• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

CIT.....Time to call it a day

I would suggesting debating the issue at the pilots forum as they have a thread specifically for debates.

Will you begin the debate over there?

Debate? Is this what you call debate?

God you are such a loud mouthed, vile, punk b*tch , Rox. I am so tired of your negative know-it-all bullying *********.

Let's get it on, E-Activist.


Quote:
Quote: Oh of course I am only whining. That's all it is. Thanks for pointing that out Roxdog. You want to come and fix my panties for me?​
Um, no. The only person who should be fixing your panties is YOU. Not me. Not Mr. Jones.​

Look at you. Wasting time defending ****. You're an AJ groupie or are you? Or do you just like to argue, because that's your parents taught you. Your attitude seems like you've been abused in your life. Because you certainly lack social skills. Ur just a do-nothing E-activist running around insulting people, flexing online. DOING NOTHING with your wack ass radio show.



Don't you have some skeptics to flex on, tough guy
Let's see what was accomplished today. What did you accomplish today, Rox? Yesterday? the day before?​
Ha...you don't know anything about me. I accomplish things EVERYDAY. All day. Thanks.
1.png

Tying your shoes don't count, homey. Wearing a black t-shirt that says "Investigate 9/11" don't count either. Blowing hot air on a radio show no one listens to don't count either. Posting on forums like it's goddamn hobby don't count either.


How much closer are we to that investigation? Yeah that's what I thought.​
What investigation? WTF are you talkiing about? Yeah, lets get some more CFR members to go over the events of 9/11. That'll fix everything...lol​

See. Absolute confusion. You don't even know what the f---you want or how to get it. You just complain, punk skeptics, run around flexing online acting like a bad ass, being an e-activist.

Me? I am a bad ass. I grabbed the bull by the horns.


FYI, I haven't listened to that man in over a year. I don't care what he does with his career. I don't care about his antics.​
Then STFU already.​

No bitch. You STFU. Especially because you've got nothing to say.



I have the right to voice my opinion in hopes that someone WILL contact AJ about why he hasn't had us on.
But hey let's make another post in the lounge. That oughtta do it.​
My sentiment exactly. I have real, actual reasons to dislike the man....but you don't hearing me whining about them.​



and I don't? I have motherf---ing powderkeg evidence. I've got Jrefers going gaa-gaa over us. Pulling their hair out obsessing over, if not outright ignoring, what we' done
Let me remind you of something. CIT and PFT have actual evidence and eyewitness testimony that can bring actual action.​
Good for you guys. So shut up and bring the "actual action".​

Well STFU and help us.

Just another lazy scared little punk. Waiting for everyone else to do it for you.



you certainly don't have the balls, brains, or fortitude to do what we've done. The least you could do is keep your mouth shut, stay out of the way, or help out.
We don't have firemen who think they heard explosions who are afraid to come forward. We don't have Mormon physics professors with WTC dust with no chain of custody. We don't have alive hijackers who aren't really alive. We don't have opinions. We have hard evidence. Evidence Alex Jones and co. only like to promote on their site when it seems to drive traffic there. They are a f----- disgrace, pure and simple.​
Well, all in all, he's done more than you ever will so if he is a disgrace what does that make you? You've made 9/11 your pet issue and you think your are some sort of oracle on the subject. Hate to burst your bubble, newbie, but you aren't...​

Newbie? **** you. I've spent more time on ACTUALLY researching 9/11 and gaining evidence than you have posting your asanine ******** do-nothing threads and announcements ACCOMPLOSHING near nothing for 9/11 truth.

Bitch, I >am< ONE of THE oracles when it comes to 9/11, especially 9/11 you know-not do nothing.

I don't care about what he has done anymore. That is all out the window when he blatantly only uses RAW evidence to drive traffic to his site instead of treating it like he treated the shills he's had on his show like Karl Schwarz and Lauro Chavez. 2 steps forward and 4 back don't help anyone out.



He gave airtime to f--king shills, won't research **** thoroughly, and uses our evidence for promotion on his site while he steadily ignores having us on to discuss this
Do you realize that Alex Jones (amongst others) is still peddling videos with INCORRECT information contained in it? Information that spawns more misinformation and makes new "truthers" look like idiots because they repeat it. It's ********.​
Right...you and your buddies are all perfect and only you can save us. This thread and your amazing analysis of Mr. Jones is a great start....lol (pimp your video in 5....4.....3.....2.....)​

Yeah and your crack addict habit of talking **** does?

F---you b*tch. Pimp my video? you mean like that piece of **** AJ? How many f--king videos does he have now, you scumbag? Show me where I've "pimped" my video you lying desperate reachy POS. Show me in this thread or any other thread where I've asked people to buy the video.

Motherf---er, we have real jobs. Rob does this **** full time. Did you know that? His job is PFT. His videos are a source of revenue solely to keep PFT and it's aims going. Did you know our video sales helped us obtain some of then new evidence we obtained? Did you know we haven't made ANY "profit" from our videos nor was that the intent? Did ya know that, dum dum?

Did you know that we felt that we knew if we sold videos, the controversy of what we did would grow more than if we didn't?

Of course you didn't. Because you have the brain and the attention span of a teenager on meth.

Right now, we have evidence that can force( you do know what force means right?) an inquiry into who was behind 9/11.



No, but I know, AJ said hijackers are alive and NORAD stood down. It's evidence!!!! And I still people promoting this debunked neutralized garbage. F--king dummies.
I suggest you think twice before you start your **** with me, Rox. Especially when I am right.​
I only had to think once to see what a whiney little worthless newbie you are...You are just as bad as Jones, you are using a contrived petty beef with him to pimp your video.​

Newbie? Oh sorry big bad OG. Didn't know you cornered the market on battling the NWO. You're a clown. Are you listening to yourself?

You support Jones. You don't support Jones. Which is it?


Quote: You are accompishing nothing.​
I put you in your place, E-activist. That, I accomplished.

Aldo Marquis CIT

Is this your idea of debate ?
 
Last edited:
Aldo said:
Let me remind you of something. CIT and PFT have actual evidence and eyewitness testimony that can bring actual action.

We have hard evidence.

....and yet....still nothing.
 
Is Aldo trustworthy?

JFK said:
Yes Craig, you are not a sock. However the "merc" account Aldo created after his suspension today IS a sock..... The same account I suspended 10 minutes after it was created, WITH Aldo's IP address.

JFK said:
I'll be honest with you, Had he not created that sock it would be just a 7 day vacation.
Because he created that sock, his actions are currently under review by all admins.

There have been permament bans for less than what Aldo has done today so I can not make any promises.
Also this is not his first offense here and that will be taken into account.

If it goes well for him ( and I truly hope it does ) he will be able to log on in 7 days.
If not he will receive an email stating that he may not.... at both his email addys.

No one ( who counts ) disputes his research skills, but when he openly attacks another truth member as he has in this thread it only proves he has a serious problem.... and needs help.
( that is a hint.
2.png
)

And no it was not a debate, it was an attack.
 
As interesting and instructive as the above is, cross posting such as this is frowned upon is it not? I am by no means a protector of P4T or the CIT, but perhaps this belongs in another forum?
 
I would suggesting debating the issue at the pilots forum as they have a thread specifically for debates.

Will you begin the debate over there?

I'd be happy to, but the Pilots forum banned me after just one post.

I wasn't attacking them. I wasn't even arguing or debating. I just posted an interesting article on the fire testing of the Twin Towers.

They banned me in one post.

Now Swing. You tell me which forum is more tolerant of dissent.
 
As interesting and instructive as the above is, cross posting such as this is frowned upon is it not? I am by no means a protector of P4T or the CIT, but perhaps this belongs in another forum?

I am getting this thread and the CIT challenge thread confused. the OP of the challenge thread has a link to the "open letter to jref" Where they beg JREF to open an account to both Craig and Aldo. My post above shows that on other boards Aldo is not trustworthy. Perhaps the above post belongs in the Challenge thread.
 
I am getting this thread and the CIT challenge thread confused. the OP of the challenge thread has a link to the "open letter to jref" Where they beg JREF to open an account to both Craig and Aldo. My post above shows that on other boards Aldo is not trustworthy. Perhaps the above post belongs in the Challenge thread.

tsk, tsk AWS, conflating threads.........

