Thanks for the clarification, Skeptic!
Could you also clarify what
this Hebrew wiki page is about?
The short version is:
1). Doron wants to use wikipedia's "discussion" pages as a free-for-all discussion forum.
2). Others tell him that while there's more leeway allowed in wikipedia's discussion forums than in the entries themselves, it isn't really the place for a free-for-all discussion or "tentative results" (their polite term for "whatever the heck you're babbling about") but rather for established results.
3). Doron demands that they show him exactly
where it says that he
cannot use wikipedia's discussion forums in such a manner.
4). He then posts his usual gibberish, and demands everybody show exactly
what is wrong with it.
5). Others complain that, in two days, he made about 50 edits of two entries ("The Lair's Paradox" and "Godel", I believe) "most of them trivial" and ask him to PLEASE use the "preview" button instead of posting and then changing the posts later, since "that makes our job harder".
6). Then the discussion, quite suddenly, veer away from mathematics to theology: they begin to discuss how logical the hypothesis that God exists is. A few gems:
a). The title of the "does God exist?" thread is actually "On the big Bang, Atheism, and Onions."
b). Doron and another poster spend most of the time discussing the onions: do they have a core, or an infinite number of layers? Onions are used as a metaphor for two ways to look at reality, one with a first cause (theism's God as a cause), the other as better and better natural explanations without a first cause (atheism).
c). Doron claims the onions have both a core and an infinite number of layers, because he had discovered classical two-valued logic is wrong.
d). He writes long-winded gibberish about theology as well as about mathematics (Cranks are very prolific in their gibberish). Example paragraph (they all are of the same kind):
"When there's a dichotomy between the cooperation field and the expression field, consciousness, which is locked under the impressions of the expression field, understands the cooperation field (the unity aspect of consciousness) as the creator of the expression field (the multiplicity aspect of the consciousness)."
It doesn't make any sense in Hebrew, either. Crank works have one advantage: they don't really lose anything in translation.
e). Doron asks another poster angrily during that discussion: "are you going to listen to facts, or are you just going to use the form to spew your own theories?"
