• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I want to create a world were I can live symmetrical quantity of weeks in differently alternative social environments.
1 symmetrical quantity weeks of freedom and weeks of job.
2 symmetrical quantity weeks in cosmopolitan, international and national environments (for me Russian and Jewish environments)
3 symmetrical quantity weeks in liberal and in socialistic environments.
4 Symmetrical quantity weeks in Judaic, Christian, Muslim and Buddhist religious practices environments.
5 Symmetrical quantity weeks in natively speaking Russian, Hebrew, Yiddish and English environment.

I want to live in such society were every man has so good universal high education base, that he can change his profession on almost every new one after not less than 26 weeks of training and learning according his free will.
And he will have a real opportunity to get a contract on every place he wants according his new profession if he successfully go throw the professional test of course.
All men that go throw the professional tests will get this place for 26 weeks according his order in group of persons that went successfully throw the test.

I can sacrifice every 4 from those 5 points for even one of them to become realize really worldwide.
Because I am sure that 4 others will be certainly realize too in this case.
 
Thanks, but I'll take my doctors, architects, engineers, veterinarians, pilots, etc. with the years of training they get now.
 
I want to create a world were I can live symmetrical quantity of weeks in differently alternative social environments.
1 symmetrical quantity weeks of freedom and weeks of job.
2 symmetrical quantity weeks in cosmopolitan, international and national environments (for me Russian and Jewish environments)
3 symmetrical quantity weeks in liberal and in socialistic environments.
4 Symmetrical quantity weeks in Judaic, Christian, Muslim and Buddhist religious practices environments.
5 Symmetrical quantity weeks in natively speaking Russian, Hebrew, Yiddish and English environment..

Well, congratulations. I want to be independently wealthy and spend the rest of my days sipping margaritas on my own private Greek island and cashing royalty cheques from my books.

Unfortunately, the universe is not obliged to pay attention to either of our wishes -- and in your case, that's a very good thing indeed.

I'm not sure why you think that symmetry is the be-all and end-all of human existence, but I assure you that it's not.
 
I want to create a world

I wish you all the luck in the world!

However, as you seem incapable of creating a simple coherent sentence, I suggest that you stand by to make preparations to get ready to anticipate disappointment

I want to live in such society were every man has so good universal high education base

You are not the first to express such Utopian ideals

However, I suspect (and hope) that you are unique

I'm not sure why you think that symmetry is the be-all and end-all of human existence

'Tis a mystery

bi-polar?
 
I want to create a world were ...etc...strings of impracticable nonsense...etc. etc. etc.

Stop right there. You are not in a position do do this. You can't even spell it! Have you actually asked any reasonable number of people whether they would wish to live in the kind of insanely programmed rotating social arrangement you propose? Do you really think all you have to do is build it and they will come, or are you planning to impose it?
 
Stop right there

@bruto

Time for you to pause?

Do you really think

It's obvious that you can and do think :)

But... I suspect that you might be being overly generous to NC who - it seems - only has hopes and visions to shape some twisted beliefs into a bizarre, hallucinogenic, nightmare world he can see but not describe
 
My base profession is designer of mechanical handling machines.
I was a project manager in the Soviet Union.
I had no one of my machines that was not realized in metal.

In Israel I was a repair mechanic in American High Tech enterprise - Vishey.
The demanding up time in high tech industry is 96%.
Up time in my part was 98%!
I had 150 units of different modern equipment.
Every hour when the unit not works cost $ 1000.
It means that in every 100 hours of my working shift I gave $300000 of economy compare the middle employee.
I worked about 180 hours in a month.
So for a year I gave economy 180*12*300000/100=$6480000.

The society I have designed has “up time” of lifestyle efficiency near 100% almost in every lifestyle point.

I want to give some simple examples.
If you have your own car you use it in the middle not more than an hour a day, but if you get a taxi or a rent car for definite goal you use it with efficiency near 100%.

If you have your meal in restaurant you usually eat near 100% of it but if you make shopping you don’t eat even 70% of meal.
30% of your meal becomes garbage.

If you live in your own house or in the rent flat you almost 60% of your time are not their, and most of other 40% of time when you are their you simply sleep.
It is much clever to live in sleeping hotel and pay for those 8 hours – you sleep there.

You learned a great number of professional subjects in your life and went throw hard examinations, but you use not more than 2-3% of those subjects.

I need one more apartment only for clothes and perfume of my wife.
And the person who uses steeliest and buys clothes only for one day don’t need apartments for them and the up time of his life using is near 100%.

I need one month to learn the most of profession and then I need a month of job exactly according this profession, and then I need a month study to another profession and a month to work according this profession.
And so on, so on, so on.
Of course the time quantum of studding and working can be not a month but a year – for good engineer to become good surgeon for example, but the man have to be sure that he practically has worked according profession he has got.

Today’s student listens many different courses for a half a year or even a year and only than he has to go throw examinations for all of them.
Why not to give him 40 lectures and seminars for one course, give him examination and go to the other course.
In this case a student fills that every two weeks he get the complete course of knowledge.
Professor is responsible for results of his students not every year, but every two weeks.
It is much more responsible and effective education system from the side of students and from their professors’ side.

In my New World we can pay to the man almost every really money he wants with just one condition – he has use this money with up time efficiency not less than 96%.

There is the conception of expansive universe and my global social world will be the world of expansive aristocratic elite of all world people.

There is a main difference between elite and other people. Elite spends 99% of their money for buying only things he can sale easy and for services and for different investigations. Other people spend 80% of money on absolutely useless things with up time of using less than 5% - car, house, clothes, perfume for women, bad medical and education services, percents of their credits and taxes.
 
Last edited:
If that much of your meal is inedible, you may want to use some of the next 26 weeks to learn how to cook.

You have to understand first the great potential of my ideas.
Than you have using your native English to make them the most attractive in English speaking world.

Look!
If you have a woman you live with – you have to be in love with her all days when it is possible.
And the same with all others aspects of our life.
It means to live with 100% efficiency.
But we live with 5% efficiency in every impotent life aspect.

NeoShabat will surely bring near 100% efficiency in every impotent life aspect, first in free stages of human life and than in job stages too.


It is interesting that in Russian the word “work” translated “rabota”. The root of this word – “rab” translated a slave.
This word in Hebrew means “avoda”. The root “avd” – “eved” translated a slave.

I can’t give to the people freedom to all their today’s slave life, but I can give them freedom to more than a half of their life in symmetrical lifestyle.
 
You have to understand first the great potential of my ideas.

I think you're underestimating your 'audience' (well, you could have correspondents... but you don't respond)

Anyhoo...

"Great potential" as in a bloody enormous, god-awful mess... yep, understood
 
Please explain WHY you, without providing ANY supporting data, expect anyone on a critical thinking forum to accept your proposal of a (seemingly arbitrary) 50/50 (bi-polar?) split as somehow feasible and/or desirable
This chapter of my book will prove you that symmetrical lifestyle is an optimal one for all human beings' history.
Sorry that I put it in your forum.


