CIT/Air America Debate Challenge

[The Big Dog]

Lmmfao!!!!!!!!

That Big Pussy[cat] Roberts Won't Debate Cit But He'll Send An Email Pleading Richard Greene Not To Have Cit & Pft On.

Jref = Cowards

Welcome back from your little time out! Say, rather than committing suicide by mod, why don't you address the numerous questions in this very thread.

Anyway, I sure as hell am not going to waste my time with a bunch of boot lickers! Hey, Dom, you know what I'm talking about Dom? lol

 

[Bobert]

Didnt CIT kick Dom out of the treefort?

 

[The Big Dog]

Didnt CIT kick Dom out of the treefort?

Nah, he had to do a little boot licking, and they let him back in.

 

[A W Smith]

Didnt CIT kick Dom out of the treefort?

Guess Dom couldn't score that weed

 

[Bobert]

Poor guy he dropped CIT from his name.
What a shame.
The trio is now a duo.
I guess that weed was just not good enough.

 

[A W Smith]

Nah, he had to do a little boot licking, and they let him back in.

Yeah he licked that text right off that last post he had over there real quick, Too bad Bobert caught it. Hows it feel to be the errand boy Dom? Do they laugh at you behind your back when they send you out to go through the drive through?

 

[Bobert]

Ya Dom you might want to think before you post!

yeah Craig its not like Aldo called him disinfo or anything.........

sorry i'll quit defending CIT.

go kiss some gatekeeping ass.

Dom were you telling Craig to go kiss some gatekeeper "ass"?

 

[Caustic Logic]

The best people for this show are John Farmer and Adam Larson (Caustic Logic).

Darn tootin'. I'm not as good in person/real-time as in type however

I'm actually not kidding about the proposal. Why would Air America need "official story" supporters as counteracts, when their CT friends can debunk them almost just as clearly.

I'd be down w/a collaborative effort, but just don't want to see it as "9/11 Truth" vs. "debunkers" where we all know who really wins. They're mis-representin.

Calling in probably won't work for me, but I did try to drop a line with some tips to Green. I want them on-air. But I checked the orignal link by Pomeroo and that show desc. is not on that page now. Has it been cancelled? I haven't checked CIT's forum to-day and I still won't register for PFFFT's.

 

[jaydeehess]

Originally Posted by Rob
Hi Richard,

As you know by now, we are unable to find much opposition in terms of professional, civil discussion. We have tried Popular Mechanics and the NTSB. So we have decided to scrape the bottom of the barrel and invite internet "debunkers" who spend their days and nights obsessed with our work(although now they are using the excuse they dont want to give us any "attention" when a debate challenge arises). I phoned "pomoroo" on the linked thread below and he started a thread looking for "opposition", but as you can see, not many are stepping up to the plate and after reading through the thread, you can see why it is "scraping the bottom of the barrel" as its mostly ad homs and personal attacks.

If no one does step up to the plate, we can read through the thread on air to show the world how our "opposition" behaves, and we can address the few arguments that are pointed out in the thread. You can find it here...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=113627

Regards,
Rob

Over a year ago, before Robby banned me for daring to do so, I suggested that he create an unemotional, technical paper outlining all the problems with the DFDR data as opposed to the accepted flightpath of Flight 77 and submit it for publication ina mainstream aviation or science magazine such as Aviation and Space Technology or Scientific American.

I suggest that the CIT do the same.

Banter and blather on the internet and radio is simply not going to get the word out for them. Neither is a talk show the place to debate technical issuses. How does one argue the math and physics ignorance they display in a talk format? Does the guest get a chalkboard to use?

To my mind, that is why no one wants to do this with him. All he wants is an arguement not a serious, technical debate.

 

[realitybites]

Well if Rob is forced to read through this thread during the show, I'd like to make a couple of shout outs.

1. To Mom: Hi!

2. To all the authorities and major media outlets that CIT has presented its evidence to: Thanks for your continued suppression of the irrefutable evidence of this world-altering crime. Your monies should be directly deposited shortly after you receive your "economic stimulus check".

And last but not least, to the very members of CIT and PFT: We all look forward to the day in the very near future when the countless hours you've spent over the past 5+ years "researching", "interviewing", and "compiling" the evidence for this monumental cover-up is actually noticed and taken seriously by, well... anyone.

::: crosses fingers :::

.... Any day now.

 

[Caustic Logic]

Good questions! Corrections tho: the witness pictured was on 18th street, has not been ID'd and will supp. be in the Researcher's Edition. His path is said to confirm Jamal's. Both were south of the plane they saw 'over some trees.' Niether one clarifies tey mean directly over the trees rather than across FoV above the trees. There are no supporting witnesses who saw this path to their south 'over some trees.' The official path is also north, but 1600 feet. Craig says neither could see the plane that far away. 1600 feet. Or so, given the ambiguities of FDR INS and such...

sry, was meant to respond to A Smith on prev page

 

[Drudgewire]

But I checked the orignal link by Pomeroo and that show desc. is not on that page now. Has it been cancelled?

There's no mention of a Thursday show at all. That's right, the NWO works fast suckaz!!

 

[pomeroo]

That's not all you forgot. What about a professional wiseass? Shows like that always need one, and I am the undisputed champeen professionaliest wiseass on JREForum. I offer my services.

I think you would add a great deal to the show. I prefer your wiseassery to their idiocy any day.

Wait. Thursday the 15th? I'll be schmoozing with Hillary out here in Los Angeles at that time. Next time though.

Keep your hand on your wallet.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Ron? Will there be a podcast or other sort of recording available for later listening? I'm not going to be around either a computer or a radio that night at that time, not unless the movie theater will let me bring one in.

 

[1337m4n]

Yeah he licked that text right off that last post he had over there real quick, Too bad Bobert caught it. Hows it feel to be the errand boy Dom? Do they laugh at you behind your back when they send you out to go through the drive through?

Join us Dominick.

Craig and Aldo, they just don't understand. They don't see things the way you do. They don't understand your true inner genius.

Join us.

 

[pomeroo]

Hey! Speaking as a far left loon, I resent that remark. Nobody needs to invent crap to discredit Bush, that's why the Truthers annoy me so much.

I would never want to offend you, Brainache. My talent for giving offense is so great, however, that I don't even have to make an effort.

Seriously, that's one of the problems with Bush Derangement Syndrome. People afflicted with it slander him reflexively without stopping to consider if they're making themselves look ridiculous. If Bush speaks out against cancer, it really isn't necessary to put in a few good words for the disease.

 

[pomeroo]

Lmmfao!!!!!!!!

That Big Pussy[cat] Roberts Won't Debate Cit But He'll Send An Email Pleading Richard Greene Not To Have Cit & Pft On.

Jref = Cowards

The cowards are the bogus pilots who have refused all debate offers. We learned from recent threads on this forum the reason why they are reluctant to submit their mad fantasies to critical scrutiny. 'Hardfire' offers the opportunity to present videos, to show plausible flight paths--oops! I forgot: you can't produce a flight path.

 

[pomeroo]

Ron? Will there be a podcast or other sort of recording available for later listening? I'm not going to be around either a computer or a radio that night at that time, not unless the movie theater will let me bring one in.

I don't know. Nobody connected with the show has contacted me.

 

[A W Smith]

I don't know. Nobody connected with the show has contacted me.

I dont even see a schedule for upcoming shows!

 

[ElMondoHummus]

I don't know. Nobody connected with the show has contacted me.

Oh, crap... Ron! Did that Mexican wrestler intercept that call? Because dammit, Ron, I swear, if it turns out that some guy in a Luche Libre mask appears as "Ron Wick" (sic) representing the rationalists on the show tomorrow, I'm gonna hold you responsible!! Imagine! Clowns vs. clowns! We'd never live it down!

Christ!... all you had to do was run the guy one damn block, and the fat woulda dropped from a heart attack, but nooooooooo! It's too fashionable to have operatives stalking you, stealing your checks and ruining your life, 'cept in your case, it wasn't a bunch of trenchcoated men, but some huge weirdo wearing a Luchador mask with chalupa stains around the mouth, but hey! Pomeroo's got to have his own damn "secret agent" stalker and to hell with everyone else...



(For those of you who don't know where this diversion came from: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3610887#post3610887. Just 'cause I felt like it. So there! )