• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why does FAA/Norad animation show NoC flightpath?

TC329

Banned
T
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
1,453
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHjN4sfyqIc

This was just released, 7 years and 1 day after the attack, September 12th 2008, the government admits the plane was on the north side of the citgo. Strangely, they show it hitting the building still, but of course this is irreconcilable with all physical damage and all other data. The fall out from this will be interesting to say the least.
 
TC329 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHjN4sfyqIc

This was just released, 7 years and 1 day after the attack, September 12th 2008, the government admits the plane was on the north side of the citgo. Strangely, they show it hitting the building still, but of course this is irreconcilable with all physical damage and all other data. The fall out from this will be interesting to say the least.
Click to expand...
Your own witness, your own video debunks you. Now you post a turn that is impossible, just like your non turns. Why are you unable to use math and physics to figure this out?

Your Miller video proves your Flt 93 ideas false; why does your lack of knowledge on flying make you immune to reality? http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...y+miller&hl=en
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122665

You have taken the bait, John Farmer is about to release information to expose your ideas. He is teasing you. http://911files.info/blog/index.php

Why are your conclusions false, bad research or bad analysis?

Friday, September 28, 2001, 4:42:20 AM, mod date of the video. lol, old stuff, impossible paths. Good find, you took the bait again.
 
Last edited:
Beachnut said:
Your own witness, your own video debunks you. Now you post a turn that is impossible, just like your non turns. Why are you unable to use math and physics to figure this out?
Click to expand...
Why would the FAA release an animation that is physically impossible?
 
Your first order of business is to provide a source beyond YouTube that this is an "official" animation.
 
Tbone said:
Your first order of business is to provide a source beyond YouTube that this is an "official" animation.
Click to expand...


Indeed. Just because someone stuck FAA and NORAD logos on it is meaningless. In fact I think the NORAD logo is a bit of a "smoking gun", if you will, because there's no conceivable reason NORAD would be involved in such a video. And finally, the data to produce such a flight path would come from the NTSB not the FAA, and the NTSB's flightpath is markedly different.

So in a word, I call BS.
 
TC329 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHjN4sfyqIc

This was just released, 7 years and 1 day after the attack, September 12th 2008, the government admits the plane was on the north side of the citgo. Strangely, they show it hitting the building still, but of course this is irreconcilable with all physical damage and all other data. The fall out from this will be interesting to say the least.
Click to expand...

this video is a fake.
 
it's funny its almost like you question its authenticity but don't exactly have the cajones to call it a fake.
 
I've never understood this controversy...

So the guv faked a plane crash and then released data that showed their own fake crash didn't happen???
 
no.

they faked it and now they're releasing fake evidence to corroborate cit's evidence and yet still try to prove an impact.

and as soon as you guys put the cats down and erase lloyd from the history books they can get away with their evil plans. oh and that generator. and that tree top russell pickering fell in love with too.
 
Yes. Will someone please explain to us why the govt. would provide a black box with data that would go against their fake flight path?

Is the NWO suicidal or something? Do 9-11 Sheepers have any sense of logic left?
 
TC329 said:
no.

they faked it and now they're releasing fake evidence to corroborate cit's evidence and yet still try to prove an impact.
Click to expand...

Why are they doing this?

No one cares about CIT.
 
TC329 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHjN4sfyqIc

This was just released, 7 years and 1 day after the attack, September 12th 2008, the government admits the plane was on the north side of the citgo. Strangely, they show it hitting the building still, but of course this is irreconcilable with all physical damage and all other data. The fall out from this will be interesting to say the least.
Click to expand...

Well lemme see... the FDR and radar are both silent about this final stretch, and certainly show nothing like that radical banking maneuver. So they didn't get it from there. As you say, the physical evidence is a definite non-fit, so they didn't deduce this from the damage. Anyone who understands how planes fly and maneuver, like Beachnut here, could have told them it was impossible, so they apparently didn't consult much.

BUT it does match, almost to a T, the flight path your buddies made up to fuse some aberrant accounts together, again in impossibility. Therefore, they must have some magical connection to the *truly true truth* that transcends all evidence to the contrary.

Maybe they interviewed witnesses, and ignored those like Morin, Elgas, Hemphill, Riskus, Mcgraw, England, Timmerman, Vignola, Zakhem, Wheelhouse, Wallace, Stephens, Roberts, NEIT 405, etc, who place the plane on the damage path. Maybe they interviewed the same aberrant set CIT got their hands on?

Maybe they didn't know what to do with the final moments and copied the NTSB's erred north path, deducing the swerve in a similar way to what your buddies would later do, to connect error and reality.

It is weird, and quite so. What do YOU think it's based on, TC?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom