• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

TAM Forum Party Net-A-Thon

Of course, we should be careful not to publicise this at TAM as 'the TAM 6 party' on the bulletin board, because if 800 people turn up, we're screwed.

It's always been a sort of forum-plus-special-guests event, I suppose. It would be a disaster if it were perceived as any sort of official TAM6 party. There simply isn't the resource for that.

I just like to throw flies in renaming ointments. But it's a valid point I think. For practical purposes it's probably sensible to call it the Forum Party for this year, maybe? Or the Party Formerly Known as the Forum Party But Not Actually A Public Event But More A Sort of Internet Community Thing.

I dunno. Not that the room number will be on the bulletin board anyway, it never has been. Rebecca always gives it out individually, which is a sensible tactic.

Those are all valid points, and some were raised last time, too. And we definitely need to come up with some solution to who can attend, at some point.

As I see it, there are two models:

Free-for-all
It's a possibility that 800 people will show up, of course, but probably not going to happen. Not everyone comes to the Reception either. However, it doesn't really matter if it is 800 or 10 more than the premises can accommodate. The result is the same: Some get in, some are left out. Some of those left out will be forumites - what to do about them? Do we throw out non-forumites so forumites can get in? Will it be just too bad for those forumites who come late? That's not good, since people are going to Penn & Teller on the same night as the party. And, if there is room for all forumites and some non-forumites, which of the non-forumites do we let in? First come, first served? Or special favors, by all forumites - or some forumites, but not others?

A free-for-all would also be a somewhat similar event to the Reception - only longer. So why come to one and not the other? Some will think that.

Only forumites-plus-special-guests
Who are the special guests? If it is the speakers, then better call it Forumites-plus-speakers. If some people can also invite their own special guests outside the speakers' group, who will those be? Chosen by what criteria? We're going to have favorites and special favors all over the place. If I can invite people, why can't Teek?

This would also require gate control: People would be required to wear something that identify them as forumites. That means a checklist at the door. But how will we identify those who have signed up, but haven't posted? Anyone can claim they are PosterX. Do we sign up in advance, so the list of attendees are settled before the party starts? Do we have to have a certain minimum number of posts?

Or, of course, we could just bank on only forumites turning up. But what do we tell those who are interested, but not on the forum? Do we let them in? That's one heck of a way to welcome people - you get to party! Or is it: "Sorry, it's for forumites only!" Gee, welcome!

Giving the room number individually is sensible, if you want to get a specific group to attend, but that's a problem even today: What about those who are not in the vicinity of Rebecca? She could leave the number at the Forum table when she got it, of course - that would solve that problem.

.

Since we have a Forum table this year, lots of non-forumites will hear about the forum, and hopefully will sign up. That will become a problem at the next TAM, since more people will be included in the forumites-plus-special-guests group. And if we are serious about attracting people to the forum, we'd better prepare for every TAM attendee also being a forumite. So the second group will migrate into becoming the first.


Yes, there are many things to consider. But we should decide on what to do in advance, in order to anticipate and hence prevent problems.
 
Thanks, Ottle! See you at TAM, Rebecca!

I was the person who booked another suite at the hotel, just in case Rebecca decided not to come. I did this for no other reason than as a backup in case she changed her plans. Now that the plans are the original plans with no plan to change the plans, the backup suite is no longer in the plan and shall be canceled.

~~ Paul
 
Last edited:
With regards to the Party That Shall Not Be Named...

I brought this point up in another thread related to the Cigars, Crack and Rainbows party that's also happening over at Caesars, but it seems worthwhile to raise it here as well. Virtually all of the larger hotels require you show a cardkey before going up in the elevators, so has anyone thought of a method to get people to the party? Is it possible for one key-carrying person to stand by the guard station and wave people through, all with the full OK of said guard?

Or should we resort to a more reasonable approach, such as lowering a rope ladder from the balcony?
 
Claus, let's just let Rebecca do what she's always done. It's always been the best non-Event event, and this year will be the same. Over-organising kills a party faster than you can say "form an orderly line".
 
Also, I have now decided to call it the Skepchick-JREF-Skeptical-Cookie-Monster-JREF-Extravaganza With Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters.

Also, it's now called the 'WTF is Teek Wearing This Year? Party'

We could simply call it "The TAM6 Party". That's what it is, after all.

Can we just use its initials? The SJSCMJEwPGGBWTFiTWTHP-TAM6P?

I'm sure that will be much easier for everyone to remember.
 
Claus, let's just let Rebecca do what she's always done. It's always been the best non-Event event, and this year will be the same. Over-organising kills a party faster than you can say "form an orderly line".

It isn't about over-organising. We aren't talking about how to handle the 32 white dancing tigers borrowed from Siegfried & Roy, or the 72 scantily-clad nymphs performing their version of "War and Peace".

It's about anticipating problems in advance, if we possibly can. Specifically, admission issues.
 
It isn't about over-organising. We aren't talking about how to handle the 32 white dancing tigers borrowed from Siegfried & Roy, or the 72 scantily-clad nymphs performing their version of "War and Peace".

It's about anticipating problems in advance, if we possibly can. Specifically, admission issues.

I'm sure the organisers have everything under control. Too many cooks, and all that :)
 
Ok, I've gotten the 'official' word from Rebecca and she says she always calls it "The Skepchick-sponsored JREF forum party" or "The JREF forum party, sponsored by Skepchick."

So there ya go. Add 'naked' in wherever you like :)
 
Ok, I've gotten the 'official' word from Rebecca and she says she always calls it "The Skepchick-sponsored JREF forum party" or "The JREF forum party, sponsored by Skepchick."

So there ya go. Add 'naked' in wherever you like :)

"The NAKED James Randi Educational Foundation forum party sponsored by Skepchick" - All due respect to Mr. Randi, but would we really want to see that?

"The NAKED Skepchick-sponsored JREF forum party" - that could get Rebecca banned from Caeser's Palace as well. (maybe not, it IS Vegas)
 
Using my incredible psychic powers, I will predict that various skepdudes will be hoping the "Naked" precedes the "Skepchick".

The reasonable observation of human behavior resulting in a rational prediction hardly makes the No ka oi! island queen a psychic. Just one dakine poser, hey bra???
 
Claus, let's just let Rebecca do what she's always done. It's always been the best non-Event event, and this year will be the same. Over-organising kills a party faster than you can say "form an orderly line".

Agreed.

Jesus tap dancing Christ, why does everyone have their panties in such a bunch over this?

It's the Forum Party. It has always been the Forum Party. There is no reason to call it anything else, or worry about who is invited, or whether or not they might confuse it with the "Official TAM Party" Thursday night.

It's the Forum Party. Period. Deal with it.
 
And I have word from a highly placed source that Rebecca is going to steal everyone's money and fill the sauna with whiskey and whores.
 
Agreed.

Jesus tap dancing Christ, why does everyone have their panties in such a bunch over this?

It's the Forum Party. It has always been the Forum Party. There is no reason to call it anything else, or worry about who is invited, or whether or not they might confuse it with the "Official TAM Party" Thursday night.

It's the Forum Party. Period. Deal with it.

You left out "NAKED"...
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom