• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Why WTC7 should not have collapsed

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's so fun watching you miserable sheep flail about helplessly.

In no way were you even close to addressing the fully valid and logical point i made. And don't expect me to browse your lame forum for what has "already been answered". If this thread is a waste of your time, then you can just stay off it.

EPIC FAIL.
 
mchapman said:
How could a collapse that was predicted be so hard to explain?
Click to expand...

Why dont you get off the internet and ask the FDNY, NYPD, OEM, DDC, and other NYC officials who predicted its inevitable collapse?

I guess the point of asking these questions on the JREF forum, and not to the folks who could actually answer them, obviously keeps you from actually getting an answer, and then you can claim the NWO is withholding the truth. Right? That is the whole point isn't it?

To not actually get a real answer.
 
mchapman said:
How could a collapse that was predicted be so hard to explain?
Click to expand...

Because physics and mathematical equations detailing what happened are far too boring to put into YouTube mash-ups with sooper scary hip-hop beats in the background.

I know it's hard to focus on things like physical evidence and expert testimony that doesn't support a wild, baseless conspiracy theory, but you'll probably have to get used to that, as the Troof cult is dead and consists of a few hangers-on that can't seem to find anything to support their claims.
 
Last edited:
papasmurf said:
You miss the point Texasjack blah blah, truther nonsense, blah blah
Click to expand...

I miss the point, LOL. You posted what you thought was a smoking gun from the CTUBH, saying and I quote:

"More proof that the professional community thinks that NIST is the biggest f'ing joke ever to happen to engineering analysis."

When in reality they think you are the joke and NIST is a distinguished group of scientists. The irony of the truth movement at its finest.
 
mchapman said:
If the collapse was predicted before hand and described as inevitable then explaining why it collapsed should be easy.
Click to expand...

The collapse was determined to be inevitable after the collapse, not before. Those who determined it to be inevitable did so after much investigation (not involving YouTube and Google).

As far as your classification of "prediction"; why would the authorities not presume the building would collapse they had immediate precedent? Like maybe two other buildings having collapsed earlier. If you'd seen two buildings collapse only hours earlier, you wouldn't warn others that building 7 also might collapse?
 
papasmurf said:
It's so fun watching you miserable sheep flail about helplessly.

In no way were you even close to addressing the fully valid and logical point i made. And don't expect me to browse your lame forum for what has "already been answered". If this thread is a waste of your time, then you can just stay off it.

EPIC FAIL.
Click to expand...

Also this:
The Council would like to make it clear that it sees no credibility whatsoever in the 911 ‘truth movement’ and we believe, with the vast majority of tall building professionals, that all the failures at the WTC (WTC 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7) were a direct or indirect result of the planes that were flown into the two towers.
Click to expand...
 
parky76 said:
Why dont you get off the internet and ask the FDNY, NYPD, OEM, DDC, and other NYC officials who predicted its inevitable collapse?
Click to expand...

I doubt mchapman would trust any of those sources. We already know he thinks the FDNY was in on it.
 
mchapman said:
No. A debunker posted a video here of a firefighter saying "Its definitely coming down, theres no way to stop it". How did he know this? If he knows it was definitely coming down then surely he could give NIST a head start on the mechanism.
Click to expand...

Because he had precedent. Two other buildings failed. WTC 7 had been burning unchecked all day. Debris was falling from the building.

In other words, like you say, it was a prediction base on precedent. You've never made a "definitive" statement that was actually a "prediction" based on precedent? Like saying the USC Trojans are definitely going to kill the Washington St. Cougars, before the game starts. Well, did everyone who said that know USC was going to win 69-0. Was the game fixed?

Again, a truther arguing nuance of speech and having prescience to know what other people mean when they speak.
 
Last edited:
johnny karate said:
Have you asked Charlie Sheen? I thought he was your go-to guy for technical questions regarding structural engineering.
Click to expand...

No ive learned my lesson, for all the technical stuff now im going to rely on a tour guide.

Any chance of you answering a question without mentioning your obvious idol charlie sheen.
 
papasmurf said:
It's so fun watching you miserable sheep flail about helplessly.

In no way were you even close to addressing the fully valid and logical point i made. And don't expect me to browse your lame forum for what has "already been answered". If this thread is a waste of your time, then you can just stay off it.

EPIC FAIL.
Click to expand...
Is it just me or do truthers think that by posting stuff like the above that all of sudden people will just agree with them?
 
Mince said:
A tour guide is on the board at NIST and participated in the investigation?
Click to expand...

No but the tour guide is the only one here who has read it. The rest of you just rely on him because you have done zero research of your own.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom