I asked you several times.
Do you have evidence to discuss or debate with me, you stated no.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?
- Thread starter Crazytimes
- Start date
I asked you several times.
Do you have evidence to discuss or debate with me, you stated no.
And i merely wanted to see your evidence, any evidence you have.
He has no evidence to support your conclusion. He is in no way responsible for proving your conclusion for you. That is your responsibility as a petitioner under US law - the burden of proof lies with the accuser.
You were stating that 50%+ of those affected by 9/11 desire a new investigation. Proving this assertion is your responsibility if you desire it considered meaningful.
~ Matt
Last edited:
Mince
Master Poster
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 2,009
He's intentionally playing stupid to frustrate members. It's a subtle form of trollery. Why would someone ask for evidence if you already had the evidence. Yeah, I'm sure this guy is an analyst for an intelligence agency.
ULTIMA1, I no longer want to see your "evidence" that most family members, experts and first responders want a new investigation. I'm sure it's a false claim.
Last edited:
Mince
Master Poster
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 2,009
Regarding your claim that most family members, experts and first responders want a new investigation, I have none. How does this preclude you from posting your proof? If I had the evidence, I wouldn't ask for it. I'd already know.
My claim: ULTIMA1 slept with Alex Jones last tuesday. I'm not going to post my proof until ULTIMA1 demonstrates he has evidence on the matter.
I merely wanted to see your evidence, any evidence you have.[/QUOTE]
Just like i am sure anything you post is a false claim since you stated you do not have any evidnece.
Mince
Master Poster
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 2,009
Your claim is false.
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
So ULTIMA1,
When are you going to send all of your evidence to
Capt. Prescott L. Prince
5511 Staples Mill Road
Richmond, VA 23228
Phone: (804) 261-6101
and get at least one man off of nearly 3,000 murder charges?
When are you going to send all of your evidence to
Capt. Prescott L. Prince
5511 Staples Mill Road
Richmond, VA 23228
Phone: (804) 261-6101
and get at least one man off of nearly 3,000 murder charges?
I merely wanted to see your evidence, any evidence you have
When you have all your evidence together to support the official story side.
Let me know when you are ready.
Proving your own assertion, somewhat-less-than-ultima, is your own responsibility if you desire it to be considered meaningful in any discussion whatsoever.
I will no longer consider your babble worthy of a reply until you back up the assertion you have made (to remind you of it, "50%+ of those affected by 9/11 desire a new investigation"). I highly suggest every other person in this thread adopt the same policy.
~ Matt
I will no longer consider your babble worthy of a reply until you back up the assertion you have made (to remind you of it, "50%+ of those affected by 9/11 desire a new investigation"). I highly suggest every other person in this thread adopt the same policy.
~ Matt
Well i know any claim you make will be false when you will not even post any evidence when asked.
Mince
Master Poster
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 2,009
Yes, but that does not change the fact that your claim is false.
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
I'm not planning to try the case, the US Government will put it's case forward at the trial. You are claiming to have evidence that would prove that case incorrect, why are you not willing to send it to the defence's lawyer? You claim that your evidence will stand up in court, so why are you unwilling to send it to be tried before a court of law? Surely the lives of the men charged with the nearly 3000 murders on 9/11 are more important than faceless arguing on the internet. Why aren't you packing up your evidence and making sure the defence has it?
Gee, it really is fun and easy to prove people wrong who do not do researsh and have no evdence.
1 video of first responders wanting new investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC3YlKERdg8
Mince
Master Poster
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 2,009
It's not worth it. He's beaten me with stupidity. I don't mind admitting it.
No i am going to take you to court and ask you to prove your side. Since you seem to want to prove things so bad.
Mince
Master Poster
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 2,009
One wrong answer.
You claimed that most first responders want a new investigation. So, if your claim is correct and this video is your proof, there must not have been very many first responders on 9/11 if most of them are represented in this video.. Looks like you need to continue the Google searches and YouTube vids. Cuz that's how real researchers do their research.
Last edited:
Zipster
Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
- Messages
- 178
Ok...do the responders shown in the video constitute more than 50% of all the people who were personally touched by 9/11?
My vote is that they do not constitute 50%.
See i knew you would not accept any evidence, just like a true beleiver.
Will not accept anything that goes against whast they have been told.
Thanks for proving my point about believers.