A comparison between the optimal lifestyle and others on either side of it

Let us see in what way the “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” relates to the existing or theoretically possible work and free time systems.
The main time unit that is used in almost every society is the one-week time period. Let us also divide this time into all its possible combinations of working and free stages including the one-week “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” variant. Let us also add to the one-week time unit all others used in the complete “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” (two or four weeks, one, two, four or six months, one or two years) and divide them in the same way.
In this way we will obtain a symmetric construction system of the different lifestyles. Some of them really exist while the others are theoretically possible.
The Differently balanced working and free day system table helps to see all of them in relative places. (See page 103)
In the lower part of the table (1L to 4L) the system is composed mainly of working days. The more distant the system remains from the middle the greater the part composed of working days and right at the bottom (4L) a total working lifestyle remains.
In the upper part of the table (1U to 4U) the system is composed mainly of free time. The more distant the system remains from the middle the greater the part that is composed of free days and right at the top (4U) a totally work-free lifestyle remains.
The symmetric axis of the table is the complete “FJT-FFT SYSTEM”.
Every lifestyle in the top section of the table has a corresponding, symmetrically opposite one in the lower half of the table. With the exception of the “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” every one of these lifestyles exists today and is used in a time-unit of one week. Work with almost no free days (4L) is followed by many workaholics, business owners and some immigrants in developed countries. Work with one or two free days per week (3L and 2L) is followed by most working people today being the traditional lifestyle.
Three vacation days in a week (1L) is followed by people who for various reasons cannot work a full week, for example, women with small children and people who have retired, etc. Work for one, two or three days a week (3U, 2U and 1U) is followed by some people who have retired, women with small children and some disabled persons.
Other variants of separating free time from working time stages in various units of time occur only in the theoretical and logical “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” which is not in use today.
This table shows very clearly that the symmetrical variants between the upper and lower sections of the table give the same spiritual and intellectual comfort levels and the same frustration levels from losses.
So the point of view that the more free time is given to people with the same material provision levels the more harmonious and active will be their sense of spiritual and intellectual life is not correct. When a person has too much free time the frustrations and danger levels will be the same as when they have too much work time.
The table shows two directions of the lifestyle steps development, from the top and the bottom to the middle. Every step taken from the top or the bottom moving towards the middle significantly improves the man’s quality of life. For example, if a retired or disabled person who is frustrated with not having work gets 1 or 2 working days per week he will be very happy as it will have a great impact on his quality of life. An equally positive input will occur when a person changes from working every day of the week to having a 1- or 2-day weekend.
The middle part of the table, the “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” (M), is the meeting or intersection point of the two theoretical/practical development lines, the work-dominated and the freedom-dominated lifestyles.




























THE DIFFERENTLY BALANCED JOB AND FREE DAY SISTEM TABLE

Total free time with no work Very soon brings to most people the loss of spiritual and intellectual comfort and there is a very big danger of losing the main professional abilities and becoming depressed. 4U
Work for 1 out of 7 time units Returns minimal spiritual and intellectual comfort to most people because it gives a minimal professional rehabilitation and it is a major improvement as compared to the 4U life style but a small risk remains of losing it. 3U
Work for 2 out of 7 time units Gives satisfactory spiritual and intellectual comfort and the significant positive effect, compared to the 3U life style. The big danger is not completely using professional abilities. 2U
Work for 3 out of 7 time units Gives good spiritual and intellectual comfort, and more positive effect, compared to the 2U life style. There is only a slight danger of not completely using professional abilities. 1U
Work and vacation for equal time units — the “FJT –FFT SYSTEM” Maximal spiritual and intellectual comfort. No danger of depression brought about by loss of professional abilities. M
Vacation for 3 out of 7 time units Gives good spiritual and intellectual comfort and has a more positive effect, compare the 2L life style. There is only a slight danger of not completely using the ability to make use of free time. 1L
Vacation for 2 out of 7 time units Gives satisfactory spiritual and intellectual comfort and has a significant positive effect as compared to the 3L life style. The big danger is of not completely using the abilities to live in ones free time. 2L
Vacation for 1 out of 7 time units Gives minimal spiritual and intellectual comfort and has a huge positive effect as compared to the 4L life style. There is a danger of the complete loss of ability to live in ones free time. 3L
A total work regime. Gives only physiology comfort, without intellectual and spirit one. The big danger of the complete losses the abilities to live in ones free time and becomes depressed as a result. 4L
So we can view the “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” as the optimal lifestyle development variant with an equal number of days in the person’s work and free stages. It is possible to achieve a maximum qualitative balance between work and free time stages for a person and for the society. If the balance is weighted in either of the two directions the changes in quantity of job time or free time will bring about spiritual and intellectual comfort problems or even frustrations to most people.
Many thousands of years ago the ancient Jewish intellectual-spiritual elite constructed a very harmonic lifestyle variant of free time and job time in a proportion of almost 50/50 and still use it today. Consciously or not they observed the law of equal balance between the quantity of working and free days.
The “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” will bring about a modern law observing equal and symmetric balance between the number of job and free days as the most optimal and effective lifestyle for most people.
Living in the 4U or 4L lifestyles, having either too much time or too much work will destroy a person’s ability to live in the contra stage. Most people of the 3L and 2L lifestyles prefer their free stage to their job stage whereas the opposite is true for those in the 3U and 2U lifestyles who prefer their job stages to their free stages. Living in the 1L or 1U systems brings about a situation where there is no significant preference for either of the two stages.
The “FJT-FFT SYSTEM” gives a person a strong belief that he obtains equally intense enjoyment from both his work and free stages.
 
This chapter of my book will prove you that symmetrical lifestyle is an optimal one for all human beings' history.

I'm afraid that all it 'proves' is that you have no idea how to document your ideas.

In the absence of clear and concise documentation, it is practically impossible to gauge whether or not you have done any research

I suspect that I'm not alone in thinking that you're talking out of your arse
 
My base profession is designer of mechanical handling machines.
I was a project manager in the Soviet Union.
I had no one of my machines that was not realized in metal.

In Israel I was a repair mechanic in American High Tech enterprise - Vishey.
The demanding up time in high tech industry is 96%.
Up time in my part was 98%!
I had 150 units of different modern equipment.
Every hour when the unit not works cost $ 1000.
It means that in every 100 hours of my working shift I gave $300000 of economy compare the middle employee.
I worked about 180 hours in a month.
So for a year I gave economy 180*12*300000/100=$6480000.

The society I have designed has “up time” of lifestyle efficiency near 100% almost in every lifestyle point.

I want to give some simple examples.
If you have your own car you use it in the middle not more than an hour a day, but if you get a taxi or a rent car for definite goal you use it with efficiency near 100%.
wrong. I live in the country. The taxi or rental car must travel further to get to me than it will when I use it. The car not being used at times is also benefiting from not being used. My cars last for many years, and I maintain them myself. Your economy might work in your world, but mine works in mine. I do not want yours.
If you have your meal in restaurant you usually eat near 100% of it but if you make shopping you don’t eat even 70% of meal.
30% of your meal becomes garbage.
wrong again. The restaurant throws away the garbage where you don't see it. Restaurants generate great amounts of waste, both from the preparation garbage and the uneaten portions of meals unfinished. Restaurants cannot reuse leftovers. I can. Maybe you waste the food you cook, but others do not.
If you live in your own house or in the rent flat you almost 60% of your time are not their, and most of other 40% of time when you are their you simply sleep.
It is much clever to live in sleeping hotel and pay for those 8 hours – you sleep there.
Some of us do more than sleep in our homes. Not all of us want to be guests all our lives.
You learned a great number of professional subjects in your life and went throw hard examinations, but you use not more than 2-3% of those subjects.
Maybe you learned too many and use too little of each. Are you so sure that's the case for all of us?
I need one more apartment only for clothes and perfume of my wife.
And the person who uses steeliest and buys clothes only for one day don’t need apartments for them and the up time of his life using is near 100%.
Sorry, I only read English (well, and a little French and Latin, but don't count that here), so that paragraph is lost on me.
I need one month to learn the most of profession and then I need a month of job exactly according this profession, and then I need a month study to another profession and a month to work according this profession.
And so on, so on, so on.
Of course the time quantum of studding and working can be not a month but a year – for good engineer to become good surgeon for example, but the man have to be sure that he practically has worked according profession he has got.
I do not know what planet you are from if you think an engineer can become a good surgeon in a year, but I am certainly glad that you live far away and your plan will never bear fruit. Has it never occurred to you (I will defer to six 7's, and omit the word "think" in this context) that some people do what they do because they like it? Not everyone wants to do all these different things.
Today’s student listens many different courses for a half a year or even a year and only than he has to go throw examinations for all of them.
Why not to give him 40 lectures and seminars for one course, give him examination and go to the other course.
In this case a student fills that every two weeks he get the complete course of knowledge.
Professor is responsible for results of his students not every year, but every two weeks.
It is much more responsible and effective education system from the side of students and from their professors’ side.

In my New World we can pay to the man almost every really money he wants with just one condition – he has use this money with up time efficiency not less than 96%.

There is the conception of expansive universe and my global social world will be the world of expansive aristocratic elite of all world people.

There is a main difference between elite and other people. Elite spends 99% of their money for buying only things he can sale easy and for services and for different investigations. Other people spend 80% of money on absolutely useless things with up time of using less than 5% - car, house, clothes, perfume for women, bad medical and education services, percents of their credits and taxes.
Well, I have to go, can't comment on all the rest. Let's just say that I don't think you've "thought" very hard about the economic consequences of your plan.
 
I'm afraid that all it 'proves' is that you have no idea how to document your ideas.

In the absence of clear and concise documentation, it is practically impossible to gauge whether or not you have done any research

I suspect that I'm not alone in thinking that you're talking out of your arse

Unfortunately you can’t see the table, that proves the optimal point of symmetrical lifestyle.
Give me your e- mail and I will sent you my book.

Your economy might work in your world, but mine works in mine. I do not want yours.
In my world every office, enterprise, equipment, car works 24 hours a day and 364 days a year.
Almost all things you buy you can sale every day.
If any thing looses ability to be sale it have to be destroy and we have make something useful from it that we can sale for good prise.
In near future you will order the auto – robot and it will bring you in every point you want, and it will have up time of using more than taxi in Manhattan today.

If all people in your country will accept my ideology you will use taxi as in today’s Manhattan now.

Some of us do more than sleep in our homes. Not all of us want to be guests all our lives.
In symmetrical life style you will have a possibility to live on your own home for 26 weeks a year.
You will use it with up time near 100% as creative freelancer that works at home.

In job weeks time you will live in sleeping hotels not more than half a day and other half-day in your room will be the other person.
Your home will be fully used in the time of your absent when you are at your work place.
Nothing will be touched their because only you the owner of your home.
Somebody will use your home in the time of your absent and pay you for it.

some people do what they do because they like it? Not everyone wants to do all these different things.
I like to be the president of USA, but after 8 years I have to go out of my place.
The same rotation have to be in every job place after 26 weeks of work in the most place, but in some cases after 52 and even 108 weeks of work.
In the cases when you have your own business – please work ever you want, but your employees have to get from you 26 free from job weeks a year.

Well, I have to go, can't comment on all the rest. Let's just say that I don't think you've "thought" very hard about the economic consequences of your plan.

In my world a student after an age 21 will not be testified at all.
It is impossible to you to emerge that testifying of full-grown responsible person is unethical thing.
If I have doubt about my professional abilities in some arias I can be testify myself.
 
Unfortunately you can’t see the table, that proves the optimal point of symmetrical lifestyle.
Give me your e- mail and I will sent you my book.

It has been postulated that with an infinite supply of monkeys, an infinite supply of typewriters and an infinite supply of time, a monkey will tap out the complete works of Shakespeare

So, I guess, there is a chance that, one day, you might learn to document your ideas concisely and coherently

If that ever happens, please let me know

I hope you'll appreciate that, until then, I'll aim to ration wisely as much as possible of the 6742 MB of space available in my inbox

:)

In my world a student after an age 21 will not be testified at all.
It is impossible to you to emerge that testifying of full-grown responsible person is unethical thing.
If I have doubt about my professional abilities in some arias I can be testify myself.

I think I just heard my inbox sigh in relief
 
If I have doubt about my professional abilities in some arias I can be testify myself.

I have no doubt at my lack of ability in any arias. But then professional opera singers are also highly trained and talented.
I suggest you try these

What about your non-professional linguistic ability?
 
Last edited:
What about your non-professional linguistic ability?

Almost every one from you – natively speaking English high skilled people can the corrector and editor of my English texts.
Just one condition – my editor has to believe that my ideas are the greatest ideas in the world.
 
Just one condition – my editor has to believe that my ideas are the greatest ideas in the world.
I think you'll find that anyone that meets that condition will be incapable of writing their own name in anything other than crayon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom