• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JEROME - Black holes do not exist

I see Jerome is back:
I ask for the the 10th? time
So the remaing question is what is his evidence for the statement that gravity is not strong enough?

For someone who demands evidence in other threads you are strangely silent on this.
 
Terry said:
What kind of evidence would you find acceptable?
Click to expand...

This is the biggest BS question presented on these forms.


Weak, weak, weak.


When one can not defend their position, or answer a question, they ask what do I have to do to convince you I am right.


Do you get a play book, or just crib note this?

:dl:
:irule:13:
 
Oh come now. People have proposed plenty of things as evidence and you've pooh-poohed them all. It seems a legitimate question at this stage.
 
JEROME DA GNOME said:
What is the evidence that it is strong enough?


...because the planets do orbit is not valid. There are many theories that could fulfill this fact.
Click to expand...
Care to list these theories, and how they wouldn't produce other observable phenomena?
 
wollery said:
Care to list these theories, and how they wouldn't produce other observable phenomena?
Click to expand...

How about: GODDIDIT.


Now, what evidence would make you believe this?




Can you guys not see how silly the game you are playing is?

You seem to think that your arguments are founded in logic, yet they are nothing more that a chorus of believers shouting down anything unapproved by the group.



:gnome:
 
God "making" things behave in a way that appears completely naturalistic would be indistinguishable from a purely naturalistic explanation, sure. But if it is indistinguishable from the case where it is happening naturalisticly, what need is there for God? How does that get us any further forward? Unless one day he decides to stop, and everything goes to hell (literally?). That would be evidence.
 
JEROME DA GNOME said:
...because the planets do orbit is not valid. There are many theories that could fulfill this fact.
Click to expand...

Mercury's orbit matches general relativity. It does not match Newtonian gravity. So no, there aren't "many theories" which will work. General relativity is by far the most accurate theory we have of gravity, as determined by multiple experimental tests. It is a nonlinear theory, and because of that, gravitational forces can diverge even for finite mass (ie, black holes should exist). Do you think general relativity is wrong?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom