Merged Barry Jennings Says There Were Dead People in WTC 7!!!!

[Papermache]

I have a life, a job and a lot of other things going on to be able to sit on jref and respond to every taunt some anonymous poster throws at me.

Hey, genius - unless your name really is RedIbis, you're also some anonymous poster. Feel free to ignore my "taunt."

 

[RedIbis]

Hey, genius - unless your name really is RedIbis, you're also some anonymous poster. .

Which is why I don't bait and taunt posters, follow them around from thread to thread and ask the same questions over and over again.

Waiting around for someone to reply to your posts has to be one of the more stupid things I"ve seen around here.

 

[DavidJames]

Which is why I don't bait and taunt posters..

Instead you accuse (implicitly) of the U.S. govt and other innocent people of complicity in the murder of 3000 people on 9/11. And to top it off, you do nothing about it, except anonymously post on an Internet forum.

But no Red, you don't taunt posters.

Sorry, back to ignoring delusional trolls.

 

[RedIbis]

Instead you accuse (implicitly) of the U.S. govt and other innocent people of complicity in the murder of 3000 people on 9/11. And to top it off, you do nothing about it, except anonymously post on an Internet forum.

But no Red, you don't taunt posters.

Sorry, back to ignoring delusional trolls.

Quote. Where have I accused anyone of murder?

 

[BenBurch]

I am almost the only non-anonymous poster here...

 

[chillzero]

Stop it everyone. Let's get back to topic, please.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

 

[funk de fino]

I have a life, a job and a lot of other things going on to be able to sit on jref and respond to every taunt some anonymous poster throws at me.

I have a job, a life and a lot of other things going on. Those things do not include making false claims and avoiding tricky questions that I cannot answer.

If you are big enough to make a claim or make a statement then you should answer a question that arises due to your claim.

You have posted three times now and still not answered the posts directed at you. We know why red.

PS How do you know its not my real name?

 

[BenBurch]

Stop it everyone. Let's get back to topic, please.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

I'm not really entirely sure what the topic IS other than twoofers lying yet again by reporting unreliable recollections that have been heavily edited and then had inferences drawn from that that don't even jibe with those edited texts?

 

[Norseman]

Actually, I do know what Hess and Jennings meant because I listened to them. I am sure just about everyone has heard the Jennings interview. However, this Hess audio interview is what I found about a month ago. In it he stated exactly why they descended WTC7, and that was because of the lights going out in the building due to the power failure.

This is what I wanted you to hear in my link.

However, just now I rechecked that link and it has become broken. This is unfortunate. This short interview, the only one I ever ran across by Hess, is now gone due to the vagaries of the internet. A bit frustrating, but on further reflection not really, for I now realize that even if you had heard Hess say these illuminating words, you no doubt would say he is only covering for Giuliani (whom he now works with at Giuliani Partners) and other "conspirators".

The Interview with Mr. Hess can also be heard in this WTC 7 truther video. It is at 6:20:

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

Last year there was blogger at 911Blogger.com that had obtained a copy of the live coverage from UPN 9 News that contained the interview with Hess. The blogger claimed initially that the interview took place at 11:34. But in the comments section the blogger honestly enough had to backtrack and conclude that the interview began just before 11:59 instead, after a closer look at the tape:

http://911blogger.com/node/10425

The blog entry also contains a transcript of the interview.

I am quiet certain that it was this interview that Galileo was referring to here:

Then he was rescued, went a half mile from WTC 7, and did TV interview at 11:34 A.M.

 

[chillzero]

I'm not really entirely sure what the topic IS other than twoofers lying yet again by reporting unreliable recollections that have been heavily edited and then had inferences drawn from that that don't even jibe with those edited texts?

Well, yes... but the topic is not Red's home habits.

 

[Galileo]

Yes, it's ridiculous, as has been shown numerous times before. I'm out of this thread, as I said above, but here is a link to the oral history account of EMS Division Chief John Peruggia that dispels the "7WTC was empty at 0903" nonsense rather soundly.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110160.PDF

Bye!

Jennings never says the WTC 7 is empty at 9:03. First of all, Jennings and Hess are still in WTC 7 at that time, so its not empty.

Jennings and Hess were just in the lobby minutes before at about 8:50. Why would Jennings think WTC 7 occupied at 8:50, but not at 9:03?

Jennings says the OEC is empty at 9:03, except for Hess and Jennings.

Your word games are wearing thin on us all.

 

[~enigma~]

Jennings never says the WTC 7 is empty at 9:03. First of all, Jennings and Hess are still in WTC 7 at that time, so its not empty.

Jennings and Hess were just in the lobby minutes before at about 8:50. Why would Jennings think WTC 7 occupied at 8:50, but not at 9:03?

Jennings says the OEC is empty at 9:03, except for Hess and Jennings.

Your word games are wearing thin on us all.

Do you know what reality is or is the entire bowel movement detached from reality?

 

[boloboffin]

Jennings never says the WTC 7 is empty at 9:03. First of all, Jennings and Hess are still in WTC 7 at that time, so its not empty.

Jennings and Hess were just in the lobby minutes before at about 8:50. Why would Jennings think WTC 7 occupied at 8:50, but not at 9:03?

Jennings says the OEC is empty at 9:03, except for Hess and Jennings.

Your word games are wearing thin on us all.

Yes, well, she was responding to me, and I quite clearly said that it was the OEM that was deserted according to Jennings when the second plane hit the South Tower...

...and that makes no sense at all.

Please stop playing "skip the real points" and concentrate on reality.

 

[Galileo]

Didn't ask for the book. Did you misunderstand my post or can't you read? I clearly asked for the video. unless you provide that here, you are just blowing hot air and repeating hearsay.

You don't get it. I'm not here trying to convince you of anything. I don't care what you believe, nor does what you believe have any benefit to me or my family. You have already decided what happened, no matter how many witnesses and facts contradict your vision of reality.

I'm here to see if there are any halfway decent arguments against what Barry Jennings and Mike Hess have said. I've already read Griffin's new book, its not my problem if you haven't.

So far, not one argument here against Jennings or Hess has any validity. I will be on the radio this Friday, 5-6 central on Genesis with Kevin Barrett, discussing this, and I wanted to be prepared for my interview.

 

[Galileo]

That's it? You base your timeline on a single point of data?

Seriously?

Wow...

That's all you got? Wow, you're a smart guy!

 

[~enigma~]

You don't get it. I'm not here trying to convince you of anything. I don't care what you believe, nor does what you believe have any benefit to me or my family. You have already decided what happened, no matter how many witnesses and facts contradict your vision of reality.

My version? You have went off the deep end and you are a major embarrassment to your screenname.

I'm here to see if there are any halfway decent arguments against what Barry Jennings and Mike Hess have said.

And if your not seeing them it isn't anyones fault but your own.

I've already read Griffin's new book, its not my problem if you haven't.

Yes we know you have read his book and are part of the reason he can afford a new boat...are you proud of yourself? Now please tell me why I would want to read anything written by a liar, fraud and total idiot and then explain why "truth" comes at a price.

So far, not one argument here against Jennings or Hess has any validity

Talk about some major confirmation bias....

I will be on the radio this Friday, 5-6 central on Genesis with Kevin Barrett, discussing this, and I wanted to be prepared for my interview.

Be careful, that moron threatens everyone media that disagrees with him. That means if you think the hijackers were real and not patsies, you think they are all dead (the hijackers), you think a sect of islam exists that can be termed radical, etc. BTW, I also was told (but I never tried to verify) that Barrett is a holocaust denier. If that is true, why are you supporting him?

 

[chillzero]

That's all you got?

It's what you said.

 

[Galileo]

Yes, well, she was responding to me, and I quite clearly said that it was the OEM that was deserted according to Jennings when the second plane hit the South Tower...

...and that makes no sense at all.

Please stop playing "skip the real points" and concentrate on reality.

Do you have an eyewitness who saw people in the OEMEOC at 9:03?

 

[~enigma~]

Do you have an eyewitness who saw people in the OEMEOC at 9:03?

Do you have a witness that was in the OEM at 9:03 and prove that they were there. That means show corroboration to use a word you idiots in the bowel movement love.

 

[Galileo]

It's what you said.

That's not all I said.