• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Merged]Me and Mr. Jones

MikeW said:
This will be Richard Bacon's show tonight.
Click to expand...

Oh dear Lord.

I thought that this was going to be a fierce and insightful debate, but it turns out that you're being hosted by the voice of BBC3's classic Annoying Pop Songs We Love To Hate.

UPDATE

A brief check of Mr Bacon's wikipedia page revealed that 'he was in a relationship with fellow Blue Peter presenter Konnie Huq...He does not like pornography movies'. Both you and Alex should be praying that he doesn't side with you.
 
Last edited:
Architect said:
Good luck, mate. Stick with your usual MO and you should come across well. Remember Brits naturally object to loud-mouthed self opinionated erses like AJ.
Click to expand...
Jeremy Clarkson's very existence seems to refute this.
 
Finnegan said:
Jeremy Clarkson's very existence seems to refute this.
Click to expand...


You know, everything in my system says I should hate Clarkston but I do actually find him quite amusing. I'd love to hear his views on Jones, given what he already thinks of most Americans (sorry, lads).
 
Last edited:
TC329 said:
Maybe your buddy will be willing to participate on your show in return and you can schedule me so I can expose how he is complicit in the cover up for the Bush Administration and therefor an accessory to the 3000 murders on 9/11.

Or are you two skeeeeeeeeeered?
Click to expand...


You have been as thoroughly discredited as any tinfoil-hatter can possibly be. Your contention is beyond stupid.

You couldn't expose yourself on a subway, although I'm sure that there are those who would disagree.
 
pomeroo said:
You couldn't expose yourself on a subway, although I'm sure that there are those who would disagree.
Click to expand...

Warning, as you'll be on UK radio. "Subway" is a chain of sandwich stores, not the underground rail network.

;)
 
CurtC said:
Funny that. I can't read the title of this thread without thinking:

Meeeee eeeeee
aaaaaa aaaand

MISTER

Mister Jooonnes...
Click to expand...


I was beginning to think that no one was going to get it.

"Me and Mrs. Jones,
We got a thing going on.
We both know that it's wrong,
But it's much too strong to let it go now..."

The singer was Billy Paul.
 
Incidentally, if you want to localise some of your comments on air do remember that Edinburgh University have published a persuasive paper - IMO - that argues that collapse could have occurred in a severe fire without an aircraft impact.

Likewise a lot of very sound fire testing data has been carried out by the University of Sheffield (oh, these NWO shills, eh) which supports the NIST findings and that UK building regulations recognise that unprotected steelwork only has a structural integrity of abouy 30 minutes in a fire, hence the requirement to provide significant extra protection.

It might be worth quickly asking the Daves and others for any big English fires that took out steel framed buildings recently, too. I seem to recall there was one which took out some firemen.

Oh...and progressive collapse. Ronan Point. And not even steel.
 
And remember, you're on a BRITISH radio show, not an ENGLISH one.

[/nervous tick]
 
Alex apparently referred to Screw Loose Change today on his show as a "Pentagon operation", and is offering to donate $10,000 to Luke and the Changers for their lawsuits against the Post and the Lovetros. Downloading the show now, I will fill in some details. Might be a good thing to hit him with if he moans about freedom of speech.
 
You know, leading UK engineering journal New Civil Engineer (aka NCE) had no problem with the NIST report findings. Ditto the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Journal.
 
TC329 said:
Maybe your buddy will be willing to participate on your show in return and you can schedule me so I can expose how he is complicit in the cover up for the Bush Administration and therefor an accessory to the 3000 murders on 9/11.

Or are you two skeeeeeeeeeered?
Click to expand...

Oh CIT, always good for a laugh!
 
TC, I'm sure that Ron will have you on his show, just as soon as you figure out how a plane could have flown at high speed over the Navy Annex then turned north of Citgo and flown over the Pentagon without a) banking so greatly everyone would have mentioned it, and b) the wings coming off as the plane disintergrates under the g forces.

Good luck on the BBC Ron, I would say make Jones look like a fool, but he really has no need of help to do that.
 
Last edited:
Anyone else having trouble listening to the show? I keep getting a recording that the show is unavailable for streaming. This is the link MikeW linked to. Is there another that was posted in the thread that I'm missing?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom