• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?

Crazytimes

Critical Thinker
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
348
I asked this question of a friend of mine who believes 9/11 was an inside job.

What in your mind is your ONE SINGLE BEST piece of evidence that proves 9/11 was an inside job ?

He had a hard time using just ONE SINGLE piece of evidence and in the end his evidence wasnt evidence at all. It was a question.

So truthers, please answer the question.

What in your mind is your ONE SINGLE BEST piece of evidence that proves 9/11 was an inside job ?

I am talking bring to court evidence. Not any of this "It looks like a controlled demo" crap.
 
i didnt find any evidence, just a few indications :)
 
We are well aware that you have not found evidence. Thank you for stating the obvious though.

silly me, should have learned by now to not post in the "twoofer bashing" topics.
my fault, sorry.
 
For "Ultra-Violence" troofas, the single piece of evidence is an interview between Aaron Russo and Alex Jones, about a Rockefeller guy.

For "Nightmare" troofas, all is secret. "They" must hide everything. A single doubt is their best evidence.
 
Who is the BEST out of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny?
 
WTC 7 Column 79

And what about that particular column?


To the topic at hand. Usually when you ask this question of truthers (although RedIbis answered more specifically) they'll grandstand on "it's not about one specific thing....it's the entirety of the situation" and then a lot of times they'll go off into a rant about the Iraq war, or something of that nature.


1337m4n said:
Who is the BEST out of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny?
Santa Claus.
 
WTC 7 Column 79

Nice try, but not good enough. Now, please give us your reasoning as to WHY column 79 is your best piece of evidence. In your reasoning, please provide calculations, scientific evidence, and relevant sources. Leave all speculation at the door.
 
Usually when you ask this question of truthers (although RedIbis answered more specifically) they'll grandstand on "it's not about one specific thing....it's the entirety of the situation"...
Yes, that's my experience too. It's a standard response to any explanation of one of their "anomalies" or "contradictions" - "but you're ignoring The Big Picture". It's as though they accept that individual truther points are feeble, but if you just string enough of them together then somehow they now form a strong argument.
 
WTC 7 Column 79
(I.e., "a key piece of structural steel that wasn't ever recovered.)

That's nuts. That isn't how science works.

That's like saying the best evidence I have for aliens is the UFO that I don't have.
 
It reminds me of a scene from 'The Simpsons'

Judge: Mr. Hutz w've been in here for four hours. Do you have any evidence at all?
Lionel Hutz: Well, Your Honor. We've plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence.
 
(I.e., "a key piece of structural steel that wasn't ever recovered.)

That's nuts. That isn't how science works.

That's like saying the best evidence I have for aliens is the UFO that I don't have.

So you're saying that I have to have Column 79 to prove my theory?
 
So you're saying that I have to have Column 79 to prove my theory?

No, just to say it is a piece of evidence.

That said, I would say most truthers would say the collapse of WTC7 is their strongest piece of evidence (which is not saying much).

of course, even calling the collapse of WTC7 a piece of evidence is not really valid...is it?

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
So you're saying that I have to have Column 79 to prove my theory?

That isn't even close to what I said, and to my knowledge, you don't even have a theory.

You were asked "what's your best piece of evidence." You answered with something that isn't yours, and that we do not have. Non sequitur. Very simple.
 
Practically the entire "Official" 9/11 report was false. It has been thoroughly disproved.

Also, anyone who watches WTC Building Number 7 fall to the ground at free fall speed and NOT think it was intentionally demolished is absolutely delusional. Wow!

Man, you guys who believe these towers simply fell as the result of planes and fire are completely off the hook insane. You probably believe Osama bin Laden orchestrated it too.
 
Also, anyone who watches WTC Building Number 7 fall to the ground at free fall speed and NOT think it was intentionally demolished is absolutely delusional. Wow!

No traces of bombs were found in the WTC7 debris, therefore your pathetic hypothesis is invalid.
 

Back
Top Bottom