I'll have to check out the other thread and comment there lest I hypocritically(sp?) do so here;)
 
Do you realize that Alex Jones (amongst others) is still peddling videos with INCORRECT information contained in it? Information that spawns more misinformation and makes new "truthers" look like idiots because they repeat it. It's bull****.
(emphasis added)
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=57062&t=178711

ohhhhh the irony. PFT and CIT would never release information to the new 'truthers' without making sure it was watertight and unassailable first.
Yet again 'truthers' show an astounding lack of self awareness.
 
Only CIT kooks would think that the Howard Stern show is the height of journalistic excellence.
Isn't it funny how Craig likes to say that he has taken his evidence to all kinds of media outlets and authorities yet when asked he refuses to answer who he has taken it to BUT has no problem bragging about being on Howard Stern.
You would think a true researcher, one who is after the truth would do it the other way around and would be bragging about what authorities and major news outlets he has approached.
I mean after all when you can prove mass murder and your evidence is SOLID enough to take to the courts THE FIRST PLACE you should go is Howard Stern, what a joke.
 
Addressed to TC329:

Morons. We're arguing with morons.

If indeed "Boger watched the plane come in from the bank over the Navy Annex", there is NO WAY he would have seen it north of the Citgo. No way possible, geographically or in any other way, from a vantage point of the helo tower. The Annex and the Citgo are in two distinct locations, mutually exclusive of each other. if the aircraft came from one, there is no way possible it could also come from the other without a huge hyper-G turn (impossible for the aircraft to make) to go from the Annex to north of the Citgo to hitting the building, which the witness says happened but you call him a liar on.

Selective witnesses. That is the raison d'etre of these fools.

You dudes need to make up your mind where the damn plane came from.
 
Welcome Pinch!

I see you have caused quite a stir over at LC.

Now this Welch loon is going at it with the CIT losers.

JFK is threatening to expose your IP: "Judging from his IP's there is a very high probability he has." Signed, JFK over at Zetaboards.

And someone just pointed out that just about every one of the CIT's posts violates the ZetaBoards TOS.

Raise your hands if you knew that LC's bizarre new infatuation with the CIT toolbags was going to get them in trouble.

AND THEY STILL CAN'T EXPLAIN WHY ALL THEIR WITNESSES SAY THE PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON!

/kinda funny that they ignore the bold all caps part of my message.
 
Last edited:
And now Waldo is claiming that HIS witnesses are lying about the plane hitting the Pentagon. They were government patsies, but they were not coached well enough to know to lie about the NOC. So says Waldo.

JFK, you following this? Now you see why CIT is a joke?

And that, folks is all she wrote:

"Fare well and adieu, to you fair Spanish ladies..."
 
IP and Sundries

JFK is threatening to expose your IP: "Judging from his IP's there is a very high probability he has." Signed, JFK over at Zetaboards.

16.5,

I have every belief JFK (over on the "other" board) will treat my IP with the confidence it should be treated with. He PM'ed me, with a concern about two disparate IP address associated with my login, wondering if I was two different people with the same user name. I told him of the difference between my work and home ISPs, and that took care of that. I understand completely the need to check IPs - I do it occasionally on my own blog whenever I suspect some strange goings on.

No need for any concern along those lines

Pinch
 
I would suggesting debating the issue at the pilots forum as they have a thread specifically for debates.

Will you begin the debate over there?

Given Aldo's recent acknowledgment that he never bothered to interview hundreds of key witnesses, Balsamo doesn't have anything to debate.
 
Sorry Pinch, just seemed odd that an admin was talking about your IP in a thread.

Anyhow, and here we see WALDO throwing his witnesses under the bus!

"Haven't you been paying attention?

They said the plane hit the pentagon, because they were on camera to tell us about being there when the plane allegedly hit the pentagon.

They just didn't realize they weren't supposed to tell us about the north side approach.

In other words, they wouldn't have gone on camera if they saw it fly over, didn't think it hit, or realized what the north side path meant. They went on camera, because at the time, they believed the plane hit the building.

Why don't you ask them what they think now."

So: they lied to you on camera, huh? You are saying your witnesses are liars? Wow Waldo, wait til Lyte gets back to the Tree Fort, you gonna have some 'splainin to do!

And I will ask them now. Say Waldo, can you post that email you said that Lagasse sent to you?

You know the one, the one where he emphatically said that the Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Thanks.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom