Laughable. You make frequent use of absurd strawmen, such as "7,000 FBI agents in on it, yada yada". Apparently, you never heard of the concept of division of labor, and it stretches your imagination beyond it's capacity to consider that covert operations are designed to have a minimal number of operators and knowldege is shared on a 'need to know' basis.
You are so in love with your ludicrous strawmen that you think you've demonstrated "mathematical impossibility"! Why don't you take your laughable demonstration to a statistician who has a lick of common sense re division of labor and what the 'covertness' in a covert operation means, and then tell us what the statistician has to say?
I used to work on the same table with two other programmers, and one of them - a very bright kid we hired for the summer - had stuff in the code that neither of us could figure out, which we discovered after he left. Your brilliant logic demands that we must have 'been in on it', and the reason I commented these inscrutable code statements (partly in jest) '"What was Dave thinking?" was to cover our tracks. Not.
You really don't know what you're talking about, do you? No, I'm not referring to the contents of your email box, etc.
I have been referring to the 911 Truth Movement without specifying it's definition. What I was thinking about was simply those who believed in LIHOP or MIHOP. I was not considering ito people who stand in public places with signs that say "911 was an Inside Job", if that's what you were thinking.
What were you thinking?
A garbage pail gathers a lot of flies. In my experiences of discussing and debating things at the stj911 forum, I have trouble recalling anybody that hated Jews. Your hysterical smearing notwithstanding, your sampling technique - consisting of your email spam plus assorted forums plus some youtube videos - may not only be a lousy one, in general, but may be additionally distorted due to your keeping of bad company.
Your continued failure to admit that you don't have a scientifically valid way of judging anti-Semitism amongst 911 Truthers just speaks to either your irrationality, or dishonesty. You have been asked for real, statistically significant evidence a number of times on this thread, yet you continue to dodge and whine. But do keep it up, won't you? I think your critical thinking skills could stand additional exposition.
Because they have a brain? Because they don't find a compulsive need to smear groups of people that take seriously ideas that they don't agree with? Because they understand something about probability and statistics? Because even though you ducked my questions re determining who is a shill, other people know that most shills won't be dumb enough to admit it, and so this is generally something that can't be determined?
All of the above?
Will I? Are you sure? I'm sure there's lot's of 'genuine' anti-Semitism, to go along with the shills. But what is a lot, as a percentage of 911 Truthers? 911 Truthers who are WTC 7 aware? You don't know, and you are making it obvious that you don't know. Your "one third" lower bound is not based on anything scientific.
I believe you're referring to Nico Haupt. AFAIK, he has been banned from a number of 911 web sites. Furthermore, he's just one person.
You are also just one person, and I wouldn't dream of imputing your atrocious manners and lunatic extrapolations (with all the fanatism that implies) to the masses of people who don't believe in either LIHOP or MIHOP. Perhaps if I drank the same Kool-Aid as you do, and (God Forbid) got cc'd your emails, I would start spouting the same sort of slanderous piffle that you seem to be in love with. I'd just have to change my tune, a bit, and presto, wham-o, I too could be a smear-merchant, but with an opposite target.
I think I'll pass.
You confuse your imaginative and distorted viewpoint with reality. Their are rational tools - probability and statistics - that could be brought to bear on the subject of discussion (given a sufficient budget...), but you are not interested in that. I remind readers that you have not answered my question about anti-Semitism in the general population. I'm sure that people who don't have the same anti-Semitism-smear axe to grind, as you yourself do, will be able to come to a reasonable conclusion as to why you have avoided the question.
No actually, I haven't. I've studied mathematical logic. Your fierce irrationality might be mitigated by pondering the implications of said tautology. For one thing, if you impute anti-Semitism to individuals that can't be anti-Semitic, something is wrong - very wrong - with your 'reasoning'.
One-third, eh? In a way, I'm impressed that you would post a non-trivial number. Of course, you have no more statistically significant evidence for such a belief than you had for your previous, more nebulous estimate of "more or less than half".
Last edited:
