• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Obama used terrorist Ayers as a ghostwriter

No, he makes a lousy case as has been discussed already in about three threads here. And seriously 'American Thinker' needs to change its name. Perhaps 'United Persistant Vegetative Stater'.
 
Even if his argument were excellent (and it's just the opposite), a claim like that needs evidence. He provides none.

Why do all the CT folks think Obama, a former editor, can't write?
 
Tricky said:
Even if his argument were excellent (and it's just the opposite), a claim like that needs evidence. He provides none.

Why do all the CT folks think Obama, a former editor, can't write?
Click to expand...

If you read the article, Obama was never editor of the Law Review only President--a position won as a popularity contest. Obama has yet to prove he has written anything of substance.
 
MaGZ said:
If you read the article, Obama was never editor of the Law Review only President--a position won as a popularity contest. Obama has yet to prove he has written anything of substance.
Click to expand...

Oopsie. Your really need to stop getting all your info from right-wing rags.

Wikipedia said:
At the end of his first year, he was selected, based on his grades and a writing competition, as an editor of the Harvard Law Review. In February 1990, in his second year, he was elected president of the Law Review,
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
MaGZ said:
If you read the article, Obama was never editor of the Law Review only President--a position won as a popularity contest. Obama has yet to prove he has written anything of substance.
Click to expand...

No, that is what you get if you read and believe the article. Many other sources state that yes he was elected President of the HLR. He was also one of 80 - 90 students out of about 1000 to be Selected as an EDITOR of the HLR.
 
MaGZ said:
I suggested in previous threads Obama never wrote his books, only contributed the events of his life. Now my prediction is confirmed in this analysis.
Click to expand...

Style is not evidence. People with at all similar education, community ties, interests and life experiences will write somewhatin the same style.

The creep you cite has no physical evidence. He is farting in the wind, as is anyone who takes him seriously.
 
Sure he makes an excellent argument...for values of "Excellent argument" that equal "Argument from incredulity backed by pure speculation"
 
Cleon said:
Uh, I'm guessing you're unfamiliar with MaGZ. It's not a "claim" so much as "fairly freaking obvious."
Click to expand...
Indeed, MaGZ's views are quite known around here.

Also, DrBaltar, I realize you have trouble with reading comprehension (along with running away from threads, failing to read sources and unable to provide evidence for claims, etc. etc.) but did you notice the question mark at the end of my words? (like that one). Do you know what that means? (there it is again).
 
Can someone prove Jack's theory is flawed and without substance? I thought this guiy devoted lots of research into the subject. Have you guys? What are YOUR credentials to discredit this PH.D.? Are you discrediting him because you want Obama elected, no matter what?

Can you prove to me that the Grand Canyon is a result of errosion? How can YOU prove it, unless you accept second hand proof? Buy what researcxhers say, riight? What if I tell you God did it and the researchers are wrong? I suppose you will then say many researchers agree on that fact.

Okay, what if I tell you that only Jack has really seriously looked into this? Now where do we go from here? Wouldn't it be a logical first step rather than to belittle those hypothesizing, to then have others first take a look into this, before name calling?
 
Iamme said:
Can someone prove Jack's theory is flawed and without substance? I thought this guiy devoted lots of research into the subject. Have you guys? What are YOUR credentials to discredit this PH.D.? Are you discrediting him because you want Obama elected, no matter what?

Can you prove to me that the Grand Canyon is a result of errosion? How can YOU prove it, unless you accept second hand proof? Buy what researcxhers say, riight? What if I tell you God did it and the researchers are wrong? I suppose you will then say many researchers agree on that fact.

Okay, what if I tell you that only Jack has really seriously looked into this? Now where do we go from here? Wouldn't it be a logical first step rather than to belittle those hypothesizing, to then have others first take a look into this, before name calling?
Click to expand...


It is up to Jack to prove his theory is correct, not up to anyone else to disprove it.

As for the rest....:rolleyes:
 
Iamme said:
Can someone prove Jack's theory is flawed and without substance?
Click to expand...

No, it's up to him to substantiate his claims.

I thought this guiy devoted lots of research into the subject. Have you guys? What are YOUR credentials to discredit this PH.D.?
Click to expand...

How is this not argument from authority?

Are you discrediting him because you want Obama elected, no matter what?
Click to expand...

More likely, you're believing him because you don't want Obama elected.

Can you prove to me that the Grand Canyon is a result of errosion? How can YOU prove it, unless you accept second hand proof? Buy what researcxhers say, riight? What if I tell you God did it and the researchers are wrong? I suppose you will then say many researchers agree on that fact.

Okay, what if I tell you that only Jack has really seriously looked into this? Now where do we go from here? Wouldn't it be a logical first step rather than to belittle those hypothesizing, to then have others first take a look into this, before name calling?
Click to expand...

None of this makes the least bit of sense.
 
Where is the scandal here? Is Dreams From My Father promoting terrorist ideas, violence or how to build bombs?

No = Non issue.
 
Cleon said:
No, it's up to him to substantiate his claims.



How is this not argument from authority?



More likely, you're believing him because you don't want Obama elected.



None of this makes the least bit of sense.
Click to expand...

You just don't get it. The guy worked really hard on it and stuff, it MUST be true.
 
Oliver said:
Where is the scandal here? Is Dreams From My Father promoting terrorist ideas, violence or how to build bombs?

No = Non issue.
Click to expand...

The scandal is Obama presents the world he wrote his book without any help. Obama is a fraud.
 
MaGZ said:
The scandal is Obama presents the world he wrote his book without any help. Obama is a fraud.
Click to expand...


You mean like presenting political speeches like being their own? :D
It's a non issue unless you say that almost every politician in the world
is a fraud. Is that what you're saying?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom