• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

read the question and read the posts from me you quoted :)
 
And you have consistently failed to answer the OP in all of those quotes.
Nobody does "tedious" quite as well as you do though.
Its something you must really work at.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
read the question and read the posts from me you quoted :)
Click to expand...

OK,I read the OP and I read your lame excuses for not answering, so where exactly did you present your evidence to substantiate your claim?

Maybe I missed your overwhelming evidence that backs up your claim, could you sum it up for me?
 
DC, what would it take to convince you that WTC7 collapsed due to fires and damage it sustained?
 
Miragememories said:
The only plausible explanation for this is a controlled demolition.
Click to expand...
Except for the fact that:

A) The explosives produced no blast wave which blew out the windows in the building and hurled shrapnel out of the building (there's a reason why buildings to be demolished by controlled demolition are gutted first);

B) Produced no characteristic flashes of light;

C) Produced no loud, distinctive booms recorded on any of the video cameras which recorded the event, nor for that matter heard clearly by anyone within blocks of the building.
 
scissorhands said:
And you have consistently failed to answer the OP in all of those quotes.
Nobody does "tedious" quite as well as you do though.
Its something you must really work at.
Click to expand...

and why was this diffrence in that test? why dont you answer that question?
 
Last edited:
Corsair 115 said:
C) Produced no loud, distinctive booms recorded on any of the video cameras which recorded the event, nor for that matter heard clearly by anyone within blocks of the building.
Click to expand...

Why do you continue to claim that?

CRAIG BARTMER NYPD: "I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn't see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though. Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn't hear any... I didn't hear any creaking, or... I didn't hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming 'get away, get away, get away from it!'... It was at that moment... I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself... Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the ****'s hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you're hearing "boom, boom, boom, boom, boom." I think I know an explosion when I hear it... Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they're saying... Nothing to account for what we saw..."
Click to expand...


9/11/2001 radio broadcast: "...I was just standing there, ya know... we were watching the building [WTC 7] actually 'cuz it was on fire... the bottom floors of the building were on fire and... we heard this sound that sounded like a clap of thunder... turned around - we were shocked to see that the building was... well it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building and the windows all busted out... it was horrifying... about a second later the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that... we saw the building crash down all the way to the ground... we were in shock."
Click to expand...

http://wrhstore.com/IMAGES/wtc7_med2.wma
 
why do you think it need 1000's of explosives in a CD of WTC7?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
well they not use laymann terms. and my technical english is even worser than my normal english.

just tell me why, what is your problem? you linked to the tests.
Click to expand...

I have dealt with engineers from many countries, Mexico (where I lived), Germany, Korea, China and Sweden to name a few. You would be the first who's technical English was worse than their normal.
 
Disbelief said:
I have dealt with engineers from many countries, Mexico (where I lived), Germany, Korea, China and Sweden to name a few. You would be the first who's technical English was worse than their normal.
Click to expand...

i always never need english at work, currently we have 1 English talking welder, the rest is all frensh. your clients are mostly German Speaking, in companys i worked earlier , we was involved in English speaking markets. but i did not have to deal with the costumers, and we had specialists for the english handbooks to our machines. the ones that needed good english went to Dallas or the UK offices to get used to it. something i didnt do.
the only Costumer that talks english atm, is from HongKong, and the bussines is done in frensh, becuase its actually a frensh costumer.
english isnt needed much here. and if i need english terms its more things like crankshafts and mostly has not to deal with wood or fires. only metals.

btw: also my normal english was not learned in school, i learned other languages, Dutch for example. Because i partially grew up in Belgium.
 
Last edited:
aggle-rithm said:
Take my advice: Find yourself a nice country and complete the growth process.
Click to expand...

well i really think i will grow the rest of my life, atleast i hope so, sure not my body height, maybe weight. but also in other aspects i keep learning and growing. are you don already with it? nothing left to learn and to grow?
 
Back to topic, please.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
MarkyX said:
Spliced image. This is not valid evidence.
Click to expand...

You can see the complete video here;

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html

“Amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”

CBS News anchor Dan Rather commenting on the collapse of Building 7 - September 11, 2001 at approx 5:30pm EST.​

The screencaps were cropped to show the as many steps in the collapse as possible.

The video shows that the east side was not pulling the west side down as the whole roofline was very level.

For those who obsess over my use of the term "level", you only reveal the pathetic weakness of your debunk.

This is a huge building were talking about. For WTC 7's roofline to remain that level through that range of collapse is absolutely remarkable.
Nit picking over whether it was 100% dead on level adds nothing to your case.

MM
 
Miragememories said:
You can see the complete video here;

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html

“Amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”

CBS News anchor Dan Rather commenting on the collapse of Building 7 - September 11, 2001 at approx 5:30pm EST.​

The screencaps were cropped to show the as many steps in the collapse as possible.

The video shows that the east side was not pulling the west side down as the whole roofline was very level.

For those who obsess over my use of the term "level", you only reveal the pathetic weakness of your debunk.

This is a huge building were talking about. For WTC 7's roofline to remain that level through that range of collapse is absolutely remarkable.
Nit picking over whether it was 100% dead on level adds nothing to your case.

MM
Click to expand...

Reminiscent: awakening memories of something similar; suggestive (usually fol. by of)

Reminiscent of CD =/= is CD.

And just how level should the roof have been in your opinion (please list your credentials that show you are qualified to make this juudgment)? Or is this simply more arguing from incredulity? Don't most buildings that are brought down with CD fall in the middle first? (Hint: that is how you get it to fall in its on footprint)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom