Sorry, but this post just contained so much wrongness that I had to pick it apart.
The masons(Knight Templar) had France in debt
The King, you mean. Quite likely, but more to the point, the order was rich. Philip was in dire need of money to finance the war with England; he'd already evicted the jews and seized their property, as well as levied a tax on the clergy. The last act led to a head-on conflict with the pope, culminating in Guillaume de Nogaret briefly taking the aging pope prisoner, which hastened his death. The Templars were simply next in line.
,so orders were sent to all garrisons to be opened on the 13 th (forget the month)Orders were to kill the masons.
Flatly incorrect - the Templars would have had plenty of fight if directly assaulted. Instead, they were arrested on charges of heresy and tortured until confessing. Seizing this excuse, Philip influenced the new pope to dissolve the Order. The possessions were supposedly going to the Order of S:t John, but the majority found their way into Philip's hands instead.
And the French revolution was the pay back for the e-lite of France. How could a disorganised mob of starving peasants over come the e-lite? They had help.
Well, the so-called elite had not really had any real military importance since about the 15th century, and were increasingly lagging behind the merchants and financiers in financial power. Not to say that they were pushovers but... well, maybe they were. What few attempts were made at restoring the old regime tended to end badly.
And I would think the popes interference in the purge of the masons would be why catholics we excluded from the order till now.
Actually, they weren't. It's just the Catholic church who forbade its members from joining, not the Masons.
As for the rest, it's not even worth comment.
