• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Absolute proof of video fakery

mchapman said:
Address the video or pipe down.
Click to expand...

I did address the video.

Clearly, the FDNY participated in it.

I'm asking you to reconcile that with what you think their participation may have been in the overall conspiracy you believe took place.

It's not a very difficult request, and I'd like to see if you've the stones to address the inconvenient implications of your claims, or if you're just another intellectually dishonest blowhard.
 
1337m4n said:
I can't wait for someone to use the same procedure to "prove" that the State of the Union address was actually delivered by a trained penguin.
Click to expand...


George Bush is trained, though...isn't he?
 
johnny karate said:
I did address the video.

Clearly, the FDNY participated in it.

I'm asking you to reconcile that with what you think their participation may have been in the overall conspiracy you believe took place.

It's not a very difficult request, and I'd like to see if you've the stones to address the inconvenient implications of your claims, or if you're just another intellectually dishonest blowhard.
Click to expand...

So you agree the video has been faked?
 
The video talks of secondary explosions, but you forget that the whole thing lasts in reality 1 second, so it's really the one same explosion which is propagating.

And about the gash being "painted in", it could be anything, a digital artifact of somekind.
 
Last edited:
mchapman said:
I asked my eyes and they came back affirmative.

Which experts do you ask when you are determining the color of the sky?

It is totally plain to see what is going on in the video.
Click to expand...

Your eyes don't count in anything, lil' buddy. We don't care. How about this...you tell us what's compelling, at what time during the video, and why...and then we'll take it into consideration. Detail your issue, what time during the video, why you think it's an issue and the reason you find it puzzling...and we'll take it under scrutiny. Nothing less makes you as empty as all the rest of you posts this evening.

Thanks.
 
mchapman said:
Which experts do you ask when you are determining the color of the sky?
Click to expand...

Interesting question.

Let us suppose you are colorblind, and have been that way for your entire life. As for determining the color of the sky, you would have to options:

1) Make a wild guess based on "intuition".

2) Consult someone who is NOT colorblind.


Now, which experts do you ask when you are determining what an "explosion" is "supposed to" look like?
 
What's really funny about that video is the way they compare a really low-res video with another low-res video and note the differences... how mind-boggling stupid do you have to be to fall for that crap?
 
Pardalis said:
The video talks of secondary explosions, but you forget that the whole thing lasts in reality 1 second, so it's really the one same explosion which is propagating.
Click to expand...

And how does that black gash propagate 15 seconds later?
 
The funny thing is, the horizontal "gash" (which of course is not a gash, but a row of windows blown out by the deflagration) is clearly visible in several of the places where the video is saying "look, no gash in this view!"

Given that the windows were recessed behind the perimeter columns and the aluminum facade, might a row of blown-out windows look different (e.g. much darker than the surrounding wall, versus only slightly darker than the surrounding wall) from different directions, depending on the whether or not angle of the view affords a direct line of sight to the plane of the windows? And/or whether or not the angle of the view relative to the angle of the light allows empty window frames to reflect light differently than the surrounding still-intact windows?

Or is Photoshop the only way something could ever look different when photographed from different angles? (Answer provided for those who believe everything they are told by YouTube video captions: no.)

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
mchapman said:
I asked my eyes and they came back affirmative.
Click to expand...

You know, your eyes are essentially nothing but gelatinous orbs or non-thinking biological tissue with absolutely no capacity for thought or interpretation...don't you? Sure, they see, and you might think they are ultra-powerful...but they really don't have the capacity for thought. They only record, it's your brain which "thinks". I use quotation marks because, in your case, the matter is dubious.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
At 2:29 he claims that the "primary explosion burns out" when it very clearly has not. He's an idiot.
Click to expand...


Also, his "secondary explosion" is the fire erupting from the impact hole, which would be very clear if he had continued that segment. Again, he's an idiot. A deceptive idiot.
 
Last edited:
fullflavormenthol said:
First, if special effects were used it would be even more easy to detect them. How about getting a high quality version of the sequence. Then take a still frame of the gash and analyze the pixels in a image editor. If it was "photoshopped" than it would have no variance in pixels. Even the best artists can't fake the randomness.
Click to expand...


You technical guys so confound my conspiracy. Damn you!
 
mchapman said:
Until I saw this video I thought video fakery was ridiculous

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM

but this video proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt. You can actually see 30 feet of the gash in the North Tower being pencilled in!
Click to expand...
Are you this gullible? Dumbest video yet. Great find, how dumb can the truth movement get?

Are you always wrong, or you are new to not getting anything right on 9/11? So far you are doing perfect, no evidence presented on all your posts.

Your stuff is refuted, don't try again unless you have some new stuff, it makes you look gullible and lacking knowledge.

The guy that did that video is terminally stupid. Great find, pure stupid on 9/11. You understand how stupid it was, or are you a truther, a terrorist apologist person?
 
Last edited:
mchapman, what's this?

Pentagon_engine_photo350.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom