• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

What to do about the truth movement?

What to do about the truth movement?

  • The truth movement should be confronted to prevent the spread of misinformation

    Votes: 50 58.1%
  • The truth movement should be confronted for the sake of its adherents

    Votes: 2 2.3%
  • It really doesn't matter either way

    Votes: 11 12.8%
  • The truth movement can be ignored, arguing is a waste of time

    Votes: 8 9.3%
  • The truth movement ought to be ignored, arguing perpetuates it

    Votes: 11 12.8%
  • (Some faction of) the truth movement is correct

    Votes: 4 4.7%

  • Total voters
    86

Confuseling

Irreligious fanatic
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
1,243
Just curious as to the general spread of opinion about this. I'll let you be the judge of which is the planet x option. ;)
 
Let it be a celebrity deathmatch of no planers vs. planers vs. "teh joos did it" camp...

ETA: I didn't see the poll before, but my comment still stands!
 
Last edited:
I voted option 1, even though it's a thankless, mind-numbing, soul-destroying, masochistic option.

You have to turn over the turds to expose the maggots beneath.
 
Doesn't the truth movement want another investigation on 9/11? What's wrong with that?

Because there has already been an investigation?

Because if there was a new investigation the TM would say it was a cover-up unless it agreed with their infantile inside job fantasy?
 
Because there has already been an investigation?

Because if there was a new investigation the TM would say it was a cover-up unless it agreed with their infantile inside job fantasy?

Y'know, I wonder, operating under the premise that it WAS an inside job, if the government admitted it, what would the truth movement do? Hop up and down saying "we told you so;" or would they say "That's what you want us to believe, the Bush administration isn't collectively smart enough to tie a shoe, let alone pull this off."
 
Doesn't the truth movement want another investigation on 9/11? What's wrong with that?

It's a massive waste of time and money. I thought you Ronulans were against excessive government spending, at least in principal. If not the government, who would fund it? Would the Truth Movement even be happy with a second government explaination if it came at no taxpayer expense? Who would carry it out?
 
In this part of the world (the middle East), conspiracy theories are taken very seriously. Look at all the hoopla over Princess Diana's death from the Egyptian father of Dodi. Also you've got the Iranian President speculating wildly about how the towers fell and blaming it all on Israel. In Saudi they still believe in the Protocols.

That's when it all stops being a source of humour and the butt of jokes. When people act on their beliefs, it's no longer funny.

So yes, it should be confronted.
 
The bush admin. knew there was talk of an attack. Where was the good, no conspiracy CFR? The bush administration could have stopped it but didn't. That's scary enough! Then you have operation Northwoods. Again These things are scary enough. Just the THOUGHT of them spitballing this is terrible. Killing innocent civilians for corporate/special interests.
 
Put him in the longboat till he’s sober,
Put him in the longboat till he’s sober,
Put him in the longboat till he’s sober,
Earl-y in the morning?
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Earl-y in the morning

Stick him in a bag and beat him senseless,
Stick him in a bag and beat him senseless,
Stick him in a bag and beat him senseless,
Earl-y in the morning

Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Earl-y in the morning

Put him in the brig and make him drink it,
Put him in the brig and make him drink it,
Put him in the brig and make him drink it,
Earl-y in the morning

Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Earl-y in the morning

Put him in bed with the captain's daughter,
Put him in bed with the captain's daughter,
Put him in bed with the captain's daughter,
Earl-y in the morning

Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Heave-ho and up she rises,
Earl-y in the morning

Keelhaul the man until he's sober,
Keelhaul the man until he's sober,
Keelhaul the man until he's sober,
Earl-y in the morning

That's all I can be bothered with.

ETA: I put Ignore, as arguing is useless.
 
Last edited:
Just curious as to the general spread of opinion about this. I'll let you be the judge of which is the planet x option. ;)


You've been a member here for a while, and you were "just curious" as to the general opinion about this? Do you actually read the messages in this sub-forum?

Or is this just another one of those "let's justify what we do" messages?
 
You've been a member here for a while, and you were "just curious" as to the general opinion about this? Do you actually read the messages in this sub-forum?

Or is this just another one of those "let's justify what we do" messages?
Opinions change over time. A year ago I would have picked option one (The truth movement should be confronted to prevent the spread of misinformation) now I think option 5 (The truth movement ought to be ignored, arguing perpetuates it ) is more appropriate. The "truth" movement now is just seeking any recognition because it's being ignored and mocked by the general population.
 
Last edited:
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -
Mahatma Gandhi
 
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. But you actually have to get off you ass and do something for that to work." -
What Mahatma Gandhi would have said if he'd ever met the Twoofers.
 
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. But you actually have to get off you ass and do something for that to work." -
What Mahatma Gandhi would have said if he'd ever met the Twoofers.
The issue here is the "truthers" were fought first then ridiculed and ignored. The only outcome from that is they lose!
 
Last edited:
The issue here is the "truthers" were fought first then ridiculed and ignored. The only outcome from that is they lose!



I thought about going that way, but then I thought, "Yeah, but, Gandhi actually had millions of followers who were willing to actually put themselves at risk to accomplish their goals. What have these guys got, the "Don't taze me bro!" guy?


Hmph.
 

Back
Top Bottom