• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Barry Jennings Says There Were Dead People in WTC 7!!!!

Jennings was in a deserted OEM when the second plane hit?

I can't believe anyone thinks that actually makes sense. The staff didn't activate the OEM until after the first plane hit. When the second plane hits, the OEM requests the FAA to provide air security over New York. They were still there.

Yes, it's ridiculous, as has been shown numerous times before. I'm out of this thread, as I said above, but here is a link to the oral history account of EMS Division Chief John Peruggia that dispels the "7WTC was empty at 0903" nonsense rather soundly.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110160.PDF

Bye! :)
 
What about the other two with Jennings. Hess and the security guard? Have any of the truthers tried to get in touch with them?
 
SO am I to believe that this man, Mr. Jennings, is sitting on evidence that people died in WTC7 prior to its collapse, and hence is sitting on evidence that members of the FDNY had to cover this up, as they cleared the building and had everyone move away from it, yet no dead bodies, no deaths reported from the same.

So am I to believe that Bermas and Jones are sitting on this evidence, waiting for the release of what the twoofers will tout as "The next undebunkable video", rather then bring this evidence to a prosecutor???

Disgusting people...not fit to be americans (Bermas and Jones that is).

TAM:)
 
SO am I to believe that this man, Mr. Jennings, is sitting on evidence that people died in WTC7 prior to its collapse, and hence is sitting on evidence that members of the FDNY had to cover this up, as they cleared the building and had everyone move away from it, yet no dead bodies, no deaths reported from the same.

So am I to believe that Bermas and Jones are sitting on this evidence, waiting for the release of what the twoofers will tout as "The next undebunkable video", rather then bring this evidence to a prosecutor???

Disgusting people...not fit to be americans (Bermas and Jones that is).

TAM:)
Undebunkable?! From what I have seen over on 9/11 Blogger and LCF I predict that this video will not make the impact AJ and Bermass are hoping for.
 
Because Griffin measured the distance from where the interview was to WTC 7.

Read his book, its not online. Real scholars do not spend 100% of their time on the Internet.

You've got nothing.




Griffin is a fraud and a liar. He does no research.
 
yes, but that hasn't stopped the truthers from coming here every so many months (although they have been quiet on this front as of late) claiming that "Video X" is the latest video telling the "truth" and is "undebunkable".

TAM:)
 
if "real" scholars do not spend 100% of their time on line, then there are officially ZERO "real" scholars in the truth movement.

TAM:)
 
Griffin is a fraud and a liar. He does no research.
What i want to know is why this guy thinks we spend 100% of our time on the internet? Guess he thinks we are all retired or independently wealthy. Even then we need breaks to eat and go to the bathroom and sleep once in a while. That's why I think truthers are wastes of oxygen. They can't say anything without gross exaggeration.
 
quicknthedead said:
He was confused more than once that day. He also said the "explosion" happened on the 6th floor, but in the interviews both he and Hess said "it" happened at the 8th floor. This man was clearly shook up that day, which is understandable.

Nevertheless, we can not get away from the fact that Hess said they decided to start down in the dark after the power went out...i.e., this was their reason for descending. How could someone make that up, much less forget it?

If it gets dark because the power goes out, anyone with half a mind would come to the conclusion that, "Perhaps this might be a good time to go down these 23 floors..." (especially on 9/11). We can also be confident in knowing that person would never, ever forget this reason why he decided to make the descent.


You know exactly what he meant and so does Jennings. You're not fooling anyone.

Actually, I do know what Hess and Jennings meant because I listened to them. I am sure just about everyone has heard the Jennings interview. However, this Hess audio interview is what I found about a month ago. In it he stated exactly why they descended WTC7, and that was because of the lights going out in the building due to the power failure.

This is what I wanted you to hear in my link.

However, just now I rechecked that link and it has become broken. This is unfortunate. This short interview, the only one I ever ran across by Hess, is now gone due to the vagaries of the internet. A bit frustrating, but on further reflection not really, for I now realize that even if you had heard Hess say these illuminating words, you no doubt would say he is only covering for Giuliani (whom he now works with at Giuliani Partners) and other "conspirators".

Am I right? Well, no matter. The interview is gone (I tried to relocate it on the net now, but after an hour of hunting I gave up). Nonetheless, I heard it, I know what I heard, and I have told you the truth.

It might surprise you but I used to be a 9/11 Truther until about a month and a half ago, which was when I realized WTC7 could not have been a CD; and this had nothing whatsoever to do with Barry Jennings.

Adios
quicknthedead
 
Every narrative I have read has Rudy quitting the OEM after the police helicopters noticed that the south tower had started to show signs of imminent collapse. Thus, that he found the OEM deserted puts Jennings on the building long after the second strike, thus the noise that he takes to have been the second strike would have to have been the collapse of the south tower. Or has someone a link to evidence that Jennings describes seeing the second strike?
 
No, the interview I've seen, Jennings says that it "would have to be" the second plane strike when he was in the deserted OEM. He's not basing that on actual experience. He's reasoning it out. The trouble is, he's off on his timing.
 
Because Griffin measured the distance from where the interview was to WTC 7.

Read his book, its not online.


This doesn't surprise me at all. Of course the book isn't online if it was Dr Griffin couldn't make any money off of 9/11. And that is much more important than the truth isn't it?
 
This could also be why he described his surroundings as "pitch black" I assume. It would be pretty hard to black out an entire building in daylight, even if the power was out.

I know from numerous personal experiences that it takes a team of four or five lighting guys about two to three hours to black out half a normal one-floor residential house...

Oh wait... different sort of blacking out...

As you were.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom