Why does FAA/Norad animation show NoC flightpath?

[TheLoneBedouin]

How did no one notice them on the ground between sunrise and impact?

Why would you notice an odd lightpole missing if it was daytime, when they wouldn't be used?

Lloyd saw one crash onto his car.

Lie. Lloyd claims he saw the heavy part of the light pole javelin through his windsheild- a physically impossible feat.

How does one get fooled into thinking they saw it enter the building?

Priming from WTC attacks and subsequent media brainwashing.

He asked where it was, not where it wasn't.

Stupid question. That's what we're trying to find out.

Only if you can show that the occupants were not those discovered in the Pentagon. It would help if you could venture a theory as to where they are now.

"Occupants" were not discovered at the Pentagon. Body parts, on the other hand, were allegedly found, but the chain of custody is questionable.

What has that got to do with the question you were asked?

A loaded question doesn't deserve an answer.

 

[gumboot]

Why would you notice an odd lightpole missing if it was daytime, when they wouldn't be used?

Well the fact that it is lying across the middle of the road you're driving on might get your attention.

Lie. Lloyd claims he saw the heavy part of the light pole javelin through his windsheild- a physically impossible feat.

There is nothing remotely impossible about what Mr England described.

Priming from WTC attacks and subsequent media brainwashing.

Because everyone cruising along in rush hour traffic that morning had seen UA175 crash live on TV 30 minutes earlier...

"Occupants" were not discovered at the Pentagon. Body parts, on the other hand, were allegedly found, but the chain of custody is questionable.

The only people who question the chain of custody are moronic conspiracy theorists.

 

[Tweeter]

I would like an explanation from the nuts. If no plane hit the light poles, how did they rip out of the ground ? How did no one notice them being ripped out of the ground by anything other than a plane ? What about the hundreds of witnesses that saw the plane ? Liars ?

Again....try connecting the dots. Your theories make no sense.

Where is the plane ?
Where are the people on board ?

How crazy do you have to be to claim the government planted pieces of an airplane around the Pentagon ?

Hundre3ds of witnesses and plane parts all over the lawn yet the first report was "there has been an explosion at the pentagon". What you people need to realize is most of the evidence of a plane being there has just recently surfaced. It took atleast 3 or more years to do any debunking at all. Look at most of the debunker join dates
2007. Everything was classified up until 3 years ago.

 

[TJM]

I would like an explanation from the nuts. If no plane hit the light poles, how did they rip out of the ground ? How did no one notice them being ripped out of the ground by anything other than a plane ? What about the hundreds of witnesses that saw the plane ? Liars ?

Again....try connecting the dots. Your theories make no sense.

Where is the plane ?
Where are the people on board ?

How crazy do you have to be to claim the government planted pieces of an airplane around the Pentagon ?

This crazy. Any questions?

Hundre3ds of witnesses and plane parts all over the lawn yet the first report was "there has been an explosion at the pentagon". What you people need to realize is most of the evidence of a plane being there has just recently surfaced. It took atleast 3 or more years to do any debunking at all. Look at most of the debunker join dates
2007. Everything was classified up until 3 years ago.

 

[Jontg]

Is the woo implying what I think it's implying?

 

[TC329]

How did no one notice them on the ground between sunrise and impact?

well in the 3.5 hours of possible sunlight before the attack i don't imagine there were too many people driving around looking for lightpoles that were laying down out of sight anyways......

Lloyd saw one crash onto his car.

yeah thats all we have now is lloyd. none of the witnesses named in the media actually witnessed it and now we know the plane was on the NoC.

How does one get fooled into thinking they saw it enter the building?

how are illusions performed? point of view, perception, distraction......

He asked where it was, not where it wasn't.

well i can only say where it wasn't.

Only if you can show that the occupants were not those discovered in the Pentagon. It would help if you could venture a theory as to where they are now.

im sure they're dead.

What has that got to do with the question you were asked?

too tough to answer?

 

[beachnut]

Why would you notice an odd lightpole missing if it was daytime, when they wouldn't be used?


Lie. Lloyd claims he saw the heavy part of the light pole javelin through his windsheild- a physically impossible feat.


Priming from WTC attacks and subsequent media brainwashing.


Stupid question. That's what we're trying to find out.


"Occupants" were not discovered at the Pentagon. Body parts, on the other hand, were allegedly found, but the chain of custody is questionable.

A loaded question doesn't deserve an answer.

Do you even try to figure out 9/11. The VDOT guys are just up the hill, they can walk to see the their lamppost are on the ground. Funny stuff, you need to read first and even then... This means no one planted broken lamppost, you are trying to apologize for the terrorist again.

Have you heard of Breakaway lamppost, they were invented to save your life? Guess not. So here, see what you fail to comprehend.

Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building." "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."

So seeing 77 hit was what? You are not very good at being a terrorist apologist! Why?

You are the one who has the fantasy ideas on 9/11. Already a proven fact. List one of your ideas that is true. Right the list is zero.

The DNA is backed up by witnesses who were there to ensure timely notification of next of kin! Why do you disgrace the memory of the dead by making up fantasy ideas and being an apologist for terrorist?

You have nothing of value for 9/11; nothing... Talking about ..

well in the 3.5 hours of possible sunlight before the attack i don't imagine there were too many people driving around looking for lightpoles that were laying down out of sight anyways......

Ah, but the witnesses saw 77 knock them down! Funny how easy you are debunked as you post! Funny; Miller did it and you forgot to listen to your own interview. That is funny.

Yes, now TC says all those who disagree are liars

 

[TC329]

Well the fact that it is lying across the middle of the road you're driving on might get your attention.

challenge : show 1 light pole across a road that isn't near a cab.

 

[gumboot]

challenge : show 1 light pole across a road that isn't near a cab.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Ah, so now if a light pole is not in the middle of a street it goes unnoticed? The grounds keepers who were out there moving the lawn probably thought nothing of the matalic crunching sound and sparks as they ran over the light poles they didn't notice despite their huge size.

This over course overlooking the fact that they made this plan that had to be timed down to the very millisecond and to the inch, yet they also knocked down light poles in the wrong location.

And you guys wonder why no one takes you seriously?

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Hundre3ds of witnesses and plane parts all over the lawn yet the first report was "there has been an explosion at the pentagon". What you people need to realize is most of the evidence of a plane being there has just recently surfaced. It took atleast 3 or more years to do any debunking at all. Look at most of the debunker join dates
2007. Everything was classified up until 3 years ago.

being as the first report was from someone inside the building and at the other end, that makes perfect sense. If the guy in the other side of the building had reported a plane crash, then you might have a red flag. But an explosion is exactly what someone inside the building and on the opposite side would hear, do you not agree?

Or perhaps you could tell us what a plane hitting the other side of a building would sound like to a person in his location. Should it have sounded more like a balloon with the air rushing out?

 

[TC329]

thats a stupid little dog.

try again gumboot.

 

[PhantomWolf]

being as the first report was from someone inside the building and at the other end, that makes perfect sense. If the guy in the other side of the building had reported a plane crash, then you might have a red flag. But an explosion is exactly what someone inside the building and on the opposite side would hear, do you not agree?

Or perhaps you could tell us what a plane hitting the other side of a building would sound like to a person in his location. Should it have sounded more like a balloon with the air rushing out?

I think with all likelihood the first person to report it was a reporter for MSNBC who was stationed at the Pentagon and was on live at the time. He said something along the lines of "I don't want to alarm anyone but there has been what sounded like a huge explosion here. The whole building shook but I don't know what is going on."

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Yes, that was the first report. But as always the crackpots try to imply an explosion is a bomb for those stupid enough to think that bombs are the only possible causes of explosions.

 

[Travis]

Hundre3ds of witnesses and plane parts all over the lawn yet the first report was "there has been an explosion at the pentagon". What you people need to realize is most of the evidence of a plane being there has just recently surfaced. It took atleast 3 or more years to do any debunking at all. Look at most of the debunker join dates
2007. Everything was classified up until 3 years ago.

The very first responders not only noted the smell of jet fuel but saw unmistakable plane parts, like landing gear, mere minutes after the explosion when thousands of Pentagon workers were still scrambling about. Unless these part planters were invisible, and as fast as a superhero, there is no way it could be done.

There are many anecdotes in the book Firefight all about this.

 

[PhantomWolf]

The very first responders not only noted the smell of jet fuel but saw unmistakable plane parts, like landing gear, mere minutes after the explosion when thousands of Pentagon workers were still scrambling about. Unless these part planters were invisible, and as fast as a superhero, there is no way it could be done.

There are many anecdotes in the book Firefight all about this.

Many of the survivors were covered in Jet fuel, some were even treated for jet fuel inhalation. It was quite interesting watching Attack on the Pentagon the other night and watching firefighter after firefighter, and even a number of the Pentagon staff describing having to pull away and climb over aircraft parts.

 

[Travis]

Many of the survivors were covered in Jet fuel, some were even treated for jet fuel inhalation. It was quite interesting watching Attack on the Pentagon the other night and watching firefighter after firefighter, and even a number of the Pentagon staff describing having to pull away and climb over aircraft parts.

Yep, I guess they were all in on it.

 

[Caustic Logic]

The grounds keepers who were out there moving the lawn

So they planted the poles AND moved the lawn? You wacky JREFfers...

ok adam since you declared this maneuver is impossible within a relative short time after the release of this video please show us the math done on this video which proves this plane cannot do the manuever it is depicted doing in it or admit that you once again are lying.

You're right, I lied, just like I always do. I did not do the math on it and AFAIK no one else has yet either. Therefore it's totally a possible path, quite ordinary, and probably real, except this animation is also bogus, and dubious and true and whatever you said. You totally win, what a day for the Terrier!

 

[PhantomWolf]

So they planted the poles AND moved the lawn? You wacky JREFfers...

Well of course they had to move it, I mean they couldn't have it getting messed up when the plane hit it could they....

 

[TC329]

You're right,

i know

I lied,

i know

just like I always do.

i know

I did not do the math on it

i know

and AFAIK no one else has yet either.

i know

Therefore it's totally a possible path,

i know

quite ordinary,

i know

and probably real,

i know

except this animation is also bogus,

who is the source?

and dubious

why?

and true

right?

and whatever you said.

i said it shows a noc flightpath and contradicts the official account. do you disagree?

You totally win,

i know

what a day for the Terrier!

really? childish insult?

i could go there....or i could just laugh to myself to insure my account don't get banned since i got a warning about a post i made over 6 months ago yesterday.......