Questions Truthers can't answer

Galileo said:
Hoffman's paper is far superior than that of Blanchard's and you know it.
Click to expand...

Can you refute my critique of Hoffman?

I prove that Hoffman cherrypicks data and makes up false information. His paper is not "superior" to a paper written by a monkey with a typewriter.
 
We're talking about the same Jim Hoffman who thinks 2.2 kilotons minimum TNT equivalent was detonated or ignited in each WTC Tower, right?

How again is this superior to Brent Blanchard's work?

I especially invite anyone who isn't pretending to be the reincarnated spectre of a 16th century scientist to respond.
 
R.Mackey said:
We're talking about the same Jim Hoffman who thinks 2.2 kilotons minimum TNT equivalent was detonated or ignited in each WTC Tower, right?

How again is this superior to Brent Blanchard's work?

I especially invite anyone who isn't pretending to be the reincarnated spectre of a 16th century scientist to respond.
Click to expand...

Personally, I see our Galileo as more fifteenth century-ish-- more of a Joan of Arc type figure (Joan of Archetype).

By the way, what's wrong with thinking 2.2 ktons of TNT equivalent was in each tower?
 
IIRC, not one truther has answered this question:
Why is there not one raw audio recording of the explosive sequence of the supposed demolition charges?

There is a recording of the crashes, the rumble of the collapses, even an explosion that has no source sometime between when the towers collapsed and WTC 7 collapsed. However, there is nothing, save the manufactured sounds in Ms. Clunkity-Clunks 9/11 Mysteries fake-umentary.
 
johnny karate said:
No, the FBI is an investigative body. Scotland Yard is an investigative body. These, and organizations like them, are institutions that existed long before the events of 9/11 for the sole purpose of investigating.

You rattled off the names of websites that are merely a collection of impotent kooks who share your unsubstantiated delusions. These organizations are hardly investigative bodies. They're hardly even organizations. Next you'll be claiming Prison Planet is a MSM outlet.

Please try again:

Why has not a single law enforcement agency, investigative body, or MSM outlet on the planet discerned and/or revealed the Truth behind the events of 9/11?
Click to expand...

Bump #3 for Galileo.
 
Galileo said:
Appoint honest people to head the CIA, FBI, and U.S. military, then order the heads of these departments to produce the documents that prove 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...

Duly noted, assumption of complicity alleged without evidence.

Hey G, what standard of measure will determine the "honesty" of these appointments? Could this be done without assuming dishonesty through assumptions?

Could you start the proceedings without the assumption of guilt and start from innocent until proven guilty?
 
A-Train said:
Personally, I see our Galileo as more fifteenth century-ish-- more of a Joan of Arc type figure (Joan of Archetype).

By the way, what's wrong with thinking 2.2 ktons of TNT equivalent was in each tower?
Click to expand...

LOTS!! How did it get there and how was it "wired up" without anyone noticing?
I'm sure you're the source expert on that one.:rolleyes:
 
A-Train said:
By the way, what's wrong with thinking 2.2 ktons of TNT equivalent was in each tower?
Click to expand...

It's totally ridiculous, that's what.



This is Operation Sailor Hat. 500 tons of TNT. Hoffman's idiotic calculations -- based on his indefensible insistence that the smoke cloud could only grow through thermal expansion, not mixing -- require five times this amount of explosives. Or thermite. Makes no difference; we're talking about an energy release in a matter of a few seconds, so replace the shockwave with a flare brighter than a thousand suns.

Five times this. In downtown Manhattan.

With a million people and a thousand TV cameras watching.

Twice.

I don't know which is stupider, this hypothesis, or the space beams.
 
Galileo said:
You have trouble following basic logic.

I never said the media was part of the coverup. I made a conditional statement based on what abenja1 posted:

"Originally Posted by abenja1
If the media was involved in the coverup of 9/11... "
Click to expand...

????

I posed this question: "If the media was involved in the coverup of 9/11 why are they critical of Bush and have given coverage to the 9/11 truth movement?"

Now as a truther you know the many truthers implicate the media in the coverup (ex: Alex Jones, members of prison planet, Morgan Reynolds, WAC).

Then you answered: "to make it look like they are being objective, and not part of the coverup."

Now I'm asking for proof from you, as in that statement, you are implying the media was involved in the coverup.
 
1337m4n said:
Questions Truthers can't answer:

What evidence would it take to get you to admit that you are wrong about 9/11?
Click to expand...

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..........
 
Galileo said:
Appoint honest people to head the CIA, FBI, and U.S. military, then order the heads of these departments to produce the documents that prove 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...

Really?

Honest people just like you ?

Oh you honest person what would you do if you suddenly got your wish? you, as an honest person is suddenly in charge, so what now?

What about the war on terror? The threat of international terrorism? Al Qaeda, do you declare they are make belief, shake hands and suddenly there is world peace? Hey how about you should pay these guys compensation because of all the trouble you have caused them?

So, what do you do?

Hypothetical, I know, but hey lets hear what you, as the only honest person on the planet would do to the resolve the worlds problems, which of course everybody else is blissfully unaware of and only you can see.

Foreign policy? Got any?
Domestic policy? Got any?
Your ideal world? Any idea?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom