• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Fyziks 101

And I simply ask what is your explanation for the video I showed. How did 2 storeys destroy 15 storeys? How did the top section collapse simultaneously with the bottom? It is not rhetorical, I'd like to see an explanation from you.

Your questions make no sense.

What two storeys are you referring to?

What top section? Simultaneous?

Here are some still shots of that stupid video. Clarify your questions please.

http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/911_card_tower1.JPG
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/911_card_tower2.JPG
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/911_card_tower3.JPG
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/911_card_tower4.JPG
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/911_card_tower5.JPG
 
So, your saying that the final report wasnt proofed, and those spewing the official Govt lie didnt notice the bald faced lie, and bring it up so it would be corrected, and not left as the lie it is. Surely Robertson has read the report and would have noticed it?

So, the Commision should not be trusted with anything they state, they are all politicians who had zero qualifications to deal with Norad, tower construction, etc.

All those reading this take note of the fact the Commision had nobody qualified in they're camp to find out how the towers were constructed. They instead made some bald faced lie up. Got cha;)
You know what? You just showed what a trollish piece of crap you are....enjoy the rest of your hopefully short stay at JREF on ignore.
 

The question is simple. How did the top 2 storeys in the video I posted destroy the remaining 15 or so storeys below them?

This is a physics thread. Please show us your grasp of physics by producing an explanation for this global, gravity-driven collapse.

If you wish we can come to the simultaneity later.
 
You got it dude. Just like the squibs show in the videos.
Your "squibs" (will truthers ever learn what that word really means?) occur well away from the area collapsing, and clearly aren't blowing entire floors outside the building footprint. And how is it none of the videos showing the collapses have the sound of these extremely powerful bombs you are proposing? How were the bombs able to send all (and you do state that every bit of mass was ejected) material flying to just outside the footprint but no further, regardless of the great differences in mass of the debris?

And please don't tell me it's compressing of the air...the top of the building is gone! :rolleyes:
It's obviously compressing air, in fact all your "squibs" are apparently in mechanical floors and located where vents open to the outside... :rolleyes:
 
If the debris was all outside the footprints why were the tallest areas of the rubble pile directly above the footprints of the towers?
 
Your "squibs" (will truthers ever learn what that word really means?) occur well away from the area collapsing, and clearly aren't blowing entire floors outside the building footprint. And how is it none of the videos showing the collapses have the sound of these extremely powerful bombs you are proposing?

I guess you don't study much, or watch the videos of first responders,
or testimony where people are stating they heard and felt bombs.

Here are a few to watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39SuzYsK-9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFV0T_HLRuc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2A8VMg_B64

material flying to just outside the footprint but no further, regardless of the great differences in mass of the debris?

The debris that flew 350+ feet into WTC7 and cut through massive steel
support columns? Does that count too? Must have been some pretty strong
gravity to fly a football field away and THEN cut steel beams :rolleyes:

It's obviously compressing air, in fact all your "squibs" are apparently in mechanical floors and located where vents open to the outside... :rolleyes:

I didn't know you could have compression without a sealed environment,
and some sort of reduction in volume while maintaining the seal?

Awesome how you're all throwing out new theories to cope with the new
material. Keep on guessing, it really looks good on you.
 
They instead made some bald faced lie up. Got cha

Lying means... the person(s) doing so, actually know the truth, but choose to deceive.

Who do you think is lying ?
Is it a big list ?
How big ?
 
The question is simple. How did the top 2 storeys in the video I posted destroy the remaining 15 or so storeys below them?

This is a physics thread. Please show us your grasp of physics by producing an explanation for this global, gravity-driven collapse.

If you wish we can come to the simultaneity later.

What storeys? It's a frigging card tower about 5 feet tall.

None of the cards were secure...they're just laying against each other.

The cards themselves are just fine.

If you can show me an entire section of cards (as a whole) crushing through
the remaining card structure, we'll talk.

The point is, you can't provide a moment in time when a section/assembly
of cards stays in tact and drives through the supporting card structure.

This is a funny argument Shrinker. I'm only replying because it makes your
defense look dumb.
 
I didn't know you could have compression without a sealed environment,
and some sort of reduction in volume while maintaining the seal?

Awesome how you're all throwing out new theories to cope with the new
material. Keep on guessing, it really looks good on you.
Oh this is great..TF has been reduced to a babbling idiot who has nothing better to do than play semantical games.
 
I didn't know you could have compression without a sealed environment

I bet you think the space shuttle is heated on reentry by friction. It's not, the air in front of it is heated by compression, and that's just a flat surface moving through the air, no sealed container required.
 
I guess you don't study much, or watch the videos of first responders,
or testimony where people are stating they heard and felt bombs.

Here are a few to watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39SuzYsK-9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFV0T_HLRuc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2A8VMg_B64
youtube seems to be having issues right now, but is this the same old crap of people using similies? The one where truthers edit a bomb scare at the high school to make it sound like they're talking about the WTC? Do any of these people think there were bombs?

Did any of these reports of bombs refer to the collapse, or the time prior to collapse? Because you're claiming bombs during collapse.

Actual demo charges, btw, are extremely loud. Loud enough to be heard from miles away, so why aren't any audible in the many recordings?

The debris that flew 350+ feet into WTC7 and cut through massive steel support columns? Does that count too? Must have been some pretty strong gravity to fly a football field away and THEN cut steel beams :rolleyes:
Now all you have to do is use your world-class fyziks knowwledge to calculate the size of the bomb (use TNT equivalent) needed to send that material so far. Oh, and since real CDs don't use bombs anywhere near that powerful (for obvious reasons) explain why the NWO decided to use such incredibly powerful bombs to do what real CDs do with much, much less powerful explosives.

And why don't they make any sounds again? :rolleyes:

I didn't know you could have compression without a sealed environment, and some sort of reduction in volume while maintaining the seal?
There are, apprently, many things you don't know. Not my problem.

Awesome how you're all throwing out new theories to cope with the new material. Keep on guessing, it really looks good on you.
What new material? What new theory? This is the same recycled crap the truth movement has been peddling since its inception.
 
Last edited:
I bet you think the space shuttle is heated on reentry by friction. It's not, the air in front of it is heated by compression, and that's just a flat surface moving through the air, no sealed container required.

And?

The Space Shuttle produces squibs?

The Twins were built outside of the Earth's atmosphere? :boggled:

Are we done with the dumb comparisons yet?
 
And?

The Space Shuttle produces squibs?

The Twins were built outside of the Earth's atmosphere? :boggled:

Are we done with the dumb comparisons yet?
i dont think it was a comparison, just pointing out your lack of understanding of, well, anything

in this case, compression
 
I didn't know you could have compression without a sealed environment,
and some sort of reduction in volume while maintaining the seal?

If I clap my hands or swat a fly I get "compression". Nothing is sealed in either case.

How ignorant is it possible to get?
 
What storeys? It's a frigging card tower about 5 feet tall.

None of the cards were secure...they're just laying against each other.

The cards themselves are just fine.

Jeez Turbo, you're nearly there but I'll have to come back tomorrow since you obviously need time to focus on the actual question. The cards were secure enough to hold the structure upright, stable, and resistant to air currents and impacts. So how did the top two/three storeys of the tower destroy all fifteen storeys below?

How can a light object completely destroy a heavier one?

If you can show me an entire section of cards (as a whole) crushing through
the remaining card structure, we'll talk.

I have no idea why there's this new precondition.
 

Back
Top Bottom