• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AA77 FDR Data, Explained

OK, we're definitely breached the speed of stupidity in this thread now.

I would laugh if it wasn't just so pathetic. I mean Gage and his cardboard boxes are starting to look pretty pro compared to the arguments developing on this thread..
 
and the inner wall of a pentagon ring would be reinforced why? check again fool that particular wall had no steel reinforcing whatsoever. There wasn't even Durowall within the limestone brick wythes to reinforce it. it was merely a panel.

As far as the shape and size of the exit hole. It was not just the front landing gear that shaped the hole. The planes cargo, the passengers and interior finish and luggage and other cargo including fuel in the center tank are all contained withing the diameter of the fuselage. As the nose of the aircraft enters the building and is consumed the contents are still traveling 530 mph. You will notice the victim remains at the exit hole were mostly passengers that were herded to the back of the plane. While the remains identified as that of the hijackers were close to the entry hole.

Nice post, AW. Once again...Turbo shows his disingenuousness and lack of tact when sharing his view of that day. It's truly despicable and heartrenchingly sad and disturbing. I hope she grows up soon.
 
Last edited:
This is hilarious. "Fly over people". A tiny minority, even among those who believe 911 was an inside job, furiously debating what is obvious to any rational person is an untenable position claiming they have irrefutable proof of the murder of 3000 people. Not in the courts. Not in the world's media. Not in the law enforcement community, but on a relatively obscure internet forum.

This is scary koo koo.
 
Since all of you refuse to debate the facts and turn a blind eye, I did the work for you (especially Beachnut).
Here are some images from Google Earth. FDR data does not support the official government story. Proove me, and PFT wrong.
You guys are wrong or you would have a Pulitzer Prize! LOL Got a Prize yet? No, the world is watching and all they see is...

standup.jpg


Close up of radio beacon
Wow, a VOR with DME. Cool.

Close up of light poles on highway
Wow, poles. Super.

Close up of impact area
Wow, if only you knew how to measure distance.

Position of aircraft at 1.31 Nautical Miles from Beacon
Notes:
Out of range for sensor tolerance.
Altitude too high for RAD ALT, and Pressure Altitude.
Too close for impact time and speed of plane.
Does not line up with flight path, or damage path.

http://procision-auto.com/Tino/911_1.31_lightpoles.jpg
Out of range of what? Altitude too high for RADALT, means what? Too close? What is this RANT about? Oh, 77 was not over this point! Good job, you support the Official story flight path, that took down the lamppost. Good job. You just proved your conclusoin wrong. BTW, p4t have no theories, they are wrong, they have no theory. Like a football game, the lost, they did not play (as in no theory). Got the big piecutrre yet, DVDs vs truth. Truth lost! lol

Position of aircraft at 1.40 Nautical Miles from Beacon
Notes:
Altitude too high for RAD ALT, and Pressure Altitude.
Distance does not equal impact time and speed of plane.
Data inconsistent to allow plane to drop from altitude and hit poles.
Does not line up with flight path, or damage path.
http://procision-auto.com/Tino/911_1.4_lightpoles.jpg
I am pretty sure you left out something! Some point of light to explain your obtuseness. You left out 1.6 and 1.7. Why?

Position of aircraft at 1.50 Nautical Miles from Beacon
Notes:
Too far for impact time and speed of plane.
3100+ feet from Pentagon impact point.
Data inconsistent to allow plane to drop from altitude and hit poles.
Does not line up with flight path, or damage path.

http://procision-auto.com/Tino/911_1.5_lightpoles.jpg

WRONG, it is 2588 feet from the Pentagon, and you forgot to use the final true track heading of 61 degrees, this puts 77, with your precision FDR junk, at a point ready to hit the Pentagon, on schedule. You see, Hani just pushed far over on the stick (fact) check it out, the terrorist pilot makes the biggest ever down stick movement. Can you figure this out?

How ever, the following people have some things to say, and some of them give evidence that amplifies others observations. I found most of these comments at web sites of 9/11 truth, they present witnesses which support the "official story", but the web site guys have no clue. There is a boat load of people who saw 77 hit the Pentagon! With the DNA there, and 77 in smashed up pieces due to a 534 mph impact! I doubt you have the time to refute and prove each person, and the hundreds of others wrong.
Just a handful of hundreds! You should see all of them. You must of missed them. Are you calling all these people liars?; when only you lie about 77 not hitting the Pentagon, you were not there, you are late, over 6 years late! Welcome to 9/11.
Afework Hagos, a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck in a traffic jam near the Pentagon when the plane flew over. "There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lampposts on the way in."
Nevertheless, the aircarft went southwest near Springfield and then veered left over Arlington and then put the nose down coming over Ft Myer picking off trees and light poles near the helicopter pad next to building.

Terrance Kean, 35, who lives in a 14-story building nearby, heard the loud jet engines and glanced out his window.
"I saw this very, very large passenger jet," said the architect, who had been packing for a move. "It just plowed right into the side of the Pentagon. The nose penetrated into the portico. And then it sort of disappeared, and there was fire and smoke everywhere. . . . It was very sort of surreal."

...
Mary Ann Owens, a journalist with Gannett News Service - was driving along by the side of the Pentagon. Here, she recalls the events of that horrific day and her feelings about the tragedy 12 months on. The sound of sudden and certain death roared in my ears as I sat lodged in gridlock on Washington Boulevard, next to the Pentagon on September 11. Up to that moment I had only experienced shock by the news coming from New York City and frustration with the worse-than-normal traffic snarl ... but it wasn't until I heard the demon screaming of that engine that I expected to die. Between the Pentagon's helicopter pad, which sits next to the road, and Reagan Washington National Airport a couple of miles south, aviation noise is common along my commute to the silver office towers in Rosslyn where Gannett Co Inc. were housed last autumn. But this engine noise was different. It was too sudden, too loud, too encompassing. Looking up didn't tell me what type of plane it was because it was so close I could only see the bottom. Realising the Pentagon was its target, I didn't think the careering, full-throttled craft would get that far. Its downward angle was too sharp, its elevation of maybe 50 feet, too low. Street lights toppled as the plane barely cleared the Interstate 395 overpass. Gripping the steering wheel of my vibrating car, I involuntarily ducked as the wobbling plane thundered over my head. Once it passed, I raised slightly and grimaced as the left wing dipped and scraped the helicopter area just before the nose crashed into the southwest wall of the Pentagon. Still gripping the wheel, I could feel both the car and my heart jolt at the moment of impact. An instant inferno blazed about 125 yards from me. The plane, the wall and the victims disappeared under coal-black smoke, three-storey tall flames and intense heat. As the thudding stopped, screams of horror and hysteria rose from the line of cars (...) The full impact of actually being alive overwhelmed me. A mere 125 yards had made me a witness instead of a casualty. Survival wasn't a miracle, it was luck ... pure luck.

Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building." "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."

Creed, Dan He and two colleagues from Oracle software were stopped in a car near the Naval Annex, next to the Pentagon, when they saw the plane dive down and level off. "It was no more than 30 feet off the ground, and it was screaming. It was just screaming. It was nothing more than a guided missile at that point," Creed said. "I can still see the plane. I can still see it right now. It's just the most frightening thing in the world, going full speed, going full throttle, its wheels up," Creed recalls.

Hemphill, Albert From the view of the Navy Annex : After a few moments, Lt Gen Ron Kadish, Director of the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization entered the Secure Conference Room to pursue the day's activities and do real work. This office, with two nice windows and a great view of the monuments, the Capitol and the Pentagon was "good digs" by any Pentagon standard. I walked in the office and stood peering out of the window looking at the Pentagon. As I stood there, I instinctively ducked at the extremely loud roar and whine of a jet engine spooling up. Immediately, the large silver cylinder of an aircraft appeared in my window, coming over my right shoulder as I faced the Westside of the Pentagon directly towards the heliport. The aircraft, looking to be either a 757 or Airbus, seemed to come directly over the annex, as if it had been following Columbia Pike - an Arlington road leading to Pentagon. The aircraft was moving fast, at what I could only be estimate as between 250 to 300 knots. All in all, I probably only had the aircraft in my field of view for approximately 3 seconds. The aircraft was at a sharp downward angle of attack, on a direct course for the Pentagon. It was "clean", in as much as, there were no flaps applied and no apparent landing gear deployed. He was slightly left wing down as he appeared in my line of sight, as if he'd just "jinked" to avoid something. As he crossed Route 110 he appeared to level his wings, making a slight right wing slow adjustment as he impacted low on the Westside of the building to the right of the helo, tower and fire vehicle around corridor 5. What instantly followed was a large yellow fireball accompanied by an extremely bass sounding, deep thunderous boom. The yellow fireball rose quickly as black smoke engulfed the entire Westside of the Pentagon, obscuring the whole of the heliport. I could feel the concussion and felt the shockwave of the blast impact the window of the Annex, knocking me against the desk.

Liebner, Lincoln After the second plane hit the World Trade Center, Major Lincoln Leibner jumped in his pickup truck and raced to the Pentagon. As he ran to an entrance, he heard jet engines and turned in time to see the American Airlines plane diving toward the building. "I was close enough that I could see through the windows of the airplane, and watch as it as it hit," he said. "There was no doubt in my mind what I was watching. Not for a second. It was accelerating," he said. "It was wheels up, flaps up, engines full throttle. "

Richard Benedetto, a USA TODAY reporter, saw the plane slam into the Pentagon. "It sounded like an artillery shell. It hit on the west side of the building, near the helipad."

Vin Narayanan I left home at 8:15 a.m. on Sept. 11 to begin what is normally a 35-minute commute. But traffic was unusually thick that day. As I inched my way toward Washington, I considered taking an alternate route — one that would not take me past the Pentagon. But for some reason, I decided to drive my usual way in. At 9 a.m., sports-talk radio began reporting the attacks on World Trade Center. ... traffic continued to crawl. At 9:35 a.m., I pulled alongside the Pentagon. With traffic at a standstill, my eyes wandered around the road, looking for the cause of the traffic jam. Then I looked up to my left and saw an American Airlines jet flying right at me. The jet roared over my head, clearing my car by about 25 feet. The tail of the plane clipped the overhanging exit sign above me as it headed straight at the Pentagon. The windows were dark on American Airlines Flight 77 as it streaked toward its target, only 50 yards away. The hijacked jet slammed into the Pentagon at a ferocious speed. But the Pentagon's wall held up like a champ. It barely budged as the nose of the plane curled upwards and crumpled before exploding into a massive fireball. The people who built that wall should be proud. Its ability to withstand the initial impact of the jet probably saved thousands of lives. I hopped out of my car after the jet exploded, nearly oblivious to a second jet hovering in the skies. (darn, down below we find the second plane close to the event was asked to look, a C-130, only a few thousand feet away
Rodney Washington (400 feet from the lamppost, facing the Pentagon!)
, a systems engineer for a Pentagon contractor, was stuck in stand-still traffic a few hundred yards from the Pentagon when the American Airlines jet roared overhead from the southwest. ''It was extremely loud, as you can imagine, a plane that size, it was deafening,'' Washington said. The plane was flying low and rapidly descended, Washington said, knocking over light poles before hitting the ground on a helicopter pad just in front of the Pentagon and essentially bouncing into it. It ''landed there and the momentum took it into the Pentagon,'' Washington said. ''There was a very, very brief delay and then it exploded.'' Washington speculated that it could have been worse: ''If it had kept altitude a little bit higher it probably would have landed in the middle of the Pentagon, in that court.'' (the delay, the time it takes sound to travel! Wow)

Phillip Thompson
There is no doubt in my mind that last week’s attack on America was an act of war. I fought in the Gulf War. I saw bombs and missiles explode overhead. I saw people die. And when, on my way to work Sept. 11, I saw an American Airlines jet come overhead and slam into the Pentagon, it all came back. Hard. I was sitting in heavy traffic in the I-395 HOV lanes about 9:45 a.m., directly across from the Navy Annex. I could see the roof of the Pentagon and, in the distance, the Washington Monument. I heard the scream of a jet engine and, turning to look, saw my driver’s side window filled with the fuselage of the doomed airliner. It was flying only a couple of hundred feet off the ground — I could see the passenger windows glide by. The plane looked as if it were coming in for a landing — cruising at a shallow angle, wings level, very steady. But, strangely, the landing gear was up and the flaps weren’t down. I knew what was about to happen, but my brain couldn’t quite process the information. Like the other commuters on the road, I was stunned into disbelief. The fireball that erupted upon impact blossomed skyward, and the blast hit us in a wave. I don’t remember hearing a sound. It was so eerily similar to another experience during the Gulf War — a missile strike that killed a Marine in my unit — that when I jumped out of my SUV, I felt like I’d jumped into my past and was in combat once again. The feeling was the same, but the context was all wrong. My first instinct was to run toward the Pentagon, where I knew people were dead, wounded and dying. But the building was on fire, and even if I made it to the scene, I couldn’t be of much help. I tried to call my wife, but the cell-phone circuits were jammed. Commuters were beginning to panic — some turned their cars around and drove back down the northbound HOV lanes, against traffic. Others wailed and sobbed. Across the way, the Navy Annex parking lot was full of screaming people. Sirens howled in the distance. I started directing cars to pull to the side of the HOV lanes to make way for emergency vehicles. On the way in to work, I’d heard about the two planes that attacked the World Trade Center, and now that came to mind. What if “dash two” was inbound to the Pentagon? Then a gray C-130 flew overhead, setting off a new round of panic. I tried to reassure people that the plane was not a threat. All around me people began to panic, fleeing for their lives. Afraid of being trapped, I drove through a gap in the median barrier and drove across 395 to an exit ramp. I turned south into Crystal City, trying to call my wife the entire time. At a red light, two frightened women approached me and asked for a ride to safety. They said they had just fled the Pentagon. I offered to take them wherever they needed to go and managed through the rest of the morning and afternoon to get them to their destinations. It wasn’t until much later that the shock wore off. I was home then, able to watch TV. Now, for the first time, I was seeing the images that most people had been watching all day. And sitting there in my living room, I was consumed by a feeling that haunted me for months after coming home from the Gulf War: an irrational fear that at any moment something was going to crash near me and kill me. Once again, I found myself trying to shake off the experiences of a person who’s gone to war. I struggled all day for context for the event, an explanation for the shock and fear I felt as I watched TV. This is, after all, America. This is our home. Anyone who has served in the military understands the context of war — but war, through American eyes, takes place far from home, on distant shores. And though I, like many others, always feared a terrorist attack on America was possible, it was excruciating to watch war come to America before my very eyes.
Neat, the witnesses destroy your conclusion. And support the FDR.

The terrorist demonstrated the ability to dive at VII greater then 6600 feet per minute, your simple 5400 feet per second descent is a piece of CAKE! Pilot term for easy as pie!

You make big errors in your own work, in the wrong direction for you. neat.

This is what you can do. Take 61 degree true track and plot that from the impact zone (true track has something to do with true north, look it up). Notice how the lamppost line up with this track, gee, the evidence lines up with 77's flight path track found in the FDR, thus the FDR does support the "official story". Darn, the anti-gobermint forces lead by Balsamo are soundly defeated again, by facts, and an American fighting man (albeit a gas passer). Plot where 77 could be. If you take the data literally, then you only have to loose 360 feet in 4 seconds and that is very possible (gee, 77 actually hit the Pentagon, only fools can't figure it out). So you have failed, p4t will continuer to sell DVDs to real dumb guys, and you will tune cars and make great errors in understanding 9/11. What is new?

Have fun trying to prove otherwise with your excuses and theories.
I already prove you wrong, why are you unable to do the research, you ignore everything and make up bs posts like this that are almost as bad as my posts.


I'm only going to answer to this specific post information, and get back on the real topic of this thread.
When will you answer something, or present evidence?

Still looking to hear from Beachnut, Bje, Funk de Fino, Bananaman, eeyore1954, Anti-sophist, Rearheat, Wildcat, Stateofgrace, and Jaydeehess.
We used evidence to figure out 77 hit the Pentagon. You wave your hands present hearsay from a DVD salesman, have ZERO evidence, showed up 6 years too late, and say 77 did not hit the Pentagon. ...

Anybody good enough to step up to the challenge?
Present rational evidence. You can't, may be time to move on.
 
Last edited:
One of CIT quadruple independantly corroborated witness put Flight 77 no more than 3 feet above the Navy Annex. How does that jive with the "too high" claims?
 
Very lame attempt at spin...


That 9 foot hole had zero damage right next to it, even rebar was removed/sliced cleanly...nothing sitting outside in that pile could have made such a nice clean hole...and you know it.

The Damage assesment team even clearly stated all the major pieces of the plane were gone by the time it went in 100 feet or so.Not that they were even allowed to see the exit hole, because they werent

If a piece of debris made it that far, with that force, it would have actually collapsed the wall in that area, not made a surgical hole with rebar cleanly sliced through..

My analysis above(the shaped charge analysis) clearly refutes your hearsay, and supports Occams Razor as compared to the official lie twenty fold.

The evidence DOESNT support your weak theory, but does mine nicely...you lose:D



Let me ask you a direct question, i want to hear your response to it...


Q.The Pentagon building performance group was not allowed to see the exit hole, why would you think that was. As they had been tasked to study cause and effect at the Pentagon?


There is no rebar in the hole or the wall. The hole is not clean. Aircraft wheel are very heavy and dense. You could not lift one and two people would probably not manage to lift one. Try firing that heavy wheel at a brick wall at very high speed and you stand behind tha wall and we will see if you survive OK?

Airrcaft are also not exclusively made from aluminium. the landing gear is among the heaviest most dense and strong parts of the aircraft and also contain steel parts. You could not lift them. Two people will struggle to lift them. Fire them very fast at a brick wall and repeat the experiment above.

You see the problem is that I know these things because I worked on aircraft for 12 years. What is your experience that it allows you to tell experts they are wrong?

You even showed a picture drowning in firefighters water from fighting the fire and claimed they had not even arrived yet. Now you tell me. Was that a mistake or a lie? You wanted a picture of landing gear outside the hole and it was given to you.

Using occams razor please explain to me why they needed to use a wall breaching kit from inside the Pentagon?

Who would have operated it?
When would they have operated it?
When did the damage assessment team enter the building?
 
roundhead. In post 1015 you said
<snip>
Btw, over the weekend, i had a chance to test a question posed on the internet....

I have a steel wheelbarrow...i dumped two gallons of kerosene in it, after throwing a coke can in it i had just drank, and lit it....and let it burn out.

Guess what, the coke can was perfectly intact, except it was fairly hard to tell it was still a coke...could have been a pepsi.:D

<snip>

Inpost 1067 I asked

What ignition source did you use?

I am still interested in the answer to this question, and it should be simple to answer.

Thanks
 
Wow, if only you knew how to measure distance.

If you only knew how to prove your case with examples rather than
reply with nonsense. Show us the proper measurement please.

Out of range of what? Altitude too high for RADALT, means what? Too close? What is this RANT about? Oh, 77 was not over this point!


At the last recorded value of DME (1.5), and heading on the flight
path as stated by the official story, that's the radius intersect point.

With that information, ALT, Speed, g, the plane can't possible dive down
and hit the light poles, then level off to hit the Pentagon.

Once again, maybe you can prove us all wrong by actaully doing something
other than bs replies.
Good job, you support the Official story flight path, that took down the lamppost. Good job. You just proved your conclusoin wrong. BTW, p4t have no theories, they are wrong, they have no theory. Like a football game, the lost, they did not play (as in no theory). Got the big piecutrre yet, DVDs vs truth. Truth lost! lol

FDR data is not theory. You might want to look up the difference between
theory and evidence.

I am pretty sure you left out something! Some point of light to explain your obtuseness. You left out 1.6 and 1.7. Why?

This shows how little you think. At 1.6, and 1.7, the plane is too far off
course to hit the light poles, or match the official story. It's no where
near the highway at 1.6, or 1.7 DME :rolleyes:

A perfect example of someone who doesn't do the math and just talks out
of his...

WRONG, it is 2588 feet from the Pentagon, and you forgot to use the final true track heading of 61 degrees, this puts 77, with your precision FDR junk


No, YOU are wrong. How do you expect to line up the aircraft with the light
poles and impact hole otherwise? Are you following your replies at all?
Study the official theory much? Look at the FDR data much? Obviously not...
unless you believe Hani (*cough) did a few s-turns within 600 feet at 500 MPH? LOL!

Once again, the rest of your post is junk.

Let's see some diagrams, and calculations. Afterall, you are a pilot?
 
We also know why Anti-Sophist has disappeared from this thread.

Because I've already conclusively demonstrated that pilotsfor911truth's analysis is fundamentally flawed and the specs/regs/etc that they quote don't mean what they think they mean. And yet Turbofan, the total ignorant charlatan that he is, continues to repeat that has **proven me wrong** by quoting regulations and pretending they mean things that they don't.

I've proven my point, beyond any shadow of reasonable doubt. The only doubt left is from people who are either too stupid or too stubborn to read and understand what I've said. I have no interest in repeating myself to the stupid and the stubborn.

The so-called "JREF Experts" dont want to debate because they claim we are "dolts" or "loons".. or there is nothing to debate?
Because that debate has nothing to do with the truth and everything to do with attention which turns into BBQ aprons sales. You are charlatans and that is trivially proven by the number of times I've proven people in this thread wrong only to have them ignore my points and continue to repeat the same tired nonsense.

If that were the case, they could expose us in short order. It is clear who will expose the dolts in short order.
I've already exposed you in short order. Dozens of times. What would be the point of another?

I suspect Anti-Sophist left this thread for the same reason he refuse to debate anyone at P4T.
This is actually true. Just not for the reason you think. See above. There's not point proving people wrong more then once. I've done it more times then I care to count and none of you are listening.
 
Last edited:
Well, we know for a fact that the next wall, 30 or so feet away suffered zero damage from the "landing gear"

We dont see the landing gear in any photos shot from inside the hole looking out.

So if you are correct, the landing gear MUST be somewhere between the hole and the next wall, laying out in the open. In a perfect place to get a nice photograph of, and nicely tie the story together.

Kindly show me a photo of it, and you win the arguement.

Face it, if the landing gear existed, there would be scores of photo's of it, and they would all support the official story.

The fact is, there are zero photo's, you lose.

1 - The photo is below
2 - That's your personal incredulity talking, it could have existed even if there were no photos
3 - See below

Did it bounce back a few feet after hitting the wall? I can see into the hole,
but I still don't see any landing gear.

Guess you weren't looking in the right place.

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
I'd love to interview you on 'Hardfire' without the distraction of a conspiracy liar shouting nonsense. If you're interested in doing a one-on-one, let me know.

This does interest me. Telephone or live? Travel may be difficult for me.
 
Here, this should shut your hole


[qimg]http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/132-large.jpg[/qimg]



The C-ring wall was constructed of steel mesh and rebar reinforced brick, 8 inches (20 cm) thick. Details are shown here.
You dolt. That is not rebar, that's conduit. There is even a junction bracket in the picture.
 
Because I've already conclusively demonstrated that pilotsfor911truth's analysis is fundamentally flawed and the specs/regs/etc that they quote don't mean what they think they mean. And yet Turbofan, the total ignorant charlatan that he is, continues to repeat that has **proven me wrong** by quoting regulations and pretending they mean things that they don't.

Is that so? Why are you asking for t1-t5 timing if you have this all figured out?

I linked you up to the ARINC 717, and FDR documentation. You now have
all the information you need to show transfer rates and propagation times.

Are you still in the dark? Would you like to go one-on-one and discuss
the timing charts?

I've also explained how the buffer is refreshed every cycle and read out with
a time stamp. Check out the documentation. You therefore cannot have
old sensor data written with current data!

Also, RADAR altitude has been decoded so you can put your lag/pressure
calibration to rest.

Don't forget, you were quoted as stating the following:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2237875&postcount=337
I think it's impossible for anyone to say with certainty how much data is missing except the people who actually looked at the recorder. I think the estimate in the 1-2 seconds range is probably accurate, though.

Now, why don't you show me how you would position the plane based on the
following info:

- the NTSB impact time
- speed
- DME
- official flight path

Let's see how you conclude the FDR data as coming from the aircraft
that hit the light poles and Pentagon
 
How about you and I on the phone? My tab? Probably easier than writing
on a message board huh?

I don't think anyone in their right mind would give you their phone number, Turbo.

Bananaman.
 
This does interest me. Telephone or live? Travel may be difficult for me.

I would love to watch an episode of Hardfire with experts such as Anti-sophist interviewed.

Perhaps you could have Ron verify your qualifications, without your identity, as an add to the program...would love to see you clarify this FDR nonsense once and for all...

TAM:)
 
I linked you up to the ARINC 717, and FDR documentation. You now have all the information you need to show transfer rates and propagation times.
And yet, there's not a single FDR expert who supports the PfffT.

Instead of debating on the internet, why don't you see if you can get an actual FDR expert to support your nonsense? Of course, we all know it's because you can't.

Charlatans, frauds, hacks, and snake-oil salesmen is all you have.

Why don't you post a pic of yourself all decked out in your PffffT merch?
 

Back
Top Bottom