, Lloyde England in live interviews and other previous media testimony, who claims he did not see where the pole came from, and also claims that he brought the taxi to a 40 foot skidding stop sideways in the road, with this 33 foot pole through the windshield, between the front seats, smaller diameter end stuck in the leather back seat, and the larger diameter base end sticking out over the hood in mid-air.
As
corroborated by simple measurement of the taxi, observation of the hole in the center of the windshield, and the taxi interior, and common sense, about 6 feet of the pole was inside the taxi interior, between the front seats, and nestled in the back seat, with the bent portion of the pole about at the windshield. About 5 feet of the pole was poised in mid-air above the hood, with the remaining 22 feet of the heavier base end of the pole sticking out past the bumper in mid-air. How less than 15% of the pole's mass could support more than 85% of the pole's mass suspended in mid-air through this wild gyration remains a mystery.
As
corroborated by the photos of the taxi taken on 9-11-2001, the highly waxed hood of the taxi is undamaged by this pole, even through the alleged sideways skidding stop from 40 mph. Furthermore, the 33 foot long pole was allegedly removed from the windshield at the request of the driver, by a silent mysterious stranger and Lloyde himself, without damaging the hood in any way, even though the pole allegedly rolled in the hands of Lloyde, allegedly knocking him down with the pole on top of him.
As
corroborated by a multitude of photos taken on the morning of 9-11-2001, there is not one photo of the alleged pole through the windshield, nor a photo of two persons removing the pole from the windshield. Also quite curious, is the evident fact that the pole hanging in midair past the bumper, would be much longer than the distance across the highway exit lane to the guard rail. Why the end of the pole did not hit the guard rail and slam the pole into the driver also remains a mystery.
As also
corroborated by a multitude of photos taken on the morning of 9-11-2001, there is no sign of bandages or bandaids on the face of Lloyde England, which might have covered cuts and injuries from the alleged shattering of glass in his face. Furthermore as
corroborated by the same photos, the elderly Lloyde England was kept out in the open by the apparent
Federal agents guarding the taxicab, standing near the rear bumper of his taxi for hour after hour of photo ops, obviously in no need of treatment or bandaging of cuts or injuries.
Oddly, as
corroborated by a multitude of witnesses from Arlington National Cemetery and the Cito gas station, and others, the actual aircraft flew Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo, and could not possibly have knocked down this light pole nor the other 4 light poles nearby. And recently on 9-12-2008, this flight path Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo was
corroborated by the FAA federal agency.
Isn't that interesting?
