• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Why WTC7 should not have collapsed

Status
Not open for further replies.
mchapman said:
No but the tour guide is the only one here who has read it.
Click to expand...

That is a lie, and one you must to know to be lie. We have engineers (real ones, not the frauds that your movement comes up with) who have read the study (RMackay and Newton's Bit come to mind right away). In fact I don't think the 'Tour Guide' read the NIST report, preferring to rely on experts in the field to assess it.
 
Mince said:
Please provide a cite for your assertion that no one but a tour guide has read the NIST report.
Click to expand...

Id be happy to, when you explain why you didnt make the grade school crack when Parky76 said exactly what I said.
 
Good Lt said:
And that, children, is why nobody takes you seriously.

Any rational, sane human being would know that obviously no serious investigation is done simply by watching YouTube videos for an hour and issuing a 10,000+ page document speculating on what happened while ignoring physical evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...
Indeed. Imagine if NTSB investigations into aircraft crashes were done the same way. "Well, there's a video of the vertical stabilizer falling off, and the jet then crashed, so the cause of the crash is the vertical stabilizer falling off. Why did the vertical stabilizer fall off? What factors may have contributed to its failure? We don't need to know any of that. Case closed."

mchapman said:
How could a collapse that was predicted be so hard to explain?
Click to expand...
If you see a vertical stabilizer fall off an aircraft, or an jetliner lose all hydraulic power, predicting that the aircraft will likely soon crash is not difficult nor surprising. But in order to determine what exactly caused that stabilizer failure or loss of hydraulics, one must perform a thorough investigation. One must look at all the factors that contributed to those particular failures.

Might part of the reason be poor maintenance? Might part of the reason be a heretofore undiscovered design flaw in the aircraft? Might the crew have inadvertantly done something to make the situation worse? Could they have reacted better? Did their training cover enough areas? Did weather conditions play any role in initiating or exacerbating the event? What can be learned from the accident that might make future aircraft design and operation safer so as to avoid such accidents in the future? The list goes on and on.
 
mchapman said:
Id be happy to, when you explain why you didnt make the grade school crack when Parky76 said exactly what I said.
Click to expand...

Uh, because I missed it. Jesus Christ, this is grade school. Did you hear Bobby and Kelly broke up? My god. Quit crying and provide a cite to support your assertion that only one person on this website has read the NIST report.

Or are you unable to? Are you merely arguing with the familiar truther presupposition?
 
Another thread that is in the end nowt but bickering. Thread closed.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom