Anti-sophist
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 1,542
I'd just like to be clear about something.
I've severely lost my patience for repeating myself which is all I've ever done with arguing with uneducated truthers. Specifically, in regards to Turbofan, he's ignorance is so unbelievable that he disagrees with obvious and simple things such as the existence of a digital buffer in the FDR. He hasn't read the original post, let alone comprehended it. He has absolutely no idea what the obvious flaws in his and PfT "research" is despite me having it spelled it out no less then a dozen times throughout this thread.
If the goal was to keep repeating the same tired flawed logic until I stop responding, then mission accomplished. Now he's moved on clearly into the "declaring" victory phase of his sad presentation by mentioning things such as "schooling" me or whatever other childish remarks he's made of that ilk. I'm not really interested in arguing with someone so entirely uninterested in the truth as to revel in that type of absurd ignorance. He is the epitome of the famous research finding that the more incompetent and ignorant someone is, the more arrogant and confident they are in their expertise.
They continue to quote things that are simply inapplicable to what they are trying to prove. His last attempt was the ARINC standard which does govern a tiny fraction of the possible time slip error. It governs a small aspect of the time-slip, not the entire thing. They are too ignorant to realize it and instead just keep searching for regulations that quote times and they keep pretending those times apply to the things they want. ARINC, ED55, etc, etc, do not govern the "amount of time event X that was measured on the last line of my data file and impact". They cannot even correctly understand what these regulations are telling them. They just see a number and pretend that number is what they want it to mean. For god's sake, Turbofan et al. are trying to quote a provably impossible number of 500ms as the magic number. The fact that that number is mathematically impossible never occured to them. The problem isn't the standard. Or the design. Or the systems. Or the real number system. It's their understanding of what the 500ms actually means.
I've "outgrown" my desire to repeat myself over and over and over to people who are willfully ignorant because their ignorance serves their own purposes. I have two choices, argue forever with someone who isn't interested in the truth, or give up and let them declare victory. I've chosen the latter.
I read the forum alot but my participation was waning heavily before he showed up, and I briefly jumped back in only to be reminded how pointless it all is.
I've severely lost my patience for repeating myself which is all I've ever done with arguing with uneducated truthers. Specifically, in regards to Turbofan, he's ignorance is so unbelievable that he disagrees with obvious and simple things such as the existence of a digital buffer in the FDR. He hasn't read the original post, let alone comprehended it. He has absolutely no idea what the obvious flaws in his and PfT "research" is despite me having it spelled it out no less then a dozen times throughout this thread.
If the goal was to keep repeating the same tired flawed logic until I stop responding, then mission accomplished. Now he's moved on clearly into the "declaring" victory phase of his sad presentation by mentioning things such as "schooling" me or whatever other childish remarks he's made of that ilk. I'm not really interested in arguing with someone so entirely uninterested in the truth as to revel in that type of absurd ignorance. He is the epitome of the famous research finding that the more incompetent and ignorant someone is, the more arrogant and confident they are in their expertise.
They continue to quote things that are simply inapplicable to what they are trying to prove. His last attempt was the ARINC standard which does govern a tiny fraction of the possible time slip error. It governs a small aspect of the time-slip, not the entire thing. They are too ignorant to realize it and instead just keep searching for regulations that quote times and they keep pretending those times apply to the things they want. ARINC, ED55, etc, etc, do not govern the "amount of time event X that was measured on the last line of my data file and impact". They cannot even correctly understand what these regulations are telling them. They just see a number and pretend that number is what they want it to mean. For god's sake, Turbofan et al. are trying to quote a provably impossible number of 500ms as the magic number. The fact that that number is mathematically impossible never occured to them. The problem isn't the standard. Or the design. Or the systems. Or the real number system. It's their understanding of what the 500ms actually means.
I've "outgrown" my desire to repeat myself over and over and over to people who are willfully ignorant because their ignorance serves their own purposes. I have two choices, argue forever with someone who isn't interested in the truth, or give up and let them declare victory. I've chosen the latter.
I read the forum alot but my participation was waning heavily before he showed up, and I briefly jumped back in only to be reminded how pointless it all is.
Last edited:
