• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?

bwinwright said:
Practically the entire "Official" 9/11 report was false. It has been thoroughly disproved.

Also, anyone who watches WTC Building Number 7 fall to the ground at free fall speed and NOT think it was intentionally demolished is absolutely delusional. Wow!

Man, you guys who believe these towers simply fell as the result of planes and fire are completely off the hook insane. You probably believe Osama bin Laden orchestrated it too.
Click to expand...

Your "free fall speed" comment confirms you don't know what you are talking about. Go on soaking in the truther lies and not actually doing some research. Let me guess, you still think "Pull" is an industry standard term for a controlled demo ?
 
bwinwright said:
Practically the entire "Official" 9/11 report was false. It has been thoroughly disproved.

Also, anyone who watches WTC Building Number 7 fall to the ground at free fall speed and NOT think it was intentionally demolished is absolutely delusional. Wow!

Man, you guys who believe these towers simply fell as the result of planes and fire are completely off the hook insane. You probably believe Osama bin Laden orchestrated it too.
Click to expand...
Anyone ever notice that insane people think it's actually everyone else that's insane?
 
bwinwright said:
Practically the entire "Official" 9/11 report was false. It has been thoroughly disproved.

Also, anyone who watches WTC Building Number 7 fall to the ground at free fall speed and NOT think it was intentionally demolished is absolutely delusional. Wow!

Man, you guys who believe these towers simply fell as the result of planes and fire are completely off the hook insane. You probably believe Osama bin Laden orchestrated it too.
Click to expand...

You tell em', bwinwright! Keep it up, little buddy!

<-----tussles bwin's hair and pats him on the head. :boggled:
 
I suppose that makes a lot of structural engineers and demolition experts absolutely delusional
 
bwinwright said:
Practically the entire "Official" 9/11 report was false. It has been thoroughly disproved.

Also, anyone who watches WTC Building Number 7 fall to the ground at free fall speed and NOT think it was intentionally demolished is absolutely delusional. Wow!

Man, you guys who believe these towers simply fell as the result of planes and fire are completely off the hook insane. You probably believe Osama bin Laden orchestrated it too.
Click to expand...
Does anyone else find it impossible to distinguish good sarcasm from actual twoofer beliefs?
:confused:
 
RedIbis said:
So you're saying that I have to have Column 79 to prove my theory?
Click to expand...

You ignored my post. Why? Here it is again:
Nice try, but not good enough. Now, please give us your reasoning as to WHY column 79 is your best piece of evidence. In your reasoning, please provide calculations, scientific evidence, and relevant sources. Leave all speculation at the door.
Click to expand...

Please try and give an answer this time.
 
MarekM said:
Does anyone else find it impossible to distinguish good sarcasm from actual twoofer beliefs?
:confused:
Click to expand...

I did have to wonder based on the last line if bwinwright was being sarcastic, but not remembering any other posts I from him/her I must admit that it's hard to tell is it's scarasm or real.
 
Quad4_72 said:
We are well aware that you have not found evidence. Thank you for stating the obvious though.
Click to expand...

No evidence, no facts, no theories (other than "it was an inside job") and they wonder why they aren't getting anywhere.
 
MikeW said:
Yes, that's my experience too. It's a standard response to any explanation of one of their "anomalies" or "contradictions" - "but you're ignoring The Big Picture". It's as though they accept that individual truther points are feeble, but if you just string enough of them together then somehow they now form a strong argument.
Click to expand...

A recent variation of this was when one Truther here stated that "Political LIteracy is more important to understanding 9/11 then Scientific Literacy".
In other words, "We Don't Need No Stinking Actual Proof!".
 
There is no "best" piece of evidence. For you must have at least two pieces of evidence for one to be best. The "truthers" have none. By evidence, I mean actual empirical evidence, not "evidence" derived from speculation based on ignorance of scientific principles and personal incredulity. Of course the collapse is going to look funny...to the uninformed. Of course the explanation isn't going to make sense...to the uneducated.
 
R.Mackey said:
That isn't even close to what I said, and to my knowledge, you don't even have a theory.

You were asked "what's your best piece of evidence." You answered with something that isn't yours, and that we do not have. Non sequitur. Very simple.
Click to expand...

So now I have to own it. Is that the semantics you're working with?
 
RedIbis said:
So now I have to own it. Is that the semantics you're working with?
Click to expand...

Can I just point out that- in your attempt to shift the burden of proof- you're trying to hold on to an argument from ignorance.

Lack of evidence is not evidence, Red. That's not "semantics", that's science. There's a big difference.
 
Totovader said:
Can I just point out that- in your attempt to shift the burden of proof- you're trying to hold on to an argument from ignorance.

Lack of evidence is not evidence, Red. That's not "semantics", that's science. There's a big difference.
Click to expand...

So if I don't have Column 79 to prove my theory, you don't think my theory holds much water?
 
RedIbis said:
So if I don't have Column 79 to prove my theory, you don't think my theory holds much water?
Click to expand...

That's not an answer to my question. You're just reiterating your fallacy- and that doesn't help your case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom