No but it is the threat that matters. If someone told me they were going to hurt me or kill me I would take it seriously especially if they were angry when they said it (as opposed to joking). If someone threatens murder or violence it is a non-sequitor if they have performed these actions in the past or not, a threat is still a threat.
Whoever said that it was a "foundation of the whole Truther thing?" It is just one of hundreds of unanswered questions.
I have to respect these guys for doing what they believe is right just as I have to have repect for all the posters on this forum even if they may be wrong about certain aspects of 9/11. Having said that they are just young men who have come to the same conclusion as millions of other people in the world so saying that they are my heroes would not be accurate. My heroes are the rescue workers and firefighters who risked or lost their lives on 9/11. My hero is also Willie Rodriguez who whether you choose to acknowledge his testimony or not, did in fact save the lives of many people on 9/11. My heroes are also Bob McIlvane and the Jersey Girls for their continued efforts to learn and spread the truth about what happened to their family members. I take what they say very seriously because they are the least likely to have any kind of agenda whether it be profit, fame, or covering up for someone. They are only interested in the truth.
I guess it depends on the context in which a "call for the gallows" is being made. If the Truthers say there should be a real investigation and IF certain members of the government were found to be complicit then they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, then I would have to agree. If Truthers are naming names of people they speculate were complicit and suggesting they should be brought to the gallows without ever being found guilty in a real investigation then I would, of course, disaprove.
Coulter insulted certain specific victims of the 9/11 tragedies. As far as I know Avery, Bermas and Rowe have only expounded their views about the events of 9/11. They may be right or wrong but I know of no occaission that they were specifically disrespectful to family members of the victims or to any other group or specific person. Do you? If they were disrespectful then of course I do not in any way condone it.
Please name just one family member who is not interested in knowing the truth of what really happened on that day. Name one family member who has specifically stated that they would be opposed to a new investigation. We cannot make sweeping generalizations about the ones who have not been publicly vocal about there views. My whole point is that ALL of the family members just want the truth and NONE of the family members have agendas.
Links?!
Would you mind defining "the truth". Your not talking about controlled demolition or MIHOP right? That crap is pure fantasy and no one that was there believes it. (Yes I have fiends that were there)
Again, links. If they did actually say anything remotely like this I would like to see the full context. If they did outright accuse a certain person of deliberately murdering his son then I agree with you completely. This is unfounded, disrespectful, and inexcusable behaviour. When I referred to Coulter and O'Reilly I provided links to sites that confirmed what they had said.
