• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Absolute proof of video fakery

1337m4n said:
It's the same video. The quality isn't any better.

Demonstrate that you understand your stuff: get a high-quality video and point out the anomalies using screencaps.
Click to expand...

No, the quality is far better on live video.
 
mchapman said:
No, the quality is far better on live video.
Click to expand...

Fail..yet again. You really suck at this, man. You need to compress.

You failed at other threads...and now fail at this one. What's next?

ETA: what pardalis said.
 
mchapman said:
And how does that black gash propagate 15 seconds later?
Click to expand...
It's not a gash, it's the result of multiple compressions of the video to such an extent all the detail is lost.

Ever wonder why no-planers always use the crappiest videos they can find to prove their point?

Oh yeah, and thousands of people saw the planes hit... :rolleyes:
 
WildCat said:
It's not a gash, it's the result of multiple compressions of the video to such an extent all the detail is lost.

Ever wonder why no-planers always use the crappiest videos they can find to prove their point?

Oh yeah, and thousands of people saw the planes hit... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Multiple compressions? The gash is there on every version of naudet I have seen.
 
A little cursory research reveals that aside from the firefighters actually shown in the footage, the film to which it was a part was co-directed by a firefighter, and had the full participation of Engine 7, Ladder 1 of the FDNY.

Curiously, none of them have come forward to support the allegations that the footage was altered.

Now that mchapman is on record proclaiming fakery of a 9/11 video made by and with the cooperation of the FDNY, we can add him to the long and not so distinguished list of Truthers who slander the FDNY in their hilariously determined quest to deny reality.

Way to go, champ.
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
It's not a gash, it's the result of multiple compressions of the video to such an extent all the detail is lost.

Ever wonder why no-planers always use the crappiest videos they can find to prove their point?

Oh yeah, and thousands of people saw the planes hit... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

What's funny is seeing the lowest level of truther come here with the bravado of a truther who brings crap he/she thinks has never been presented before. It's funny to see them bang thier heads against a wall of logic and still never realize they've been discovered even before they arrived. It's so entertaining to watch. Yes, McCheese...we've seen your kind before. You're nothing new.
 
I have just looked on the 9/11 DVD and the gash is there. It is no compression artifact.
 
OK, I have a confession to make now that the cat's out of the bag... the Eagles really did make that touchdown on 4th down against the Bears last night, but since I'm a Bears fan I had the video fakery department here at the NWO fake the video to make it appear the Eagles didn't score. We told Donavan McNabb et al that if they said anything we'd fire them and take their pensions away if they spoke out.

It's good to be the NWO Master Conspirator!
 
WildCat said:
OK, I have a confession to make now that the cat's out of the bag... the Eagles really did make that touchdown on 4th down against the Bears last night, but since I'm a Bears fan I had the video fakery department here at the NWO fake the video to make it appear the Eagles didn't score. We told Donavan McNabb et al that if they said anything we'd fire them and take their pensions away if they spoke out.

It's good to be the NWO Master Conspirator!
Click to expand...

Why did you claim the gash was a compression artifact when in fact it is on a DVD of 9/11?
 
It also depends on how the author of the video got his material. I saw a downloaded version of "Lambs for Lions" the other day from Netflix, and it had many artifacts, little missing pixels in the image during the thransfer, including a shot when Robert Redford suddenly has a spooky reptilian eyes for a few frames.

Image1-1.png

Image2.png

Image3.png

(these are not altered by me, they are screen captures from what I downloaded)

So if the author downloded his source material from something like Netflix, the same thing could have happened.

Now I'm not exactly sure what causes those weird digital mistakes, I'm not a video expert, and I'm not saying that's what happened either, but it's a reasonable explanation that doesn't involve duplicity and a cover-up. You need to vet out any rational explanation before you can jump to the conspiracy explanation.
 
Last edited:
mchapman said:
So you agree the video has been faked?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how you derived that from anything I've said.

You claim the video is fake.

The video was part of a film made by and with the cooperation of the FDNY.

How do reconcile that with your belief of the FDNY's level of complicity in the supposed 9/11 conspiracy?
 
Pardalis said:
It also depends on how the author of the video got his material. I saw a downloaded version of "Lambs for Lions" the other day from Netflix, and it had many artifacts, little missing pixels in the image during the thransfer, including a shot when Robert Redford suddenly has a spooky reptilian eyes for a few frames.
Click to expand...

Oh no... don't start talking reptilian... the guy is a no planer- jumping to "reptilian overlords" isn't that big of a leap for people of that level of ignorance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom