• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Merged]Peer-reviewed technical paper to appear in mainstream journal

ElMondoHummus said:
Not to nitpick or move the goalposts, but even if he finds phases consistent with a thermite reaction, how does he separate naturally occuring reactions arising just from the presence of rust, aluminum, etc. from deliberately planted thermite? Seems to me that even if Jones found any such phases he would still be quite a long way from establishing thermite demolitions.
Click to expand...

when his newest claims of red/grey chips that according to him seems to be a sort of thermite, are true and provable in other samples, i think we dont need to look for natural sources. If
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Not to nitpick or move the goalposts, but even if he finds phases consistent with a thermite reaction, how does he separate naturally occuring reactions arising just from the presence of rust, aluminum, etc. from deliberately planted thermite? Seems to me that even if Jones found any such phases he would still be quite a long way from establishing thermite demolitions.
Click to expand...

Yup you're right, slightly poor phrasing on my part.

Finding thermite consistent residues would be the first step toward determining whether thermite was present. It certainly wouldn't be proof. However, so far Jones hasn't even done this.
 
First Jones published his research in a Marxist economics journal.

Then he published it multiple times in his own journal.

Now he appears ready to publish what appears to be a comedic piece in a "maintrsteam" journal.

For someone trying to expose a conspiracy and prevent a fascist NWO police state, Jones sure is taking his sweet time. In fact it's almost as if he isn't serious about it at all.
 
Last edited:
CHF said:
First Jones published his research in a Marxist economics journal.

Then he published it multiple times in his own journal.

Now he appears ready to publish what appears to be a comedic piece in a "maintrsteam" journal.

For someone trying to expose a conspiracy and prevent a fascist NWO police state, Jones sure is taking his sweet time. In fact it's almost as if he isn't serious about it at all.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm...now where else in Trutherville have I seen that particular fire in the belly...?

Ah, that's it, fighting against the murderous government by arguing against a tiny population of skeptics on the internet.
 
CHF said:
First Jones published his research in a Marxist economics journal.

Then he published it multiple times in his own journal.

Now he appears ready to publish what appears to be a comedic piece in a "maintrsteam" journal.

For someone trying to expose a conspiracy and prevent a fascist NWO police state, Jones sure is taking his sweet time. In fact it's almost as if he isn't serious about it at all.
Click to expand...

And ironically when I submitted my Legge paper to him he rejected it on the basis that it had already been published in a journal, our semi-parody Journal of Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.
 
JamesB said:
And ironically when I submitted my Legge paper to him he rejected it on the basis that it had already been published in a journal, our semi-parody Journal of Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.
Click to expand...

Submit a PDF or Microsoft Word Document to the Journals E-mail address. Check manuscript length limitations listed below. Papers under review, accepted for publication, or published elsewhere are not accepted. E-mail the Journals Department for JD911 for complete instructions for manuscript preparation. Submit your documents for review at submissions@jod911.com
 
Dictator Cheney said:
Submit a PDF or Microsoft Word Document to the Journals E-mail address. Check manuscript length limitations listed below. Papers under review, accepted for publication, or published elsewhere are not accepted. E-mail the Journals Department for JD911 for complete instructions for manuscript preparation. Submit your documents for review at submissions@jod911.com
Click to expand...

88.


:rolleyes:
 
deep44 said:
Just noticed this over on 911blogger.com - it's from Steven Jones:

1. Recently had a technical paper accepted for publication following peer-review (three reviewers!), in a mainstream journal. Hopefully it will be out soon. Please read the entire paper when it comes out -- not just the title! You will see a little humor coming through (I hope you'll see it), but the overall thrust is very serious: countering popular myths about the destruction of WTC 7 and the Towers -- and pointing out areas where we the authors find agreement with NIST (and FEMA). Yes, we agree with NIST that the Towers fell at nearly free-fall speed, for example -- and that the WTC fires were NOT hot enough to melt structural steel. Don't you? The paper should come out about the same time as Truth Week, and hopefully add to the momentum of that week (beginning April 16th).
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


God... Don't tell me he's going with "the towers fell too fast" and "the fires weren't hot enough to melt steel, therefore the collapses were anomalous" crap...
 
Last edited:
Bumped:

I just got my latest Edition of High times, and Mad Magazine: no peer reviewed article in sight.

Anybody seen this alleged article?
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
I just got my latest Edition of High times, and Mad Magazine: no peer reviewed article in sight.
Click to expand...

What's #1 on the Hemp 100 this month? I'll just die if it isn't Metalocalypse.
sweatdrop.gif
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
God... Don't tell me he's going with "the towers fell too fast" and "the fires weren't hot enough to melt steel, therefore the collapses were anomalous" crap...
Click to expand...

He is but not how you think. He is referring to the microspheres and the Lee report that states the fires caused iron contents to melt and form microspheres.

This isn't in reference to fire melting the steel structures.
 
As you well recall, we've been over the Lee Report, and the microspheres therein -- by virtue of being found after cleanup was nearly completed -- have everything to do with cutting of the material post-collapse, and little to nothing to do with the fires.

Surely you haven't forgotten.
 
deep44 said:
So what will the new "standard" be? Multiple peer-reviewed publications in mainstream journals?
Click to expand...

When or "when" an article casting doubt on the collapse is published in a reputable peer-reviewed journal, then the debate can actually begin. Up till then, any attention given to these absurd theories is probably pointless. There's certainly no scientific controversy.



Don't worry, you guys have a couple weeks to think about it.
Click to expand...

At least.
 
Sooooo, where's that article? Did I miss it? Or is today still September 12, 2001?
 
It's not a problem if you re-boot your system often - I find two or three times a day and older versions of Windows work just fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom