LAL
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 19, 2005
- Messages
- 3,255
I don't understand the functionality of that sentiment or opinion. The film is widely regarded as a hoax because they weren't smart or capable enough to pull it off.
There was a moderator intervention while I was writing my reply and that was all I could think of for a substitute after I edited all that out. I don't think having respect for people who have actually done work in the field is "hero worship" or making "gods" out of them. Byrne examined the site and used a pole to gauge the figure's height. This is the figure Glickman used and it's close to foot length x 7 (the range would be 6 -7 foot lengths for the height). Dr. Krantz asked Roger about anatomical details he would have had to know and got a blank look.
Many people think it looks like a costume, and the surrounding testimony is highly suspect. That should count as - "they didn't pull it off".
And I (and many people who've analyzed the film) think it doesn't look like a costume and the testimony holds up, especially when compared to Bob Heironimus' ever-changing story. There was nothing to "pull off".
I prefer my "factoids" to groundless speculation, thanks.